Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:50 PM Sep 2015

Calcium From Supplements or Dairy Doesn't Strengthen Bones, Study Finds

Source: NBC NEWS

A new study should put the final nail in the coffin for any lingering beliefs that calcium supplements are good for you.

The new study finds that people over 50 don't get stronger bones either by taking supplements or from eating calcium-rich foods such as dairy products.

The findings, reported in the British Medical Journal's online publication BMJ.com, support what U.S. health officials have been telling Americans for a few years now — taking calcium supplements is not just a waste of time, but it could be harmful. The extra calcium doesn't go to strengthen bones but instead can build up in the arteries, causing heart disease, or in the kidneys, causing kidney stones.

snip

Most of the studies showed people over 50 get no benefit at all from taking either calcium supplements or from eating calcium in food. People were just as likely to have a fracture. A few studies showed that people who took calcium supplements might have a lower risk, but they were not very clear.

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/health/diet-fitness/calcium-supplements-or-dairy-doesnt-strengthen-bones-study-finds-n435726

83 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calcium From Supplements or Dairy Doesn't Strengthen Bones, Study Finds (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 OP
So what, if you're over 50 you're just screwed? 7962 Sep 2015 #1
Weight-bearing exercise. nt Codeine Sep 2015 #4
Good stuff get the red out Sep 2015 #35
+1 nt Javaman Sep 2015 #49
I love yoga and strength training class wordpix Sep 2015 #58
leafy greens and weight bearing exercise, they say. restorefreedom Sep 2015 #10
Organic dark leafy greens are high in magnesium, necessary for healthy bones. Eat lots of greens! Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #73
A minimum of 2000 IU of Vitamin daily. snagglepuss Sep 2015 #13
Well, at least I've got that covered. Been taking that for years 7962 Sep 2015 #14
Lungs as well. Not many people know that the lungs have specific snagglepuss Sep 2015 #20
I forgot about that! I've always called D "God's vitamin" 7962 Sep 2015 #39
And vitamin k2, as mk-7. nt SusanCalvin Sep 2015 #15
I think you mean 2,000 IU. Jim Lane Sep 2015 #26
Yes I meant IU. Thanks for pointing that out. I have made the correction. snagglepuss Sep 2015 #29
My ex wife was prescribed a 50K IU pill once a week! 7962 Sep 2015 #40
I was too, but only for a short time... mike_c Sep 2015 #67
vitamin D miscalculation Mosby Sep 2015 #63
better yet... roomtomove Sep 2015 #24
Havent seen a "study" showing any negatives for that! nt 7962 Sep 2015 #41
Huh? padfun Sep 2015 #2
good catch tomm2thumbs Sep 2015 #3
The key is "a few studies" and "might". Codeine Sep 2015 #5
I'm sure other experts will weigh in and find fault with how the snagglepuss Sep 2015 #21
the meta study where they considered all studies karynnj Sep 2015 #42
The dairy/bone strength correlation Codeine Sep 2015 #6
Really. Anyone drinking milk is either a cow, or not well informed. Gregorian Sep 2015 #9
Milk industry advertisement is powerful and people remember it. mucifer Sep 2015 #31
I still like a milkshake every so often. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #33
Soy dose a number in my get the red out Sep 2015 #36
Soy is a known hormone disruptor. Unfortunately since it is cheap due to GMO it is in a lot of Person 2713 Sep 2015 #64
I find it brings all the boys to the yard AngryAmish Oct 2015 #70
That's a good read but so many people do not want to listen even when you mention Person 2713 Sep 2015 #7
It's not just about calcium... Mona Sep 2015 #8
Bazinga! bananas Sep 2015 #16
the dairy calcium link has always been propoganda from the dairy industry restorefreedom Sep 2015 #11
And the supplement industry. SkyDaddy7 Sep 2015 #53
i think i have heard of that restorefreedom Sep 2015 #55
I suffered a spinal cord injury... SkyDaddy7 Sep 2015 #56
i think the vegan/vl diet is getting more popular restorefreedom Sep 2015 #57
Thanks...You too!! SkyDaddy7 Sep 2015 #61
thanks...go veggies! :) restorefreedom Sep 2015 #62
