Islamic State militant 'executes own mother' in Raqqa
Source: BBC
An Islamic State militant carried out a public "execution" of his mother because she asked him to leave the group, activists say.
Ali Saqr, 21, killed his mother, Lena al-Qasem, 45, outside the post office in Raqqa, Syria, eyewitnesses said.
Raqqa has served as IS' de facto capital since the group captured the city in August 2013.
IS does not tolerate any dissent and imposes brutal punishments, often carried out in public.
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35260475
Note: The alleged crime was "apostasy".
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)WTF was her crime? Wanting him to leave a death cult? isis needs to be exterminated like roaches. These are not people who can be reasoned with and deserve no place in civilized society.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Absolutely insane.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)But think about if he ever snaps out of it and realizes what he's done. That would be a hell of a punishment in itself.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)No animal would do such a thing.
Religion truly has the capacity to warp the mind.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)...before we rush to judgement about this.
Coventina
(27,114 posts)Well played!!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)That poster is working my last nerve with his head in the sand bullshit.
trillion
(1,859 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I admit, it took me a bit. The word "socialist" was pretty scary. To a degree, it still is, with it's association with authoritarian economics policies of countries like Cuba and Venezuela.
But as I learned more about who he is, and what he stands for, I became more impressed with him. I will vote for Sec Clinton if she is nominated, but I really think Sen Sanders is the most compassionate and intelligent person in the race.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)Animals care for their families. I've never heard of an animal likely to kill their mother.
Coventina
(27,114 posts)Please save me from your followers!!
ancianita
(36,041 posts)Fear reigns by design, with the intent to have all residents submit to theocratic caliphate authority, the claim being that only then will there be peace.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)"submission"
ancianita
(36,041 posts)sharia, controlling the female half of the population or the reward of lots of virgins.
Then, when Islam reigns, its meaning of "peace" will be established. That's, of course, the "peace" of male spiritual -- and every other kind of -- rule.
Your close to getting a post censored! Col Jessep isn't here to help you
ancianita
(36,041 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)there. They really don't stand a chance with these vermin in control of their lives.
demosincebirth
(12,536 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)Yupster
(14,308 posts)wouldn't we?
trillion
(1,859 posts)foolish.
trillion
(1,859 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)We'll wait for your response LOL
EX500rider
(10,842 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy#Islam
Oneironaut
(5,493 posts)It doesn't matter if members do good things, or claim that people who do things like this "aren't real Muslims." Islam, and every other organized religion out there cannot be reasoned with. They all want to force you into their way of life, and will do anything to accomplish their goals.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)For what that is worth.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)If your brother, the son of your mother, or your son or your daughter or the wife you embrace[a] or your friend who is as your own soul entices you secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which neither you nor your fathers have known, 7 some of the gods of the peoples who are around you, whether near you or far off from you, from the one end of the earth to the other, 8 you shall not yield to him or listen to him, nor shall your eye pity him, nor shall you spare him, nor shall you conceal him. 9 But you shall kill him. Your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. 10 You shall stone him to death with stones, because he sought to draw you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. 11 And all Israel shall hear and fear and never again do any such wickedness as this among you.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+13%3A6-11&version=ESV
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Islam needs to go though a similar reformation.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Thankfully they won't get it
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Fundamentalist Christians don't support killing apostates. Shunning or excommunicating them is about as far as they go.
Whereas killing apostates is a pretty mainstream view in Islam.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)2 Chronicles 15.12-13 says:
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Can you point me to some fundamentalist Christian leaders who are calling for apostates to be put to death?
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Also this person isn't a fundamentalist Christian leader.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Its a free country, he said. If these people need to practice their holy rites of atheism, they can do so, as long as they are in clearly-marked encampments far away from the rest of us.
While theyre in their Heathen Zones, theyre free to dance naked around the fire, brand the mark of the Devil on their flesh or whatever else they want to do, he added. Of course, if they step one foot outside the electrified fence we shoot them between the eyes. Two or three times, just to be sure.[-/b]
oberliner
(58,724 posts)And I certainly don't mean to suggest that fundamentalist Christians don't have their own insane rules.
