Doctor: Man accused of killing wife was delirious from pot
Source: Associated Press
Doctor: Man accused of killing wife was delirious from pot
Sadie Gurman, Associated Press
Updated 4:00 pm, Monday, September 21, 2015
DENVER (AP) A Colorado man accused of killing his wife after eating marijuana-infused candy he bought at a legal pot shop was experiencing psychotic-like symptoms due to the drug, a doctor wrote in recently filed court documents.
Richard Kirk, 49, faces first-degree murder charges in the April 2014 shooting death of his wife, Kristine, who died while describing his erratic behavior on a 911 call. His attorneys have suggested that Kirk was so impaired by the candy that he may not have intended to kill her.
He changed his plea Friday to not guilty by reason of insanity, and the court documents give new details about his defense.
Kirk was intoxicated with THC, marijuana's psychoactive ingredient, which led to delirium, Dr. Andrew Monte, a defense witness, wrote in his report that was submitted to the court in August.
. . .
Just before she was shot, Kristine Kirk told dispatchers that her husband was acting more drunk than violent, crawling through a bedroom window and cutting his legs on broken glass. But prosecutors argue he had the wherewithal to remember the code to a gun safe and press the weapon to his wife's head. They have said the couple had been fighting over marital and financial problems.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Doctor-Man-accused-of-killing-wife-was-delirious-6519560.php
ut oh
(905 posts)Not the fact that the dude may have been off his rocker already...
...and the marital problems....
Lychee2
(405 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)They_Live
(3,246 posts)Doesn't sound very believable to me. Blame it on the candy...
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Recent studies suggest that even one or two drinks significantly increases the amount of THC absorbed into the system. So yeah, I'd put good money on the guess that nine to fourteen beers were involved, too. But sure, blame the weed! It's got to be the weed!
ion_theory
(235 posts)Time for Christie and the other hardcore anti-marijuana repugs to jump on this as endemic of what weed does to society. Just like they did with that poor girl who was murdered by the illegal immigrant as proof we have a illegal migrant problem.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)died in Germany from smoking. The autopsies said their tickers couldn't take it.
ion_theory
(235 posts)Not trying to challenge what you said, but curious about it. I've never heard of cardiac issues arising from marijuana, unless they had a bad trip and couldn't handle the mental stress. Or bad fertilizer or pesticides were used to grow.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)ion_theory
(235 posts)Lychee2
(405 posts)From the article:
The researchers believe that this change in heart rhythm called arrhythmia - was caused by cannabis.
The reason they came to this conclusion was that both had smoked the drug within a few hours of their death and neither had any history of heart problems....
While the German researchers now believe they have proved that cannabis can kill, it remains unclear how it can trigger heart problems.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2568326/Smoking-cannabis-CAN-kill-German-researchers-identify-two-men-died-purely-result-using-drug.html#ixzz3mQERtZLs
ion_theory
(235 posts)bluedigger
(17,090 posts)There was no reason to to do so. If you have a bad heart, you have a bad heart. Or maybe it was just those two times in Germany, and never anywhere else over all these decades now.
ion_theory
(235 posts)if I can say with certainty that marijuana cannot cause this...than no I cannot. Honestly, I believe the doctor that THC can cause a negative psychoactive response of this degree, but that isn't my point. My point is that ppl will take this a proof marijuana is to dangerous to be freely consumed by the public. Just like they used a horrible incident in San Fran that we have a national illegal immigrant problem. Weed isn't a drug for everyone, but that doesn't mean no one should be able to enjoy it. Just like not all illegal immigrants are rapist and murderers.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)there will be some people who have an adverse sideffect to it, in this case if he wants to plead temporary insanity because of the drug then he should agree to be committed to a facility for 6 to 12 weeks during which time they may or may not slip some of drug at the same dosage to see if he actually does have a bad reaction.
840high
(17,196 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)millions upon millions of death over the centuries from people ingesting cannabis, that, although not impossible, is highly improbable.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)claims would probably alot harder to document especially if its something that only rarely occurs.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)argue an insanity plea for something you intentionally ingested? It's not like someone laced his cigarettes with PCP and he bit a cop. Even if we take his claims at face value, he took a psychoactive substance for the purpose of getting high, got higher than he bargained for, and killed someone.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)How about you provide some proof that pot causes psychotic, murderous episodes.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Do you agree?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Sorry dude. You can't blame the weed.
ion_theory
(235 posts)main funders of the anti-marijuana lobbyists. To them there is more money to be made with weed being illegal than legal. Also Bill hicks is my other alias online...weird.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)yardwork
(61,753 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
callous taoboy
(4,593 posts)Fucking hell.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...Oreo's and corn chips which proves,,,..nah... bad example...
IronLionZion
(45,621 posts)it's dishonest to blame it on the weed
Warpy
(111,429 posts)knows this is bullshit only a DEA agent could possibly believe.
Now the booze he drank is a completely different matter.
former9thward
(32,128 posts)Alcohol is consumed by scores of millions of people in this country everyday. There should be millions of killings everyday. Right? Funny how the pot defenders are always putting out silly prohibitionist talking points but they are horrified that mj is illegal in most places.
Warpy
(111,429 posts)and there's a reason a lot of people call alcohol "asshole in a bottle," it disinhibits people and makes quite a few of them belligerent.
The only danger most stoners who aren't drunk pose is to a bag of chips.
The pharmacodynamics of both are well known and are not "silly prohibitionist talking points."