I'm vegan lite too, for the past 3 months, lost 30 lbs. No processed foods, lots of greens, veges, Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #74
Cool! SkyDaddy7 Oct 2015 #80
During my last physical my vitamin D level came back low tammywammy Oct 2015 #75
Yes there continues to be more info that multi-vitamins... SkyDaddy7 Oct 2015 #81
I'm only taking one pill a week for 13 weeks tammywammy Oct 2015 #83
...final nail in the coffin for any lingering beliefs... - maybe not the coffin they hope for Bearware Sep 2015 #12
Thanks for those links. I'll defintitely watch them. snagglepuss Sep 2015 #23
Calcium causes calcification of the arteries? Who knew? bananas Sep 2015 #17
Sorry, I take issue with your potshot at biologists. Pmc1962 Sep 2015 #19
Touche! Always interesting to read an informed rebuttal that doesn't mince words.. snagglepuss Sep 2015 #25
Much of that data is from pharmaceutical companies, 7962 Sep 2015 #44
Much of the data is from the NIH/NCCIH, not the pharmaceutical industry. Pmc1962 Sep 2015 #51
That's why you need to take Vit K2 lady lib Sep 2015 #28
So...no more Ben and Jerry's for me? d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #18
That's not what they said jmowreader Sep 2015 #22
Ben and Jerry's is coming out with vegan ice cream soon. mucifer Sep 2015 #32
No fucking way!! Codeine Sep 2015 #50
made with what? coconut or soy? wordpix Sep 2015 #59
We got that here but can't wait to taste B&J 's Person 2713 Sep 2015 #65
From the Harvard School of Public Health Not a Fan Sep 2015 #27
I wonder where extreme kicks in. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #34
That would be no where near extreme Person 2713 Sep 2015 #66
70 grams of protein a day helps to maintain muscle mass (as much as exercise) Midnight Writer Sep 2015 #30
The thing I have finally learned get the red out Sep 2015 #37
K2/MK-7, Vitamin D, and Magnesium Babel_17 Sep 2015 #38
Never heard of MK7 before this thread. 7962 Sep 2015 #43
Here's some tough news for people over 50: you're going to die. Vinca Sep 2015 #45
It's not 'natural' to die. It's a system bug. randome Sep 2015 #46
But will we be able to afford the pills? That is the question. Vinca Sep 2015 #47
really? I doubt it b/c death is a planetary imperative wordpix Sep 2015 #60
Best not to make those later years Codeine Sep 2015 #52
You need Vitamin D, calcium, zinc and especially magnesium Yo_Mama Sep 2015 #48
Hey can you elaborate on this at all or point to a resource? dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #68
If you are on PPI therapy (some people have to be) you should Yo_Mama Oct 2015 #71
Wow, thank you so much for that response dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #72
Nobody's monitoring - even endocrinologists don't do it. But Yo_Mama Oct 2015 #79
Thanks again dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #82
Those on certain insulin should be checked for potassium deficiency too REP Oct 2015 #76
You need magnesium to maintain potassium levels too TexasBushwhacker Oct 2015 #78
Considering these countries' longevity, overall health, I'd say this study is refutable. ancianita Sep 2015 #54
Doot, doot AngryAmish Oct 2015 #69
Weight bearing exercises are most helpful Aerows Oct 2015 #77

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
10. leafy greens and weight bearing exercise, they say.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:34 PM
Sep 2015

at least that is what sanjay gupta said this morning

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
13. A minimum of 2000 IU of Vitamin daily.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:51 PM
Sep 2015

Vitamin D is essential for strong bones and the recommended daily allowance found in pills does not provide enough nor does being in sunshine, in fact vitamin D deficiency is extremely common through-out the southern states..

Google Reinhold Vieth's Vitamin D research. Vieth is a professor in the Departments of Nutritional Sciences, Laboratory Medicine, and Pathobiology, Bone and Mineral Laboratory, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
14. Well, at least I've got that covered. Been taking that for years
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:59 PM
Sep 2015

Also heard it was good for colon health and my colonoscopy was perfect!

