Clinton hits Sanders over Planned Parenthood comments
Source: CNN
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders traded jabs Tuesday over the decision by progressive groups like Planned Parenthood and the Human Rights Campaign to endorse Clinton.
In an interview on MSNBC on Tuesday night, Sanders responded to a question about Clinton's endorsements with a broad criticism of the "establishment," explaining, "What we are doing in this campaign -- and it just blows my mind every day, because I see it clearly, we're taking on not only Wall Street and the economic establishment, we're taking on the political establishment."
"And so I have friends and supporters in the Human Rights Fund, in Planned Parenthood," Sanders continued. "But you know what, Hillary Clinton has been around there for a very, very long time and some of these groups are, in fact, part of the establishment."
...snip...
"Really Senator Sanders?" Clinton tweeted, citing the Twitter handles for Planned Parenthood and the Human Rights Campaign. "How can you say that groups like @PPact and @HRC are part of the 'establishment' you're taking on? --H."
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/20/politics/clinton-sanders-establishment-endorsements/
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Bernie Sanders should have said, "Planned Parenthood is a wonderful organization. I have a 100% rating from them. I wish they had endorsed me, but I look forward to working with them regardless."
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)SunSeeker
(51,771 posts)When I heard him say that on Rachel's show I was disgusted. It was wrong, period.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and is reaping the consequences.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)No hope! No change!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)she already bought the PP endorsements by hiring the leader's daughter. She should move onward and tell us why she wants to be president and what she can do for us. But since she has nothing but know your place, she is attacking. That will be FAIL.
She has no clue and her team is useless.
SunSeeker
(51,771 posts)He knows damn well PP is not "the establishment." But he only seems to have one argument for things that pissed him off, so he makes it, regardless of who he's talking about.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that Hillary erodes her own credibility by taking umbrage to that.
But, Bernie bragging that he's 'taking on' a Planned Parenthood is pretty close to the Nader "gonadal politics" threshold.
PWPippin
(213 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:34 PM - Edit history (1)
As soon as PP gave an endorsement, something they have rarely done in primaries in the past, they became political and could be seen as "part of the establishment". They should have stayed neutral, at least until later in the primaries, for the good of the organization, their need for donations and the political climate.
brooklynite
(94,839 posts)Planned Parenthood, the service provider, is a legally separate entity and is prohibited by law from engaging in political activity.
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Planned Parenthood is under attack and if the GOP wins the Presidency, as an organization, they're done. They must wade in during the primaries because they're very viability depends on who wins the 2016 race. Obviously, they feel HRC will be a better champion for them as President than Bernie, even though he has an 100% rating from them.
riversedge
(70,374 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)as a general matter of principle?
Thenewire
(130 posts)Sanders has been pandering to Trump's racist followers for a while now. Those people don't deserve to have their voices heard, they are as much trash as their ideas.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)it is reasonable to assume that the leadership of the organizations endorsing her have been promised something in return. That is how he can say that the leadership of those organizations are part of the political establishment.
How is that not obvious?
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)the more I don't like him. It seems more clear by the day that he is a typical politician. I don't have a problem with typical politicians. I have a problem with politicians who claim not to be typical politicians.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Given the fact that you just don't seem to like anyone who isn't Hillary, why should anyone care what you think?
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)And guess what? I don't care!
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I don't like to take one comment out of context. It does seem like you are just someone who throws out negative comments and have nothing positive to say. You will never earn anyone's respect like that. Once you get out of junior high, you may want to do that. It could be a good idea to practice now.
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #52)
Post removed
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)You started this with your rude response to my post.
Good luck.
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)Next on the agenda, block you!
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)That way I won't have you posting rude responses to me anymore.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)I always check into posters I don't know.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1319761
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The comment speaks for itself.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:56 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Thought of hiding it, but after a quick search Motown_Johnny's comment seems pretty accurate based on more recent posting. And ChiTownDenny did call him a liar in the next post. Chill. It was borderline for me, but ChiTownDenny did a pretty poor job of making his case.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Ban the Alerter.
Gothmog
(145,750 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,812 posts)Have you had pro-lifers call your boss to fire you because your office was across the street from a clinic and you obviously supported the clinic? When right to life Kansas came to town did you form a human shield for the Carhart Clinic? I posted about that 4-5 years ago.
Marta and I have. Bernie's has a 100% rating from PP. Marta and I are standing behind Bernie and PP-HRC.
OS
riversedge
(70,374 posts)Rights Campaign. It blows my mind.
Omaha Steve
(99,812 posts)You went right over my have you been an escort EVER to saying being rated 100% is degrading.
OS
riversedge
(70,374 posts)response, that is fine.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Classy.
elias49
(4,259 posts)go with the status quo candidate.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Clinton attacks Bernie! That happens a dozen times a day.
riversedge
(70,374 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Just mundane daily verbiage.
Hardly "Stop the presses ~ BREAKING NEWS!"
riversedge
(70,374 posts)the Human rights campaign.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)are part of the political establishment is an attack? IMO it's rather expected after 100 years
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)as part of the establishment he's "taking on" he's adopting an explicitly hostile stance towards that group.
Okay, what's his plan for attacking Planned Parenthood. What does he hope to accomplish by confronting them?
This makes his campaign look like a bunch of anger looking around for a target to punch.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)CNN had some talk this morning that Hillary will "tip toe" out of New Hampshire,
conceding it to Bernie.
Then, when he wins there in a landslide, they'll say:
"Well, we didn't compete there."