I am just saying that strict punishment for apostasy seems to be a particularly important element of Islam in a way that it isn't for other religions currently.
In the way that, say, murdering abortion doctors, is something that seems to feature prominently among fundamentalist Christians but not Muslims.
ancianita
(36,041 posts)"The Christian Republic of X." Apostasy in Islam isn't just loosey-goosey random treatment. It's up to the ummah how to treat apostates, and short of the death penalty that treatment's still not good.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)During the ethnic cleansing operations in the Balkans, the Serbs were marking villages for destruction based on the religious beliefs of the townspeople.
Let's put it another way: IF IT WAS LEGAL for American Christians to kill American non-Christians, would killing happen? And the answer is yes, it would.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)And I know that there are Christians who would like to see non-Christians killed in the US.
However, I am talking specifically about apostasy which seems to be a much bigger issue in Islam than in other religions.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Confessional State(Its not a theocracy, theyswear), they would like to at least imprison apostates. I know, I asked because I am such an apostate. According to Catholic rules, once baptized, you are always a Catholic.
What's interesting is the way they hedge here, and this is due to secular influence for sure, where they don't want to go into detail because it makes them look bad even though they believe they are right.
Not saying its mainstream, and Islam needs a huge injection of secular inoculation in order to coexist with the western world peaceably in the future.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I am genuinely curious if this has occurred or is occurring.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)that's part of the problem with Islam, the existence of Islamic states.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Presumably they would have they authority to do so, wouldn't they?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)though they did change the rules so that I can't, for example, take myself off the baptismal roles and am still counted as a Catholic, according to Church records.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Very interesting - thanks for the info.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Meaning if you left you were cut off from your friends and family. So humane. If it wasn't against the law, you can bet your ass they'd murder apostates.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)We need to be more tolerant of religious differences by decriminalizing apostate execution?
I am not sure of the point you are trying to make.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)there is no difference between words written in a book centuries ago by who the fuck knows who and LAWS ON THE BOOKS TODAY? Stop embarrassing yourself.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Anyone who takes it literally tries to impose it's morality and laws upon us whenever they can. Why do you think gay marriage has been such a hard sell?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Let them worship whatever sky fairy they want. We're talking about laws - ON THE BOOKS TODAY - that call for punishment, including execution - for leaving Islam. When a Christian or Jewish country has those laws on the books, then you'll have an argument. Until then, you're just trying to excuse this behavior by deflecting. Just stop it.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to pretend this is happening in other countries that are not under sharia law? Why the deflection?
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)It should not come as a shock that people would take the word of God literally and enforce it as taught in the Abrahamic faiths. This isn't something that is unique to Islam.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)You're talking about a holy book that some people read and so fucking what. I'm talking about LAWS ON THE BOOKS TODAY. I'm shouting because you continue to ignore the difference and I'm sick of it. There are no Christian or Jewish countries that have laws against leaving a religion. NONE. Only Islamic countries. An uncomfortable truth for you but the truth nonetheless. So yes, it IS unique to Islam as NO OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE THOSE LAWS ON THE BOOKS. Is that clear enough for you?
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)All the secular Arab nationalist states tended to align themselves with the Soviet Union. The US supported the Saudi's and their extremist form of Islam and their "freedom fighters" and others like them to check soviet influence in the region.
It's for the same reason we supported dictators in South America, but I doubt you look to South America and it's history and think "Golly, those Catholics just love their strongman dictators!"
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)And what does that have to do with my point? This discussion was about which countries have laws against blasphemy and the other poster was trying to argue that merely HAVING a holy book was the exact same as having laws on the books of governments. It isn't.
ancianita
(36,041 posts)meaningless in Christianity because the Old and New Testaments have at least ten or more modern translations by which people can differ -- which were taken from the Latin, which was taken from the Greek which was taken from the Aramaic, etc. You can get the Bible in your language, which might be a translation of the King James, or New International, etc.