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
20. Lungs as well. Not many people know that the lungs have specific
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 12:18 AM
Sep 2015

receptors for Vitamin D. In fact one study showed that a high number of children who visited one ER with pneumonia had low levels of Vitamin D. It is really fascinating to read just how important Vitamin D is as it is used in so many different ways by the body.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
39. I forgot about that! I've always called D "God's vitamin"
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 07:48 AM
Sep 2015

Much to the chagrin of some folks, I'm sure.
But its the one major vitamin that your body makes on its own and the sun is what lets you do it. Granted, you still may need extra. Someone like me for example. I have vitiligo, so I wear long sleeves even in summer, and I wear sunscreen when most people dont even think about it.
I'm willing to give natural stuff a try before taking a drug for sure. Not a lot of side effects. Although some stuff can be so darn expensive!

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
26. I think you mean 2,000 IU.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 01:17 AM
Sep 2015

For Vitamin D, one IU (International Unit) is the biological equivalent of 0.025 μg (μg = microgram = one one-millionth of a gram). Your suggested 2,000 mg = 2 grams = 2,000,000 one-millionths of a gram = 80,000,000 IU. Typical supplements have only 1,000 or 2,000 IU.

A complication is that there may be toxicity to high levels of Vitamin D supplementation. One study suggested that the tolerable upper intake level (the highest daily intake of the nutrient that is likely to pose no risk) might be as low as 4,000 IU, but admitted that there is uncertainty on the subject. As against that, some nutritionists recommend getting 5,000 IU a day or even more. As against that, I think that some of the scientists reaching this conclusion were financed by supplement manufacturers.

For a species that can land a probe on a comet, it's amazing how much uncertainty we still confront concerning some fairly basic questions about our own nutritional needs.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
29. Yes I meant IU. Thanks for pointing that out. I have made the correction.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 02:04 AM
Sep 2015

Those researching it tend to take more, for instance a researcher at Queens University takes 4000 IU's daily during the winter. Vieth takes 10000 IU daily, the amount of vitamin D a human would absorb being in the sun for 8 hours.

The key is to be tested. I have always commuted daily by bike and until I read about Vitamin D,I had assumed that my being outside so much my levels would be fine however after testing my levels I found out that was was deficient.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
67. I was too, but only for a short time...
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 07:36 PM
Sep 2015

...then switched to 5,000 IU daily. Been taking it for years now. People just don't spend enough time naked outdoors in equatorial sunlight anymore.

padfun

(1,790 posts)
2. Huh?
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:56 PM
Sep 2015
"Most of the studies showed people over 50 get no benefit at all from taking either calcium supplements or from eating calcium in food. People were just as likely to have a fracture. A few studies showed that people who took calcium supplements might have a lower risk"


So which is it? No benefit AT ALL, or Might have a lower risk? It's either one or the other.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
3. good catch
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 09:57 PM
Sep 2015

I guess they are playing all the numbers on the roulette table and hoping something hits

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
5. The key is "a few studies" and "might".
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:01 PM
Sep 2015

Overall the meta-study found it probably did nothing.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
21. I'm sure other experts will weigh in and find fault with how the
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 12:21 AM
Sep 2015

study was done and its conclusions. This won't be the last word.

karynnj

(59,507 posts)
42. the meta study where they considered all studies
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 07:57 AM
Sep 2015

Found no benefit. Some of the underlying studies had found small improvements.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
9. Really. Anyone drinking milk is either a cow, or not well informed.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:27 PM
Sep 2015


Funny, since magnesium deficiency is far more prevalent than calcium deficiency.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
33. I still like a milkshake every so often.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 06:49 AM
Sep 2015

And the soy or almond milks have just never worked for it for me.

