Nation's largest teachers union endorses Clinton for president
Source: Politico
AP Photo
Nation's largest teachers union endorses Clinton for president
The National Education Association endorsement comes amid grumbling from some members that it's too soon.
By Kimberly Hefling
10/03/15 02:12 PM EDT
The National Education Association defied some of its state affiliates Saturday with an endorsement of Hillary Clinton for president, which came after an in-person, closed-door conversation between members and Clinton herself.
This is exactly the right time if youre going to impact the primaries, NEA President Lily Eskelsen García told POLITICO after about 75 percent of the 175-member NEA board voted to endorse Clinton.
Eskelsen García called it a resounding endorsement, adding: If we want to have educations voice in this primary debate, you get involved now.
Clinton praised the NEA and teachers in general in a statement after the endorsement was announced. I know from personal experience that a teacher can make a profound difference in a childs life, Clinton said...........
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/clinton-nea-teachers-union-endorsement-214402#ixzz3nXp6opd0
stuffmatters
(2,574 posts)A big union issue. So,one hand washes the other.
Prior to this way early endorsement,(this union didn't endorse tll after nominations in 2008) wonder if they asked Clinton where she stands on charter schools & Wall Street's relentless privatization of our national educational system. Or if they asked Clinton if she opposed the anti-union TPP/TISA. Doubt it.
"""""closed-door conversation between members and Clinton herself.""""
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)Randi Weingarten and 2 others Retweeted
Hillary Clinton Verified account @HillaryClinton 2h2 hours ago
Grateful to have @NEAtoday on Team Hillary. Educators are the frontline fighters building a stronger America. http://hrc.io/1M1z2Bk
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)No matter how hard you study, no matter how hard you work, the American family will never get ahead as long as Wall Street owned politicians like Clinton and Bush keep sending jobs to low wage hell holes in Asia.
Thanks NEA. This endorsement is a slap in the face of students across the country struggling to get out of the poverty brought on by the conservative economic policies endorsed by Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates, Arne Duncan and the Third Way.
pampango
(24,692 posts)The world is full of poor people. We need a candidate who will make America great again with unilateral actions like border walls and higher tariffs rather than negotiating with other countries.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)because workers wanted to raise the minimum wage. Now there's a secretary of state who fights for the hand that feeds her.
Just because China India et al decide to sacrifice their workforce to work in shitty unregulated conditions, doesn't mean we have to let
the corporations keep the profits from that activity tax free.
Well, unless you are Hillary Clinton, that is.
As far as walls, Hillary has already helped build a massive wall that keeps rich and poor far apart - it even has a clever name, Wall Street.
pampango
(24,692 posts)Trade with Mexico, China and any other country Trump does not like? Slap a tariff on them. (Leave it to President Trump to handle the details of legality and international repercussions.) It like bringing Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover back to life and causing FDR to roll over in his grave.
Trump never, never suggests negotiating any international agreement regarding working conditions, environmental issues or any other issue under the sun. He wants the US to be great again by acting unilaterally and forcing other countries to do what the US wants them to do. Negotiating mutually acceptable solutions is not something he talks about.
Obama, Kerry and Clinton have all been involved in important international negotiations on all of these issues and more like Iran, Cuba, etc. I trust all the Democratic candidates to negotiate international issues rather than acting unilaterally.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Because, you know, we have too many jobs and wealth in the US.
Meanwhile we start wars in Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, and just about anywhere there's oil around is also a good Democratic Party value.
Sure is hard to figure out what is and is not a good Democratic value.
By the way, where is the tax money from google, apple, amazon, et al?
Wasn't it supposed to lift wages and quality of life in US? Or are you saying lowering quality of life in US is also a good Democratic Party value.
Do you have too much wealth, education, health care and family security in your life?
pampango
(24,692 posts)Germany and Sweden and every other progressive country in the world trade much more than we do - 2 to 3 times as much. They all have stronger unions, better safety nets, higher wages and much better income equality. If trade caused problems for the middle and lower class, Germany and Sweden would be "hell holes" rather than the US which trades relatively little.
When FDR lowered the high tariffs he inherited from Coolidge and Hoover, he did not do it because we had "too many jobs and wealth in the US". He did it to create "jobs and wealth in the US" and used the tax system, safety net and corporate regulation to make sure that the benefits were shared. (Progressive countries do the same today.) He followed the same principle when he created the IMF, World Bank and International Trade Organization (which GATT was a part of).
FDR did not raise tariffs or act unilaterally against other countries. He negotiated with them to lower tariffs and later created international organizations to systematize international trade rules and make it more difficult for future Coolidges and Hoovers (like Trump), in the US or elsewhere, to act unilaterally.
No. Neither do Swedes and Germans. They somehow manage to keep their countries from becoming 'hell holes' even though trade and trade agreements are a much bigger part of their lives than they are in the lives of Americans.
What Trump does not realize, because he is no progressive, is that the above countries have high, progressive taxes; protect and strengthen unions rather than push "right-to-work" laws; regulate their corporations effectively; and have strong and effective safety nets. They have not achieved progressive societies by blaming foreigners or using walls and tariffs. Trump probably understands that no country has created a progressive society by means of walls and tariffs. My guess is he does not care. A macho politician has to act macho.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)EVERY so often, you hear grotesquely wealthy American chief executives announce in sanctimonious tones the intention to use their accumulated hundreds of millions, or billions, to lift people out of poverty. Sometimes they are referring to Africans, but sometimes they are referring to Americans. And heres the funny thing about that: In most cases, they have made their fortunes by impoverishing whole American communities, having outsourced their manufacturing to China or India, Vietnam or Mexico.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/opinion/sunday/the-hypocrisy-of-helping-the-poor.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=opinion-c-col-top-region®ion=opinion-c-col-top-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-top-region
trillion
(1,859 posts)she makes it to be the one. That said, lets hope this DINO doesn't make it.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)that is very different than the union as a whole. many teachers are backing bernie and om. and we know union leadership no longer speaks for the workers, they ally themselves with the elite.
getting a board endorsement is nice, in the same way that getting a ceo endorsement is nice. but it doesn't represent the working people.
hillary will keep getting the nods of the powerful. bernie will get the nods of the people. who do we think exists in greater numbers?
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)State officials and rank-and-file members plan to protest ...
... labor is deeply divided between candidates.
In this case, the Vermont-NEA has already endorsed Sanders, ...
At the PAC Council meeting Thursday, Massachusetts plans to "vote against an early candidate recommendation,"
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-teachers-union-214190#ixzz3nc6BaZNy
bekkilyn
(454 posts)Seems that they're just as corrupt as the billionaire privatizers that are determined to destroy public education.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)At some point we should stop pretending that the anti-Hillary wing of the party is "pro-union" http://demu.gr/1251646084 #p2 #wiunion
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)with nothing in the thread substantiating his claims
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I'll ask them about this endorsement next time we hang out
pampango
(24,692 posts)And this is DU. Wonder if the NEA will get much love from the GOP?
trillion
(1,859 posts)because most of the teachers I know are educated and wouldn't be endorsing Clinton.