In Islam, translation was forbidden by The Prophet. Only one/two officially authorized translations exist in the West today. If you're Muslim, you study the Qu'ran in Arabaic, period. Period. That language was the literal word of Allah, and no one may tamper with the unchangeable word of Allah. That is how it must be received, according to Islam and The Prophet. Thus, madrassas.
Literal word of Allah is waaay more consistent across continents than is the literal word of God.
Therein, according to reps from the Center for Islamic Studies, University of Chicago, lies the major difference about the bases of fundamentalism across these faiths.
christx30
(6,241 posts)a BLT or a shrimp cocktail, no one gives a crap. You go to Saudi Arabia and have a whiskey and you could get killed from lashes. That's the difference.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)In a similar way other authoritarian states have operated throughout history.
christx30
(6,241 posts)own entire countries and pass laws or have religious police that enforce provisions of the faith, or make shit up that needs to be banned.
Even if you're on a plane heading out of Iran, you can't have a drink until you cross out of Iranian airspace. Pretty crazy.
http://listverse.com/2012/11/12/top-10-everyday-things-banned-in-saudi-arabia/
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/top-10-everyday-things-banned-in-iran-2661566.html
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)It's just important to remember the rise of the current political Islam was born out of the cold war, where our country actively colluded with extremists like Saudi Arabia to fight or subvert any Islamic Arab or Persian government that wanted to secularize, because they more or less sided with the USSR, or were hostile to Israel, or wanted to nationalize their natural resources (oil).
Just look at photos from Afghanistan in the 1970's. The women there didn't look any different from those in the west. Then we started supporting the "freedom fighters" (along with our allies in the gulf states). And what happened after we "won" that proxy war?
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)but there is a passage in Deuteronomy calling for the death penalty by stoning for apostates; and while I don't think Christian theocrats have tended to differentiate between apostates and other heretics, the death penalty for heresy was common in Christian states in the past.
The difference is that some Muslim countries are still theocracies, while Christian countries have thankfully moved on from this, whatever some groups might wish.
ISIS is of course not a state, but considers itself as one.
Coventina
(27,114 posts)Zoroastrianism, for one, Shinto for another.
Wicca welcomes converts, but does not proselytize either, although one could argue it isn't an organized religion.
I would say that proselytizing religions are much more susceptible to abuse than non-proselytizing religions.
I wouldn't go so far to say that any are free of abuses, however.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)It's against the religion. Converts must come and ask (3 times if memory serves).
JudyM
(29,233 posts)I know several people who've converted to Judaism and it's difficult... They really had to be serious about it.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to part of the tribe. That's as it should be (imo).
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)E.g. Fascism; Stalinism; the current system in North Korea; etc.
But religion can make it even more possible to treat your leaders as gods, or representatives of gods, in whose name you can commit all sorts of atrocities.
Even non-proselytizing religions can be corrupted in this way. E.g. you mention Shintoism, which was certainly misused in the service of the state apparatus in Imperial Japan.
Coventina
(27,114 posts)It just happens to be my personal opinion that some are more abusive than others.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)But that was also a time when Japanese were taught to believe that the Emperor was a deity. Those days are long gone. Shintoism today is mostly a religion for trying to improve individual lives. Go to a Shinto shrine, put 10 yen in the collection box in front of the shrine, ring a bell, and follow a ritual for praying for good things in your life. After that, you might be able to go to the sales window and buy a lucky charm for ridding yourself of bad luck, or finding a good mate, or passing an entrance exam, or for traveling safely.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)ck4829
(35,069 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)define extremists. I learned a very powerful lesson recently on a trip to Israel. We were visiting a childhood friend of my brother in law who became very religious after law school, married and moved to Israel where he had 9 children while still practicing law. He and his wife were VERY religious but completely non-judgemental and not assholes about religion at all. We had a great dinner and after dinner conversation - took on many controversial topics (gay marriage for instance where the lawyer friend admitted it was unconstitutional to ban it under US law). I learned there are those who are quite seriously religious but that didn't automatically make them judgmental assholes. I went into that evening not believing I would see that.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No more and no less than there are some 'good' political extremists.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)JudyM
(29,233 posts)Without further explanation. So what you mean, I take it from your comment here, is that the ones who just keep to themselves without ranting or taking action are not flirting with evil? I agree with that. But when I think "extremist" I assume some kind of activism.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)Janist, you're a - okay with me.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Elmergantry
(884 posts)is willing to literally "force" one into their belief system.