Person 2713

(3,263 posts)
7. That's a good read but so many people do not want to listen even when you mention
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:13 PM
Sep 2015

heart trouble. They have been convinced for so long esp the dairy industry yes
Now I mention magnesium and people say no I don't take that with my calcium That's what they should take alone and are likely low in
IMO
also so many food products are calcium fortified
However lacking or no calcium iin your diet can cause kidney stones too

Mona

(135 posts)
8. It's not just about calcium...
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:26 PM
Sep 2015

Calcium needs to be balanced with the other cofactors/minerals: http://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2012/8/Potential-Danger-Of-Calcium-Supplements/Page-01

Additionally, most of these main stream studies with supplements are poorly designed and/or controlled, and reported with a distinct bias. This is an old article, but it highlights some of the issues: http://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2006/6/cover_media/Page-01

ETA: with the amount of phosphorous that the typical american ingests (often from soda alone), it's common sense that we are generally calcium deficient. The question is what is the best way to balance that additional calcium. Having a mom with osteoporosis that we managed for years with a supplement program, I'll opt for a well-rounded supplement program any day.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
11. the dairy calcium link has always been propoganda from the dairy industry
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:41 PM
Sep 2015

recent studies are now shedding light on the truth. For example vegans, or other people who don't consume a lot of dairy, don't have high rates of osteoporosis. One possible reason is that they are getting less protein and protein tends to leach calcium from the body. Another school of thought says that high meat diets acidify the blood, increasing the risk.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christiane-northrup/osteoporosis-treatment-a_b_585528.html

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
53. And the supplement industry.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:10 AM
Sep 2015

Very few are worth taking one can get everything they need by eating correctly. The problem is folks want to eat shit & pop some pills & feel healthy.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
55. i think i have heard of that
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:33 AM
Sep 2015

the pop tart diet....


the other sad thing is that modern foods are sometimes lacking in high nutritional value due to poor soil conditions, etc. but i agree that we should be getting nutrients from food as the primary source. the big exception is vegans who need b12.


SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
56. I suffered a spinal cord injury...
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 11:12 AM
Sep 2015

after playing soccer my entire life...While in top shape diet was all about carbs to me & did not have to worry about weight gain. Needless to say after my SCI I put on a lot of weight. I'm 5'9 and weighed 185 with a 30" waist prior to my SCI then shot to 240lbs & knew something had to be done.

I jumped on what many of the Pro Athletes are moving to Vegan (Lite) lifestyle which is Vegan with small portions of chicken & seafood a few times a week...I eat clams, shrimp, Salmon, oysters, etc., which is packed with b-12.
(Some of the athletes are total Vegan & some "Lite" but both incorporate pastas & tons more carbs I DON'T because I can't burn them)
I eat no processed foods, meats, drink only water & black coffee...I eat tons of different salads, various veggies that I love to cook in many different ways or snack on raw, FRUIT & I eat TONS of nuts!!

Started 3yrs ago & without being able to exercise I weigh 155lbs & I am very closely monitored by family doctor & a team of spinal rehab doctors at the Shepherd Center in Atlanta & 2 different doctors at the Shepherd Pain Institute in Atlanta. All my physicals have been improving since late 2012 & the one last month was really good.

It is hard at first to break away from the garbage & quick processed food we have been addicted to but once you get a routine down find things you like it becomes normal & you really do feel better.

People don't believe you can lose weight without exercise but you can it just takes a long time & a VERY DISCIPLINED lifestyle. No cheating at all because your body will store that crap as fat.

Edit: I do take one supplement 5000 IU Vitamin D...I can't go out in the sun due to Neuropathic pain issues & medication & my D levels had dropped low now they are well within normal.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
57. i think the vegan/vl diet is getting more popular
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 11:26 AM
Sep 2015

the health benefits are tough to beat. i try and avoid processed as well. and i always feel better when i keep the carbs low. i do like rice but don't eat a lot of it at once

i was told to take d and i watch the b12 as well. i am also a smoothie freak. i could almost live on fruit and veggie smoothies with protein powder and soymilk.

the discipline part is hard with today's hectic lifestyle and marketing of crap foods. but i think people are starting to get on board.

all the best to you for continued health and improvement

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
74. I'm vegan lite too, for the past 3 months, lost 30 lbs. No processed foods, lots of greens, veges,
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:04 PM
Oct 2015

whole herbs, fermented foods, olive and coconut oils, raw nuts, very minimalist on meat, hard boiled organic eggs.

