Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:21 PM Dec 2015

Weapons in San Bernardino Shootings Were Legally Obtained

Source: New York Times

The suspects in the San Bernardino shootings used semiautomatic rifles that were legally obtained despite gun laws in California that were intended to ban assault weapons and are widely regarded as among the strictest in the country.

The rifles were variants of the popular AR-15, the semiautomatic civilian version of a military M-16. They are surprisingly easy to acquire in California, though they come with limitations aimed at curbing their ability to inflict mass damage. Semiautomatic rifles, for instance, cannot have magazines that hold more than 10 bullets or can be quickly removed.

However, such limitations can be easily, if illegally, bypassed. For instance, a 10-bullet magazine can be quickly removed by pressing the tip of a loose bullet into a recessed button, allowing for a high-capacity magazine to be inserted in its place. This release feature — called a “bullet button” — is installed, legally, by gun manufacturers on rifles sold in California; the high-capacity magazine is illegal in the state.

Other restricted features, like pistol grips and folding stocks — which allow greater control of the weapon while firing for a long period of time — can also be added to some guns after their sale.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/weapons-in-san-bernardino-shootings-were-legally-obtained.html



Real gun restrictions are coming, gun fetishists.

The tipping point approacheth...
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weapons in San Bernardino Shootings Were Legally Obtained (Original Post) onehandle Dec 2015 OP
Ok, so let me ask this. RandySF Dec 2015 #1
I know! Plucketeer Dec 2015 #2
But the deaths of little children and black churchgoes couldn't do it starroute Dec 2015 #3
Just like the pictures of Black Panthers with guns central scrutinizer Dec 2015 #8
The article doesn't indicate if any of the actual recovered weapons branford Dec 2015 #4
True. Igel Dec 2015 #6
It is quite difficult to modify an AR-15 to full auto. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #11
Preach it my brother! ileus Dec 2015 #5
So the problem isn't with "gun laws." The problem is guns. PSPS Dec 2015 #7
there aren't much restrictions towards getting guns legally. patsimp Dec 2015 #9
There are plenty of restrictions. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #12
these two terrorists were law abiding until them became cold blooded killers patsimp Dec 2015 #13
True. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #14
Relatively few restrictions. LanternWaste Dec 2015 #15
True about the perception of few/many. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #16
You might be right Android3.14 Dec 2015 #10

RandySF

(58,884 posts)
1. Ok, so let me ask this.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:27 PM
Dec 2015

Which existing law are the gun nuts going to point to and say wasn't enforced? Because there's always some obscure subsection that wasn't followed so, thus, we don't need any additional gun control measures.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
2. I know!
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:37 PM
Dec 2015

They forgot to sign up with the local well regulated militia! Had they done that, this debacle never would've happened.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
3. But the deaths of little children and black churchgoes couldn't do it
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:51 PM
Dec 2015

If genuine gun restrictions do result from this, it will be because the gun nuts suddenly realize that honest-to-gosh Islamic terrorists can acquire guns in this country as easily as your friendly neighborhood white supremacist. And that's really sad.

central scrutinizer

(11,650 posts)
8. Just like the pictures of Black Panthers with guns
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 10:43 PM
Dec 2015

Led St. Ronnie Raygun to ask for gun control when he was governor

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
4. The article doesn't indicate if any of the actual recovered weapons
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 10:02 PM
Dec 2015

had the California legal restrictions bypassed.

There's also no mention about the pipe bombs...

Igel

(35,317 posts)
6. True.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 10:24 PM
Dec 2015

It doesn't help that most of the articles I've seen (not many, I admit) insist on using "assault rifle" with the implication that those AR-15s were selective fire.

Apparently it's not hard to modify AR-15s to make them fully automatic. Haven't heard about any mods.

One doesn't turn on one's own community; it's very easy to turn on members of a community one views as being in opposition. Very few things in American political or religious discourse involve building larger communities; mostly they're involved in building balkanized communities for political points or to reinforce boundaries and group membership/identity. "Us versus them" is the status quo for a lot of people, and they're always seeking new enemies and new "thems" to contrast with the all-important "us."

Not going to end well, I suspect. Such societies can't be democracies. They require Husseins, Assads, Titos, Putins to hold together; at the very best in the event of no clear majority the subjugation is voluntary, "If I can't have X then I approve of the government making sure nobody has X"--as often is the case in Russia.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
11. It is quite difficult to modify an AR-15 to full auto.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:18 AM
Dec 2015
Apparently it's not hard to modify AR-15s to make them fully automatic.


You need a machine shop and the correct skills.
It is illegal to sell any gun in the USA that can be "easily" modified to full auto.

Expecting the cops and reporters to correctly use the terms "assault weapon" vs "assault rifle" is just a waste of time.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
12. There are plenty of restrictions.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:20 AM
Dec 2015

It just happens that most law-abiding, not-crazy people meet the requirements.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
15. Relatively few restrictions.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:17 PM
Dec 2015

Relatively few restrictions. I except though, the perception of 'few' or 'many' rests on the denial or acceptance of sacred cows.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
16. True about the perception of few/many.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 05:22 PM
Dec 2015

List the restrictions you have found. Let's see if you have them all.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Weapons in San Bernardino...