And it aint Christianity
kentauros
(29,414 posts)All that ancient cultural baggage they bring with them is what corrupts religion; and politics. And the powerful use both as tools to control us, especially so that we don't question beyond the tool and what it's doing to us.
As the old adage goes, "Power corrupts..."
jonno99
(2,620 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)All religions are a terrible nuisance on societies.
Christian religion would love to put this in to practice in our country. Thank you U.S Constitution.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I think donnie is a complete asshole but we do have a constitution to deal with here. Stop with the trashing the west as if they were the same as these animals. We have enough problems without lying about what's actually going on and nobody is going to jail or being shot for leaving any religion. Just fucking stop.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)the one I was responding to. Try again.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)JudyM
(29,233 posts)further radicalization. Situational ethics can be extraordinarily powerful ... Our frame gets so narrowly focused we don't see our actions as unethical. Like the old Milgram experiments.
I'm not holding my breath.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I'm opposed to the death penalty, but anyone who would kill ANYBODY, much less their own mother, to serve an exclusionary apocalyptical religion is horrible and needs to never feel another moment of freedom or comfort.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)It's a power grab, or disaffected youth, or a backlash against the west or their patsies. Anything but religion.
(looks in dictionary) Oh that's what apostasy means. Fuck. Sorry.
ProfessorGAC
(65,010 posts)These guys are gangsters wrapping themselves in their religion. Now, i see some cultural issues that result in even slightest modicum of acceptance by the populations in which they operate. Those religious tenets have them accepting this gangsterism because it pretends to adhere to their personally held beliefs.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)That's even more damning, surely?
Those religious tenets have them accepting this gangsterism because it pretends to adhere to their personally held beliefs.
ProfessorGAC
(65,010 posts)You're failure to recognize the reality of 2016 is on you
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)You're all over the place here. First you seem to reject the idea this is religiously motivated, then you say ISIS is pretending to be religiously motivated but really faking it to ape the real religious motivation of the people in the area, and say I're wrong even though my're only claim is that executions for religious crime have religious motivations. Which is it?
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)...
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)I think he will be very careful about his life from here on out.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)at one time Christianity was the sickest of the lot. Today Islam is the sickest, most perverted of all of them. The fact that such an extreme violent gang of ISIS grew so fast and is so effective could have only happened because they have a large portion of the Muslim world that moved the goalposts so close to that medival edge. That is religious conditioning. If 50% of them still believe that if another human has the audacity to decide for him or herself what God looks like, where he comes from, or if he even exists....they should be executed immediately That is one nasty virus. And the Islamic world is not doing enough to moderate its interpretation of the Koran.
The one saving grace of the Christian religion may be the message of Jesus. And the message of loving your enemies and doing good to those that harm you etc...The parts that Ghandi admired. The new testament has worked as a buffer against too aggressive of behaviour by using old testament verses. Although one could make arguments about W. Bush's God led invasion of Iraq, that even Christianity still can be abused and steered for political purposes.
That's why all religion is a sickness to some degree. Its a mind control device that gives the user the incomparable gift of everlasting love, and life, and righteous superiority....if only one lives by strict moral rules and gives themselves over to any suggestion that their local chosen paster, priest, or other clergyperson and church leaders perpetrate on them by slow methodical sermonizing together with immersion in the fellowship of the cult, and feelings of being part of a community. This is not bad in its own right, but as an arm of the cult of religion it serves the greater purpose. That of spreading the virus further.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)That poor woman.
romanic
(2,841 posts)That's all that comes to mind with this story.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)It is time for the world to stand up to muslim extremists and start saying NO.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Of course he gave it zero thought and pulled the trigger. What a good little Nazi.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Janism, for example.