My BS, BP and cholesterol are going down to near normal.

I did sneak a few junkie foods but felt crappy.

Good for you SkyDaddy7 keep on going!

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
75. During my last physical my vitamin D level came back low
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:21 PM
Oct 2015

I was telling my dad and then he was trying to convince me to take a daily multivitamin. I told him "all you do with that is pee it out". I kept telling him that they're pointless. I mean if he wants to keep on with his daily Centrum Silver, by all means okay. But when I say "no, there's no reason to", don't keep telling me to.

Guess what, still not taking a multivitamin. I'm taking vitamin D for 12 weeks and then I'll get retested.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
81. Yes there continues to be more info that multi-vitamins...
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 06:37 AM
Oct 2015

Are not worth taking for most people...Eating properly is where you get your daily vitamins. However, vitamin D is one of those rare supplements that the body will absorb & use properly people who's levels are low should take. It may take getting tested a couple of times over a period of time to get your dosage correct. DO NOT take a lot it can be toxic!!!

I would not take anymore than 3000 IU a day until you get tested to see where your levels are. That is just be very safe.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
83. I'm only taking one pill a week for 13 weeks
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 08:29 AM
Oct 2015

It says it's 50,000u. He added the vitamin D test a few years ago to the regular physical. I've had to take it before.

Bearware

(151 posts)
12. ...final nail in the coffin for any lingering beliefs... - maybe not the coffin they hope for
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:50 PM
Sep 2015

The following video shows in diagrammatic form what is really happening.

http://www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=29081
If you are in a hurry skip ahead to 28:00
The entire video is very informative on how studies like that referenced in the op are designed.

For more context watch:
http://www.ucsd.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=29077

bananas

(27,509 posts)
17. Calcium causes calcification of the arteries? Who knew?
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:19 PM
Sep 2015

From the article:

The extra calcium doesn't go to strengthen bones but instead can build up in the arteries, causing heart disease, or in the kidneys, causing kidney stones.


This is actually a very complex issue - trying to blame one mineral is like trying to blame the letter "a" for all bad grammar. And that's what many of these studies do - they try to isolate a single variable over too wide a range of effects.

Most biologists are functionally illiterate when it comes to mathematics - and logic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiff_equation

In mathematics, a stiff equation is a differential equation for which certain numerical methods for solving the equation are numerically unstable, unless the step size is taken to be extremely small. It has proven difficult to formulate a precise definition of stiffness, but the main idea is that the equation includes some terms that can lead to rapid variation in the solution.


Pmc1962

(43 posts)
19. Sorry, I take issue with your potshot at biologists.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 11:38 PM
Sep 2015

My late husband was a cell biologist.

Biologists, as do most scientists, know way more about math and statistics than most people.

Isolating variables and doing statistical analysis is a huge part of their research. Scientists are incredibly logical, sometimes to an extreme degree. They assess and interpret data all day long.

Insulting them is not only uncalled for but unnecessary and off topic.

And, quite frankly, the data on supplements has shown them, consistently and over many years, to be close to worthless. Follow the data.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
44. Much of that data is from pharmaceutical companies,
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:05 AM
Sep 2015

who have a great interest in getting people to take medicine instead of something natural that they cant make a ton of money off of.
I guess you would dispute the info from Harvard Med mentioned in post #27?
I'm sure some of the people I've known who found help with supplements may be affected by the "placebo effect", but if they got better who cares? But I've seen swollen legs go away and people gain mobility from adding certain supplements to their diet. I'm not gonna tell them they're wasting their money.

Pmc1962

(43 posts)
51. Much of the data is from the NIH/NCCIH, not the pharmaceutical industry.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 09:59 AM
Sep 2015

The supplement industry is no more trustworthy that the pharmaceutical industry, only less regulated. (Links below about the trustworthiness of the supplement industry. They aren't comprehensive but I could find them in 15 seconds. I also threw in a few studies on effects of supplementation.)

There is nothing natural about supplements, which are manufactured products which come out of a factory. They are not a salad.

