Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

6chars

(3,967 posts)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:25 PM Sep 2015

Iran Deal Within One Vote Of Being Veto-Proof

Source: Huffington Post

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) came out in favor of the Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday, calling his decision a "very hard choice" and putting the administration within one vote of a victory.

Coons is the 33rd Senate Democrat to come out in favor of the deal, which curbs Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for some sanctions relief provided by President Barack Obama. The president only needs one more Senate Democrat to reach 34, the number needed to sustain his veto.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/iran-deal-within-one-vote-of-being-veto-proof_55e5e3d0e4b0c818f61948c5

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran Deal Within One Vote Of Being Veto-Proof (Original Post) 6chars Sep 2015 OP
Excellent. eom Purveyor Sep 2015 #1
From the article: PearliePoo2 Sep 2015 #2
Cardin, Heitkamp, Booker, Wyden, Blumenthal, Manchin, Bennet, Peters, Warner geek tragedy Sep 2015 #3
Cantwell??? Time to call my Senator! PearliePoo2 Sep 2015 #4
Maybe Booker or Blumenthal - the rest are probably hopeless. Elmer S. E. Dump Sep 2015 #8
Mikulski, Cantwell, Cardin, Manchin (yes Joe Manchin) are all geek tragedy Sep 2015 #9
You're right, but I would be surprised about Manchin. Elmer S. E. Dump Sep 2015 #11
typo 6chars Sep 2015 #5
typo...THERE you "fixed" it. lol PearliePoo2 Sep 2015 #6
partly 6chars Sep 2015 #7
the two Democrats voting the wrong way on this come from deep blue states. geek tragedy Sep 2015 #10
This is an enormous crock! mpcamb Sep 2015 #12

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
2. From the article:
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:51 PM
Sep 2015

"Eleven Senate Democrats have yet to announce their position on the deal. Those who remain undecided have pointed to Israel's security as a reason for hesitancy. "

Ok...WHO are these eleven, anyone know?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Mikulski, Cantwell, Cardin, Manchin (yes Joe Manchin) are all
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:34 PM
Sep 2015

more likely to support it than Corey "Stop Attacking Private Equity" Booker.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
5. typo
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:04 PM
Sep 2015

"Those who remain undecided have pointed to their seats' security as a reason for hesitancy."

Once the required number declare, I fully expect some of those 11 will get a green light from the party to oppose the deal in order to protect their seats. That's a standard tactic, since from the party's perspective, it isn't material how much the deal passes by as long as it passes, but it is material if they lose any seats.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
6. typo...THERE you "fixed" it. lol
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:09 PM
Sep 2015

I believe you are exactly right....good thinking!
So, can we surmise that any of the eleven who are NOT running for re-election would be the prime candidate for the remaining "yes" vote?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. the two Democrats voting the wrong way on this come from deep blue states.
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:39 PM
Sep 2015

The third likely wrong vote--Ron "Don't Call me Rand" Wyden--is also from a deep blue state.

No red state Democrats have even indicated that they're even leaning towards voting for it.

Donnelly has committed to voting for it.

Manchin has broadly suggested he would vote for it.

McCaskill has committed to voting for it.

As has Jon Tester.

All of the purple state Senators who have announced--Bill Nelson, Tim Kaine, Jean Shaheen, Angus King--have announced in favor of the deal.

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
12. This is an enormous crock!
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:45 PM
Sep 2015

Is there any way in hell removing 98% of potential nuclear material make the wordless safe?
Pandering for money is the only reason to be on the other side of this.

Grow a spine, Senators, and do what's right for the US, the Middle East, the world, but maybe not for Biibi and the $3, 000,000,000 a year fear-mongers. No fear, then maybe less money in play...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran Deal Within One Vote...