Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:11 AM Sep 2015

6 killed, 7 hurt when SUV rolls during Texas police chase

Source: AP

EDNA, Texas (AP) — Police say six people died and seven were hurt when their SUV rolled during a police chase in South Texas.

City police Chief Clinton Wooldridge says officers tried to stop the SUV for a traffic violation in Edna, 90 miles southwest of Houston, early Thursday, but the vehicle sped away. As police chased the car on Highway 59, it flipped several times.

Wooldridge says four people died at the scene and two more died at hospitals. Seven others are hospitalized. No information has been released on their conditions.

Wooldridge says he believes the victims are citizens of Honduras and Guatemala. He has no information on their legal status in the U.S.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/be9c5c7799214067ba2e8f466b4ca93d/6-killed-7-hurt-when-suv-rolls-during-texas-police-chase

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
6 killed, 7 hurt when SUV rolls during Texas police chase (Original Post) Omaha Steve Sep 2015 OP
Clearly the driver was scared to stop yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #1
Unless they let the car go and the people in the car were in danger? Democat Sep 2015 #3
Plus the people could dump christx30 Sep 2015 #7
There is a better way. Cops love the chase of course, which is Darb Sep 2015 #2
stolen cars, kidnapped kid inside, someone high on meth about to kill another driver snooper2 Sep 2015 #4
So the cop chases them and everyone inside dies? BillZBubb Sep 2015 #9
So the police should never pursue a driver that refuses to stop? Throd Sep 2015 #10
Only rarely should they have a high speed pursuit. BillZBubb Sep 2015 #13
Is there a link to something saying it was 'high speed'? (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #22
+10 840high Sep 2015 #33
Well you have identified the 1,000,000th percentile, thanks. Darb Sep 2015 #49
you should head on over to your local LEA and do your pitch, they might just go for it! snooper2 Sep 2015 #50
Unless the car is stolen, or the plate is stolen Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #5
Exactly, there was no reason to give chase for a simple traffic violation Warpy Sep 2015 #29
The driver ran. His first BIG mistake. TxVietVet Sep 2015 #6
When FASCISM comes to America it will come as blind support for police. BillZBubb Sep 2015 #11
This driver was most likely a coyote. Hangingon Sep 2015 #20
Im sure this is not the reason for this chase... SkyDaddy7 Sep 2015 #23
I see the authoritarians are all over this. blackspade Sep 2015 #8
Exactly. It is pretty pathetic from a supposedly progressive site. BillZBubb Sep 2015 #12
Exactly, the law should learn to follow, not chase. edgineered Sep 2015 #15
It would appear the corollary is also true. LanternWaste Sep 2015 #16
And the backseat second guessers are all over it as well dbackjon Sep 2015 #25
Maybe it's because the police are a gang of criminals. blackspade Sep 2015 #31
Way to broadbrush every officer dbackjon Sep 2015 #32
Then the "95%" better get to work arresting these scum. blackspade Sep 2015 #34
That's what Republicans say about Muslims. n/t cigsandcoffee Sep 2015 #41
Nice try at deflection. blackspade Sep 2015 #42
I haven't deflected anything. You're using the very same argument. n/t cigsandcoffee Sep 2015 #44
Absolutely not, and you know it. blackspade Sep 2015 #45
What I'm saying is simple. cigsandcoffee Sep 2015 #46
The problem is that it is not a 'few' blackspade Sep 2015 #48
Another effing petty violation. And I do not give a rip what jwirr Sep 2015 #14
Wow, some cops must love killing people. I mean, what OTHER reason is there for doing valerief Sep 2015 #17
FFS Action_Patrol Sep 2015 #19
Welcome to my Forever Ignored club. nt valerief Sep 2015 #39
Since you won't see this Action_Patrol Sep 2015 #43
The cops didn't kill anybody Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #30
Damn...How the hell do you fit 15 passengers in a Ford Explorer? Blue_Tires Sep 2015 #18
Dangerously. Most would not have had seats, let alone seat belts muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #21
My Family once packed 12 people in a 1970 Datsun pickup.... happyslug Sep 2015 #35
It was the "GOP Presidential Field" model. Lizzie Poppet Sep 2015 #47
And how many other travelers were placed in danger Ilsa Sep 2015 #24
Shouldn't the primary blame go on the DRIVER? dbackjon Sep 2015 #26
Not around here, apparently. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #27
I'm not saying the driver was blameless. Ilsa Sep 2015 #36
It is fairly oblivious this was a vehicle transporting undocumented people, Edna is in South Texas, Thinkingabout Sep 2015 #28
Those lives could also have been saved . . . markpkessinger Sep 2015 #37
Don't transfer the blame of this wreck except on the driver, the police was not driving the vehicle. Thinkingabout Sep 2015 #38
If it had been a gun instead of an SUV, this would have been a mass shooting. OakCliffDem Sep 2015 #40
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Clearly the driver was scared to stop
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:16 AM
Sep 2015

Of course the cops could easily taken the license plate and deal with it latter. I don't think police chasing the vehicle was the way to deal with this.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
3. Unless they let the car go and the people in the car were in danger?
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:32 AM
Sep 2015

When someone runs from the police, they have no way of knowing why. What if there were hostages inside, or felons that would commit more crimes if not caught?