Read the Harvard link carefully for data versus recommendation. Basically, it says:

1. There is data that low Vit D levels and illness are correlated. But, as is often stated, correlation is not causation. Did the low levels cause the illness, did the illness cause the low levels or did neither cause the other?

2. There is no data that supplementing fixes the problem or treats the diseases.

3. There is data that supplementing aggressively causes more harm than good.

There have been multiple observations regarding low levels of various nutrients in illnesses. There is almost zero support for supplementing those nutrients. Most data has shown supplements either don't do anything or cause harm.

Eat a salad, go outside, exercise. My mother was right.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/sidebar-whats-in-those-supplements/?_r=0
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/safety-of-herbal-supplements-pulls-prosecutors-together/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25775274
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/37/8/2123/suppl/DC1

lady lib

(2,933 posts)
28. That's why you need to take Vit K2
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 01:52 AM
Sep 2015

in either the short acting MK4 or long acting MK7 form. The K2 moves the calcium from the arteries to the bones and teeth. Then you also need a magnesium supplement to help the vitamin D to do its job.
I take 4000 IU of D3 (because I'm trying to raise my blood level of D) + 90 mcg of MK7 + magnesium malate every day.

jmowreader

(50,569 posts)
22. That's not what they said
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 12:26 AM
Sep 2015

Eat all the Ben and Jerry's you want. Just don't expect it to make your bones stronger.

Not a Fan

(98 posts)
27. From the Harvard School of Public Health
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 01:31 AM
Sep 2015

Vitamin D and Health
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/vitamin-d

There is a lot of good information here. When restoring Vitamin D3 levels, VD3 maximizes your calcium impact X4. For this reason it is recommended that you NOT take calcium when taking VD - beyond dietary calcium - unless you are under the care of a physician who has you taking it.

Vitamin D3 is all about bone and muscle health. I'll mention that while there is definitely a place for treatment with single high-dose VD3 to cover a long time period - experts feel this is not the best way to take it - that it is less effective.

***********************************

"Vitamin D and Bone and Muscle Strength

Several studies link low vitamin D levels with an increased risk of fractures in older adults, and they suggest that vitamin D supplementation may prevent such fractures—as long as it is taken in a high enough dose. (9–13)

A summary of the evidence comes from a combined analysis of 12 fracture prevention trials that included more than 40,000 elderly people, most of them women. Researchers found that high intakes of vitamin D supplements—of about 800 IU per day—reduced hip and non-spine fractures by 20 percent, while lower intakes (400 IU or less) failed to offer any fracture prevention benefit. (13)

Vitamin D may also help increase muscle strength, which in turn helps to prevent falls, a common problem that leads to substantial disability and death in older people. (14–16) Once again, vitamin D dose matters: A combined analysis of multiple studies found that taking 700 to 1,000 IU of vitamin D per day lowered the risk of falls by 19 percent, but taking 200 to 600 IU per day did not offer any such protection. (17)

A recent vitamin D trial drew headlines for its unexpected finding that a very high dose of vitamin D increased fracture and fall risk in older women. (18) The trial’s vitamin D dose—500,000 IU taken in a once-a-year pill—was much higher than previously tested in an annual regimen. After up to 5 years of treatment, women in the vitamin D group had a 15 percent higher fall risk and a 26 percent higher fracture risk than women who received the placebo.

It’s possible that giving the vitamin D in one large dose, rather than in several doses spread throughout the year, led to the increased risk. (18) The study authors note that only one other study—also a high-dose, once-a-year regimen—found vitamin D to increase fracture risk; no other studies have found vitamin D to increase the risk of falls. Furthermore, there’s strong evidence that more moderate doses of vitamin D taken daily or weekly protect against fractures and falls—and are safe.

So what is the significance of this study for people who want to take vitamin D supplements? A reasonable conclusion would be to continue taking moderate doses of vitamin D regularly, since these have a strong safety record, but to avoid extremely high single doses. This recent finding does present a challenge to scientists who will work to understand why the extreme single dose appears to have adverse effects."

