Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 08:15 PM Jan 2016

South Carolina Lawmaker Wants to Register Journalists With the Government

Source: Time

Republican State Rep. Mike Pitts said he's “not a press hater”

Melissa Chan @melissalchan 4:59 PM ET

A South Carolina lawmaker on Tuesday introduced a bill that would require journalists in the state to be listed in a registry and vetted before they are hired by a media outlet.

Republican State Rep. Mike Pitts said the legislation would create a panel of experts to determine if a person qualifies as a journalist, similar to the process doctors and lawyers go through, The Post and Courier reports.

The bill, titled “South Carolina Responsible Journalism Registry Law,” would also keep a “responsible journalism registry” and outline requirements for reporters to reach before they can work in the media. Journalists would also face “minor fines” if they violate the law.

Pitts, who last year made headlines for his efforts to keep the Confederate flag flying at the South Carolina State House, told The Post and Courier he is “not a press hater” and said the bill is needed to make sure journalists adhere to a code of ethics. He added that the bill is at least partially in response to the press “demonizing guns and gun ownership.”

Read more: http://time.com/4185928/journalist-registry-south-carolina-pitts/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South Carolina Lawmaker Wants to Register Journalists With the Government (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2016 OP
Just like the repubs vetted that male prostitute Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #1
Oh he was thoroughly vetted. Jerry442 Jan 2016 #9
Got fascism? KamaAina Jan 2016 #2
When do we start vetting State Reps, Mr Pitts? n/t malthaussen Jan 2016 #3
It never... deathrind Jan 2016 #4
Herr Pitts! FUCK YOU in german. Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #5
South Carolina tabasco Jan 2016 #6
FAUX News First Fucker jpak Jan 2016 #7
Apparently the bill is a political statement about the Second Amendment Xithras Jan 2016 #8
Understandable.... Everyone knows the pen is more dangerous than the gun groundloop Jan 2016 #18
Nothing would Surprise me from South Carolina! KoKo Jan 2016 #10
Nevermind. (Post was addressed upthread!) AleksS Jan 2016 #11
So does that mean Fox so called news will be banned from SC? elmac Jan 2016 #12
IT CAN HAPPEN HERE appalachiablue Jan 2016 #13
Mike Pitts is a total fuckup. blackspade Jan 2016 #14
Fascist Matthew28 Jan 2016 #15
Yeah, and while we're at it lordsummerisle Jan 2016 #16
Totalitarian nwduke Jan 2016 #17
The fellow will go far once Trump becomes president. Kablooie Jan 2016 #19
I dunno... BobTheSubgenius Jan 2016 #20

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
4. It never...
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 08:26 PM
Jan 2016

Ceases to amaze me at how flexible republicans are on "certain" constitutional amendment and not on others.

Oddly enough there is a direct correlation to their like or dislike of certain amendment and their flexibility. Take for instance the 2nd amendment, suggest that it may need to be revamped in order to be more in line with today's technology and they are adamantly against it. Yet most of them are all for revamping the 14th amendment to remove birth right citizenship. Now apparently this republican has an issue with the first amendment...

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
6. South Carolina
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 08:34 PM
Jan 2016

"We think fascism is cool!"

One of these jerk wads who claims he "loves the Constitution," no doubt.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. Apparently the bill is a political statement about the Second Amendment
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jan 2016

After doing a bit more reading, it looks like the guy doesn't really want to register journalists. He apparently took some of the various gun control concepts currently being discussed and replaced "gun" with "journalist." His goal was to demonstrate the effect of the proposed gun regulations when they're applied to another consitutionally protected subject. It's a "If these regulations are good for one amendment, why not another" argument.

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
18. Understandable.... Everyone knows the pen is more dangerous than the gun
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jan 2016

sword, gun, who's counting?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
10. Nothing would Surprise me from South Carolina!
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 09:09 PM
Jan 2016

I grew up there and Left it. I wanted to find a more Inclusive Environment than existed there.

Always remember that Joe Biden loves Big Bucks and Repub Owner of Kiawah Island Resort and Democrats have been big visitors to Kiawah Island for Conferences, etc., through the years.

South Carolina seems to hold (since the aftermath of the Confederacy) a special place in Both Party's Hearts!

Don't believe me? Listen to the MSM Coverage about the POWER of the SC VOTE in the Coming Election.

TRUST but VERIFY!

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
12. So does that mean Fox so called news will be banned from SC?
Tue Jan 19, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jan 2016

or are they exempt under Christian jihadist states rules.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»South Carolina Lawmaker W...