Hate to bust ya bubble, but there it is. Prohibition of either substance is stupid, wasteful of lives and resources, and ultimately futile. However, of the two, pot is much more benign overall in intoxication and upon body systems.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)Richard D
(8,813 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Richard D
(8,813 posts)On the tardis.
rurallib
(62,477 posts)who will testify to damn near anything.
Iggo
(47,587 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Especially consumables that pack s ton of thc.
However if I chug a bottle of gin and kill someone that does not mean booze should be illegal. Just like pot.
bluedigger
(17,090 posts)They can jazz it up into delirium all they want but I don't see a Colorado jury buying it. In fact, I'd guess it was premeditated from the get-go.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)'Reefer madness' as a defense? Bullshit.
snort
(2,334 posts)Lets see want to kill wife? check. What to use for a defense (cuz im smart)? I know buy some cannabis and then claim crazy. Right.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)They_Live
(3,246 posts)Especially psychotics. Also...some of these highly cultivated strains are much stronger than the regular brand.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)I used to deal with the tobacco industry and with anti-smoking groups. You have no idea how many "researchers" are for sale -- and the tobacco industry and liquor industry have the deep pockets to buy them.
The problem is bad in the US and it's even worse in Europe, where "publish or perish" is particularly brutal.
Beware of any research that shows the tobacco industry and the liquor industry in a good light and their competition in a bad light.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)People have bad trips. It happens. Some people react poorly to it. Others ingest too much and the psychoactive elements can cause hallucinations. It's entirely possible for someone to get wasted and kill someone. I once got punched in the face by a stoned roommate who thought I'd look funny with a flatter nose. The notion that pot is peaceful and all potheads are nonviolent is silly and has no basis in reality. Assholes are going to do asshole things, whether they're drunk, stoned or sober.
Pot isn't a defense against criminal acts. Some people get drunk and react poorly. It happens. Some people drink too much and the effects of alcohol can cause the persons perceptions of reality to change. Others drink too much and get behind the wheel of a car. Others drink too much and rape, rob, or assault people.
Our justice system doesn't allow those people to use alcohol as an excuse, and it shouldn't allow people to use pot as an excuse. YOU are responsible for your behavior when you're drunk or stoned. If you do something stupid or illegal, YOU must face the consequences for doing so. Eating pot brownies is no different than drinking vodka or beer. You need to know your limits, you need to plan ahead and make sure you'll be taken care of while you're stoned or drunk, and you need to be responsible for yourself. If you fail to do that and commit a crime, you need to be punished for it.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)in a person that is not there already. I think this guy already had intent to shoot his wife before this. The pot just lowered his inhibitions. He also had easy access to a weapon, and that's a bad thing even for non-intoxicated people.
Also, the number of occasions where we hear about people doing this while using cannabis is still pretty rare. People still have been using it, even being illegal. It's not like suddenly those numbers are going to change.
They_Live
(3,246 posts)And what else was in his system?
valerief
(53,235 posts)underpants
(183,002 posts)You know the rest
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
olddots This message was self-deleted by its author.
rug
(82,333 posts)But I would check the candy first. I bet it was this.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)looking at gun violence in the same way...(no - I do not believe it was the pot) - take away the guns..from the already insane...
KT2000
(20,602 posts)BS
greenman3610
(3,947 posts)"But prosecutors argue he had the wherewithal to remember the code to a gun safe and press the weapon to his wife's head"
that sounds like a fairly functional dude.
Nobody that has had experience with marijuana would find this credible. this is designed to play to
a tea party jury.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)or maybe not. Hard to say, but it's doubtful that pot caused a net new issue for this man.
cstanleytech
(26,347 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)But I don't know anything about the matter, or pot candy, or anything else. The inner Joe Kenda in me says it doesn't really add up.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)jmowreader
(50,585 posts)Maureen Dowd bought a marijuana-infused candy bar, ate the whole thing in one sitting, and wound up seeing snakes.
But let's see...delirious enough you don't know whether you're shooting your wife, but sober enough to get your gun safe open? Sorry Dick, but I'm calling bullshit on this one.
markpkessinger
(8,409 posts)Here is the text of my comment:
Two points:
(1) If you are going to sample an intoxicating substance of any kind, legal or illegal, that you are inexperienced in using or that is in a form with which you do not have experience, do your homework first. Research things like how much to ingest/take, what to expect, etc. And preferrably, if you are going to do it, do it in a safe, familiar place with someone who has experience with it. Doing it alone in a strange hotel room is just . . . need I say it?
(2) To the makers and marketers of these products: you really should have anticipated that if something was suddenly made legal that is illegal in most of the rest of the country, it stands to reason you would have a significant number of inexperienced users interested in 'sampling the goodies.' Therefore, with products such as these, a good rule of thumb is to include usage directions that will account for the stupidest thing a new user could possibly do: like trying it herself, in a strange hotel room, alone.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Before you feel delirious? Never heard of it...
Javaman
(62,534 posts)but to take this a step further.
why not make the same claim about people who are drunk and kill their wife or husbands?
that's more accurate and far more common but alas, the media enjoys selective reporting.
drunks killing people (which happens a hell of a lot more) just don't make the headlines.
reefer madness is to blame, yeah, that's it, reefer madness.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)markpkessinger
(8,409 posts). . . I happened to catch an episode of "Divorce Court," with Judge Lynn Toler. There was a couple before her, each of whom seemed to have an alcohol problem, and whenever the two of them drank, they tended to get into physical altercations with each other. Judge Toler went off on a rant about how alcohol, unlike pot, has an effect on many people that makes them want to "get up in each other's faces," to use the Judge's words. And then, forgetting herself for just a moment, added, "At least with pot, when people smoke a joint, all they want to do is sit down!"