They probably made the wrong decision in this case, but it's not an easy decision to make.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
2. There is a better way. Cops love the chase of course, which is
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:27 AM
Sep 2015

why they happen. It doesn't have to happen that way. If someone gets away, then mark the license plate and the associated VIN and that vehicle is done the next time it is stopped. It cannot be registered. It cannot be insured. Even put a hold on the VIN when it shows up anywhere to be serviced or sold.

That is a deterrent. That vehicle becomes done until the driver is identified. Or something like it, but car chases are stupid.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
4. stolen cars, kidnapped kid inside, someone high on meth about to kill another driver
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:45 AM
Sep 2015

Yeah, cops just love to put their life at risk because some fucking idiot decided to run


You may be watching too many movies

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
9. So the cop chases them and everyone inside dies?
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:01 AM
Sep 2015

Someone, mostly innocent, is more likely to die in a chase.

Cops lives are rarely at risk in a chase. It is the passengers of the chased vehicle, or other vehicles hit by the chased vehicle who suffer.

You may not be thinking clearly.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
13. Only rarely should they have a high speed pursuit.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:11 AM
Sep 2015

This was a case where one never should have happened.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
49. Well you have identified the 1,000,000th percentile, thanks.
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 11:41 AM
Sep 2015

But mostly, my approach would work. If a car thief gets away, oh the horror. So what. Better than a bunch of people killed for certain.

As for that one in a million situation that you identified, well, we might have to suck that up too.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
5. Unless the car is stolen, or the plate is stolen
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:53 AM
Sep 2015

The police don't know why they are running.

I agree that chases are stupid, so I have little sympathy for the driver of the car.

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
29. Exactly, there was no reason to give chase for a simple traffic violation
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 06:37 PM
Sep 2015

only to call it in, giving description, plate, speed and direction. A roadblock ahead would have been a better way to handle this one.

Human trafficking is a big deal here in border states, people delivering undocumented workers to businesses all over the country that have contracted to hire them.

TxVietVet

(1,905 posts)
6. The driver ran. His first BIG mistake.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 10:01 AM
Sep 2015

It is usually an indicator that the driver is doing something that is not quiet legal. End result is that everyone with him pays the ultimate price. The driver should have stopped. Cops chase guys like this driver BECAUSE they run. If people knew that the cops wouldn't chase them, just imagine what would be happening on our roads everyday.
Think about it.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
11. When FASCISM comes to America it will come as blind support for police.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:09 AM
Sep 2015

Cops can chase them, just not at high speeds. A radio is a hell of a lot faster than a car.

Cops should weigh the risk to the people in the vehicle as well as other motorists versus the potential crime before engaging in high speed chases.

A cop in Texas sees an SUV packed with people, what "crime" does he suspect? Does that crime warrant putting all those people's lives at risk as well as others on the road?

If people knew cops wouldn't chase them, very little would change. Cops can get their vehicle ID and catch them later. Cops can radio ahead and coordinate an apprehension without high speed pursuit.

Hangingon

(3,071 posts)
20. This driver was most likely a coyote.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 02:28 PM
Sep 2015

The driver was most likely a coyote. According to the article, the passengers were Honduran and Guatemalan. Hwy 59 leads to Houston. These are pretty common chases around here. Most don't result in as many fatalities.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
23. Im sure this is not the reason for this chase...
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 04:33 PM
Sep 2015

But BY FAR the #1 reason people run from cops in high speed chases is they don't have proof of insurance...To me that is not worth risking people's lives over get the tag & meet them at their house/work/whatever.

There are only rare occasions when high speed chases should take place & that is when risking innocent life is necessary to save life...And that is very rare!