Midnight Writer

(21,822 posts)
30. 70 grams of protein a day helps to maintain muscle mass (as much as exercise)
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 02:11 AM
Sep 2015

in folks over 50. More muscle mass gives support to the skeleton so that even if the bones weaken, the muscles will take up the slack.

Best practice; 70 grams or more of protein daily, stay active and work the core muscles through daily walking, balance and strength training, and control excessive weight.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
37. The thing I have finally learned
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 07:01 AM
Sep 2015

Everybody's body is different. I don't bother with calcium because I enjoy dairy, no matter what I eat someone will basically see me as a dietary heretic. No one can win with everybody on nutritional choices, I used to be that way myself. I became what I used to despise this summer and dropped 28 lbs. and my knees stopped hurting. I feel I get what I need from my food, but if someone feels more secure taking calcium, NBD.

Vinca

(50,320 posts)
45. Here's some tough news for people over 50: you're going to die.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:28 AM
Sep 2015

We're all going to die. There is no magic pill that creates eternal health or eternal youth. Nature will win in the end.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
46. It's not 'natural' to die. It's a system bug.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:36 AM
Sep 2015

We're getting closer every day to solving the disease of death.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.
[/center][/font][hr]

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
60. really? I doubt it b/c death is a planetary imperative
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 11:38 AM
Sep 2015

for living organisms. Every living thing dies, plants, insects, animals. What makes you think we can 'solve" such reality?

And frankly, having seen what my elderly parents went through in old age, I'm not excited about living long.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
52. Best not to make those later years
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:02 AM
Sep 2015

a cumulative health nightmare, however. Healthy lifestyle choices can make that time much more pleasant.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
48. You need Vitamin D, calcium, zinc and especially magnesium
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:43 AM
Sep 2015

Also exercise and any needed treatment for inadequate circulation.

If you don't look at all four in the title, supplementing the others doesn't work. Calcium and magnesium have to be in balance in the body to rebuild and maintain bone.

However, if you get all four in balance, the supplements do work and do increase bone mass. Magnesium is often never even tested for - the insurance companies waged a war against magnesium testing, and won.

In patients with undiagnosed low magnesium levels, you often see recurrent lows of Vitamin D that don't respond to supplementation. Also you can generate insulin resistance - the cause is restricted microvascular circulation.

I think antacids and proton pump inhibitors are causing a lot of disease.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
68. Hey can you elaborate on this at all or point to a resource?
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 04:55 AM
Oct 2015

I've been reading this thread especially because I have been and am on long-term (years) proton pump inhibitors after an endoscopy found esophagal pre-cancerous damage (they call it Barrett's esophasgus). I am wondering what I need to do to minimize damage from the inhibitors. Iideally I'd get off of the inhibitors, though that doesn't look likely.

Anyway, I am wondering about things like D and bone mass problems, I have muscle issues now too that I didn't used to have, and your post looked interesting. I also hadn't heard about K2 or MK7 before this thread.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
71. If you are on PPI therapy (some people have to be) you should
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 02:53 PM
Oct 2015

be tested at least yearly for magnesium and the standard chem which does include stuff like potassium and calcium.

At the clinic we advise virtually everyone on PPI therapy to take a calcium/zinc/mag supplement daily. Something like Slow-Mag. But the supplements don't work for everyone, especially since if you get too low you will develop additional malabsorption problems.

FDA links about PPI therapy:
(hypomagnesia)
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm245011.htm

podcast:
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/DrugSafetyPodcasts/ucm246866.htm

In Germany, there was a case of a young man in his twenties who developed neurological problems and acute tetany caused by PPIs.

Tetany (spastic or cramping muscles) is a serious side effect, but the cardiac problems and in some patients, breathing problems can be quickly lethal.

If for any reason you are on diuretics also, you may need to be tested every six months or even every three months. Print the FDA thing out and take it to your doctor. If you are tested and you are low you may need an EKG and multiple retests to ensure that the problem is corrected.

In persons with a family history of Type II diabetes and/or CV disease the concerns are more acute and H1AC levels should be tested with the magnesium and blood chemistry. Just the serum glucose alone is not enough.

Good luck; don't ignore this.