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)sure seemed desperate
emulatorloo
(44,249 posts)Sounded to me like more Jeff Walker/Tad Devine strategery.
I hope to hell Sanders walks it back, the sooner the better.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)In 2008, Clinton chose to trust her campaign to Mark Penn. That by itself was enough to justify choosing someone else.
This was a self-inflicted wound. Did they really think they'd get more votes by portraying Planned Parenthood as an obstacle to reform?
emulatorloo
(44,249 posts)So I'm sure that they'll have some success with it. But at what cost?
riversedge
(70,374 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)The leaders of these groups are part of the political establishment.
The truth hurts.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)No.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He said PP is part of the establishment he's confronting and challenging.
As they face defunding and persecution by governors and Congress. That's some serious establishment mojo.
At least they weren't quite as nasty with PP as they were with HRC.
navarth
(5,927 posts)I have a question. Why do you use the Bernie icon?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)But Sanders has not impressed me of late, I will admit that. He's still my preference and the person I'll be voting for. But I'm not one of the "Bernie is the messiah" types that are so common here.
navarth
(5,927 posts)coulda fooled me from this thread.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)you're probably not used to seeing it in primary discussions
navarth
(5,927 posts)that would be disappointing. I have no problem with independent thought; in fact I celebrate it.
What I'm seeing from you in this thread implies more than just independent thought, or so it seems to me. You're certainly being critical. I was just wondering if it's meant to be constructive.
IMO Bernie was referring to the governing bodies of these organizations, and speaking to the fact that the rank-and-file was not involved in the decisions. In other words: establishment. Perhaps he was impolitic; but he was right. Wasn't he?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to see people claim it isn't.
http://www.hrc.org/hrc-story/corporate-partners
As far as PP is concerned, it's under siege. From Congress, from governors, from the media, from domestic terrorists.
It's a service organization, and one whose mission and existence are perpetually threatened by the political establishment.
It was major league sour grapes to talk about PP as if it's the evil establishment that needs to be overthrown.
Bernie's not entitled to everyone's support.
navarth
(5,927 posts)I only disagree with the characterization that says Bernie was talking about PP when he was clearly talking about their leadership and the lack of input from the rank and file.
It was, as I already said, impolitic for him to put it that way. Meh, it's not enough to make me not vote for him. After all, we're not supporting him because he's well-rehearsed. But your points are well taken.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)not terribly compelling.
navarth
(5,927 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)but I no longer think he's the perfect candidate.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)
The leadership of both organizations are definitely part of the Democratic political establishment.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)until he failed to get their endorsement
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:13 PM - Edit history (1)
When they erroneously (IMO) chose to take sides in the primary.
That's politics. When you throw some iron in the fire you might get hit by a spark or two.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)women . . .
blackspade
(10,056 posts)His point was clear even if you didn't get it.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)24 years? Mr Outsider
blackspade
(10,056 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)was saying the establishment of those groups who endorsed HRC are the ones that endorsed her not the members. Same with the unions that endorsed her. The members are not being asked or involved.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)why in the reply title sometimes does my typing become dim?
navarth
(5,927 posts)Have no idea why, I just figured it was inadvertent software-related stuff. I dunno, never gave it much thought.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)sometimes it happens other times it does not...
joshcryer
(62,279 posts)Like when you do bold or italics, they forget the final closing bit.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and Hillary's positions on women's rights. This is not an issue that he can beat Hillary on or even compete with her on, so he should have just taken the high road and said that while he admired Planned Parenthood and wished that they could have endorsed him, he understood why they endorsed Hillary. Whoever told him that it was a good idea to retaliate for the endorsement by attacking Planned Parenthood as "part of the establishment" should be fired from his campaign.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)But here we have the reality of who he is.
I doubt that the women who have been helped by PP will take kindly to those comments.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)establishment mismanagement and needed more help to free up the their rights. When both groups are being so marginalized they are not well established and not strong enough to push away the irrational political power coming from the RW.
That's what I thought.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)we have a sub-establishment within the Democratic Party; that is why endorsements from various interest groups matter. The real question here is, is Hillary the candidate of the Party Establishment (cough, debate schedule, cough) and if so, does that matter?
Beacool
(30,253 posts)'Planned Parenthood and the Human Rights Campaign both responded on twitter Wednesday morning to Sanders' criticism.
"We respect @SenSanders. Disappointed to be called 'establishment' as we fight like hell to protect women's health," Planned Parenthood wrote.'
Good for them.
CTyankee
(63,914 posts)point but I think it was awkward and misplaced (I am a Bernie supporter BTW).
PP has fought for women's reproductive rights for 100 years. Yes, they have major inroads of support in the Dem Party, which started at the same time the GOP went insane over reproductive rights of women.
PP wanted support from republicans as well as democrats but the door was slammed in their face by the new GOP.
Let's face it: both Dem and repub women go to PP for services. One in five women in this country seek PP's care at some point in their lives. And repubs want that care shut down and cut off. They might secretly believe that the ACA kinda took care of the reproductive care side of things so defunding PP wouldn't be "so bad." I know, how bad is that...
My guess is that Bernie is a huge supporter of PP but wanted it to not endorse HRC. I think he felt let down. However, I am convinced that his support for women's rights remains as strong as ever.
Vinca
(50,321 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)misogynist meme that seem to be the crux HRC's campaign is not going to work out like camp weathervane hopes.
There are many women that have no respect for her whatsoever.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Things like this just illustrate her desperation.
riversedge
(70,374 posts)lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)do not speak for me. IMO when he used the term he was referring to the "established" leadership,,, establishment class.