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
8. I see the authoritarians are all over this.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 10:53 AM
Sep 2015

Complete with uninformed speculation to justify police chases.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
15. Exactly, the law should learn to follow, not chase.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:15 AM
Sep 2015

What starts out as being 20 mph too fast increases rapidly as law enforcement closes the gap. Give them a little rope and keep them in sight, or depending on the roads, within range. The resources available to LE gives them a decisive advantage in time.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
25. And the backseat second guessers are all over it as well
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 05:20 PM
Sep 2015

Complete with uninformed speculation to bash the police.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
32. Way to broadbrush every officer
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 07:16 PM
Sep 2015

95% are hard working and decent.

those that aren't should be prosecuted.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
34. Then the "95%" better get to work arresting these scum.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 08:41 PM
Sep 2015

Until they do, they are no different than the assholes that daily murder and assault POC and other vulnerable blocks of the public.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
45. Absolutely not, and you know it.
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 10:50 AM
Sep 2015

Are we talking about Muslims or cops?
Or are you making the case that bad cops are the equivalent to ISIS or Al Quada?

cigsandcoffee

(2,300 posts)
46. What I'm saying is simple.
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 11:18 AM
Sep 2015

Your argument is that all police are tainted for the actions of a radical few, because it's up to them to cut out the cancer in their ranks.

Conservatives argue that all Muslims are tainted by the actions of a radical few, because it's up to them to cut out the cancer in their ranks.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
48. The problem is that it is not a 'few'
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 11:36 AM
Sep 2015

It is a systemic problem that encompasses leadership, recruiting, training, and the FOP among other things.
There is not a logical comparison to religious extremism, so your point is meaningless.
This is just another stratagem to avoid discussion of the rot that has infected our militarized police forces.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
14. Another effing petty violation. And I do not give a rip what
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:14 AM
Sep 2015

their legal status in the US is. This is wrong. Wonder what ages the dead were? Children?

valerief

(53,235 posts)
17. Wow, some cops must love killing people. I mean, what OTHER reason is there for doing
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 11:33 AM
Sep 2015

such a criminal, reckless thing? Imagine, putting all those lives on the road at risk, and for what? For HATE.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
21. Dangerously. Most would not have had seats, let alone seat belts
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 02:42 PM
Sep 2015
"Officers noted that the rear seat in the vehicle had been folded down and the middle seat had previously been removed, apparently to create more room in the vehicle," Wooldridge said.

And the handling of an Explorer with 15 people in it may explain why it flipped.
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
35. My Family once packed 12 people in a 1970 Datsun pickup....
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 08:47 PM
Sep 2015

Five in the cab:



The other 7 in the bed. Now it was two adults and one older teen in the front, with a six and seven year old on the two non driver's laps. The rest of us older kids were in the bed. It was a tight fit and the six and seven year old really wanted to be in the bed (more room).

Worse, this had a five speed on the floor manual transmission, which meant the teen in the middle had to make sure her legs were to her right not her front.

Just pointing out it is possible (Later on my Father purchased a Dodge Pickup then a Suburban as his income increased AND the older kids went away to Collage and ended up with their own cars.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
24. And how many other travelers were placed in danger
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 04:56 PM
Sep 2015

over the police's reckless behavior? Hwy 59 is busy.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
26. Shouldn't the primary blame go on the DRIVER?
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 05:21 PM
Sep 2015

You know, the person that drove away.

The person hauling 15 people in a car designed for 5?

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
36. I'm not saying the driver was blameless.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:25 PM
Sep 2015

But a high speed chase has consequences, too, sometimes with unrelated parties.

Could they have not alerted highway patrol further NE on the highway to intercept them?

I'd hate to hear that my family member was killed on Hwy 59 because the LEOs thought there were a few more illegal immigrants slipping through. Happens every day.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
28. It is fairly oblivious this was a vehicle transporting undocumented people, Edna is in South Texas,
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 05:42 PM
Sep 2015

Hwy 59 is the road to Houston, why did the driver not stop? Doubt it was because the driver did not have insurance or drivers license, it was because of the people in the vehicle. A few years ago a pickup truck had undocumented people, police tried to stop the vehicle, driver went very fast, had a blow out and several people died when the vehicle went off the road. These six lives could have been saved if the driver stopped, plain and simple.

markpkessinger

(8,395 posts)
37. Those lives could also have been saved . . .
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:33 PM
Sep 2015

. . . if the police had not given chase. The underlying notion seems to be that police MUST give chase, even if it means incurring the risks of a high-speed pursuit, for every possible violation they encounter. And that proposition is simply ludicrous.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
38. Don't transfer the blame of this wreck except on the driver, the police was not driving the vehicle.
Thu Sep 24, 2015, 09:59 PM
Sep 2015

The vehicle was not equipped with seat belts for every passenger, it is the responsibility of the driver not to move the vehicle without everyone in seat belts in Texas. The driver was in control of the vehicle, was reckless and perhaps was not capable of handling a vehicle at high speed. Dont overlook the facts here, an over crowded vehicle, ample number of seat belts and operating at too high of speed.

OakCliffDem

(1,274 posts)
40. If it had been a gun instead of an SUV, this would have been a mass shooting.
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 06:17 AM
Sep 2015

We have six people tragically killed in a confrontation. An individual used an object with intent, which resulted in several people being killed. Where is the outrage at the object?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»6 killed, 7 hurt when SUV...