In the clinic we have reversed several cases of severe TII diabetes at a young age just with the combined therapy including magnesium, and one case of acute supraventricular tachycardia. The effect of PPIs seem very individual. We have also seen bone mass increase without the standard therapies, and several cases of people who just could not maintain decent Vitamin D levels were reversed as well. So this is a real problem - how prevalent it is is unknown, unfortunately.


dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
72. Wow, thank you so much for that response
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 05:39 PM
Oct 2015

Kaiser, who put me on the PPI, does not monitor those levels, or I didn't know enough to get them to. I have been struggling with the muscle spasm/cramping issues, pretty severe out of the blue events that come and go, with no clue they could be related to the PPI, also rando electtrical firing pin-prick symptoms, perhaps unrelatedd. I can live with these things but getting at their cause would be much better, I'll definitely pursue this with my doctor. Also my family history includes the two risk groups you mention. Thanks again.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
79. Nobody's monitoring - even endocrinologists don't do it. But
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 10:40 PM
Oct 2015

we have known since the 1980s that low magnesium levels create insulin resistance even in young healthy people, and this is a gap in care.

Also, most people with the family history of Type II diabetes will develop high blood sugars after eating long before the serum fasting glucose will pop high, and higher blood sugars make the kidneys dump water, which then prevents the kidneys from recirculating to capture magnesium.

Low magnesium makes diabetics see higher blood sugars. It's a nasty downward spiral and there are people with genetics that make them more or less prone to developing hypomagnesia.

With that family history, I think you need to discuss this seriously with your doctor.

Some background:
http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/5/568.full

Magnesium/insulin resistance:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10726923?dopt=Abstract

Vascular disease, insulin resistance, low magnesium:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505087?dopt=Abstract

IN the last link, the angiotensins are produced because the body responds to lower magnesium levels by tightening up the blood vessels to reduce blood flow to preserve magnesium for the central (heart, lungs). This raises blood pressure, and produces poor peripheral circulation. Because glucose storage in muscle is one of the primary glucose stabilizers, over a long period of time in some people with what we believe to be certain genetic traits, this produces a type of acquired McArdles similar to what is seen in some alcoholics. The body often compensates for this by raising carrying blood sugar levels, so adequate amounts of fuel get through to the circulation-constricted regions. It also raises cholesterol and triglyceride levels.

We believe that the very white skin and low Vitamin D levels seen in many of these individuals are produced by poor microvascular circulation, which would also produce poor intestinal absorption.

In these families, early development of peripheral neuropathy and perhaps autonomic neuropathy may arise from constricted circulation.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161260/

However, the calcium and magnesium channels are related, and just dosing people with calcium alone can reduce magnesium absorption. Thus I would not expect calcium supplements alone to be very healthy.

There is also a strong relationship between low magnesium levels and chronic low potassium (hypokalemia).
http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/18/10/2649.full






REP

(21,691 posts)
76. Those on certain insulin should be checked for potassium deficiency too
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:27 PM
Oct 2015

I'm a non-diabetic kidney disease kidney patient, and for years have been diligent to manage hyperkalemia, so imagine my surprise after years of maintaining normal K levels, I was being pumped full of potassium in the hospital because I was very hypokalemic. Took about a month to figure out it was due to the switch in insulin (Humulin N to Lantus).

TexasBushwhacker

(20,228 posts)
78. You need magnesium to maintain potassium levels too
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:48 PM
Oct 2015

You can eat all the bananas on the tree, but if you don't get enough magnesium, your sodium potassium balance will still be out of whack.

ancianita

(36,180 posts)
54. Considering these countries' longevity, overall health, I'd say this study is refutable.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:20 AM
Sep 2015

Also consider their additional diets which may or may not contain calcium-rich greens, or their exercise regimens which may or may not include weight bearing activity.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
77. Weight bearing exercises are most helpful
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 07:32 PM
Oct 2015

but the chances that I will give up milk, my beloved cottage cheese, sour cream and cheese in general is nil.

I have HDL cholesterol levels of 110. You don't get good cholesterol level like that without exercise and eating right.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Calcium From Supplements ...