Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:24 PM Mar 2016

Sanders confirms he won't attend AIPAC

Source: Politico

Bernie Sanders will be the only presidential candidate not speaking before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, he confirmed on Friday.

The Vermont senator’s campaign announced he had sent a letter to the pro-Israel lobbying group explaining why he will not be able to attend next week's AIPAC's policy conference — a major annual gathering point for the Jewish state's American supporters.

“I would very much have enjoyed speaking at the AIPAC conference. Obviously issues impacting Israel and the Middle East are of the utmost importance to me, to our country and to the world,” Sanders, who is Jewish, wrote to AIPAC President Robert Cohen. “Unfortunately, I am going to be traveling throughout the West and the campaign schedule that we have prevents me from attending.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/bernie-sanders-not-attend-aipac-israel-220973

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders confirms he won't attend AIPAC (Original Post) oberliner Mar 2016 OP
A big 'thank you' to Bernie!!! eom Purveyor Mar 2016 #1
Sí. ¡Que cojones! n/t Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #29
I wish he could have gone, but I'd rather his efforts remain on the campaign trail! Behind the Aegis Mar 2016 #2
K&R jwirr Mar 2016 #3
KnR Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #4
He always flounders on foreign policy questions during debates. riversedge Mar 2016 #5
What does that have to do... DeadLetterOffice Mar 2016 #8
It has to do with foreign policy-which Sanders avoids or distracts from. riversedge Mar 2016 #19
It probably has more to do with Israel's military style government... motionspotlight Mar 2016 #20
He said it was due his campaign schedule ... LannyDeVaney Mar 2016 #21
Your right....geeesh! Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #28
He was being polite OwlinAZ Mar 2016 #32
Obama has spoken at AIPAC and Biden is currently speaking there oberliner Mar 2016 #63
I think the administration thought they needed to be represented, and of the three people they could karynnj Mar 2016 #70
If you want that opinion sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #37
The guy who voted against a stupid war flounders ha PatrynXX Mar 2016 #41
+1 Historic NY Mar 2016 #51
Realist Bernie Sanders knows when a write up is coming. Will Hillary Clinton follow Obama DhhD Mar 2016 #57
Sanders must believe in the Two State Solution made at the end of WWII but broken by Israel DhhD Mar 2016 #55
AIPAC has nothing to do with foreign policy RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #59
don't know don't care PatrynXX Mar 2016 #40
That's funny, considering it comes from Nickel79 Mar 2016 #9
Booyah! KPN Mar 2016 #35
He should kowtow to a right wing organization? Human101948 Mar 2016 #11
Or maybe Mark 750 Mar 2016 #14
By not going he is making a statement. jillan Mar 2016 #44
it would be tough to tear apart the lies at the heart of the Washington consensus yurbud Mar 2016 #58
?? This is the group that plans mass walkouts on Trump's speech.... Hekate Mar 2016 #6
THANK YOU BERNIE!!! n/t DeadLetterOffice Mar 2016 #7
Thank you Bernie! zentrum Mar 2016 #10
Good for Bernie BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #12
Like shooting fish in a barrel, the genocide of Gaza in 2014 WillYourVoteBCounted Mar 2016 #13
Horrible. clg311 Mar 2016 #22
Thank you for this post dreamnightwind Mar 2016 #33
The elephant in the room awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #42
So let's see... EX500rider Mar 2016 #48
"Only killed 1500" NickB79 Mar 2016 #54
Sorry, a basement won't save you from modern munitions... EX500rider Mar 2016 #56
Also the only candidate who actually lived on a kibbutz. How ironic! n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #15
Any one watch the national press at AIPAC today floppyboo Mar 2016 #16
AIPAC is a foreign lobby group WillYourVoteBCounted Mar 2016 #23
Exactly farleftlib Mar 2016 #34
That's a lie oberliner Mar 2016 #68
So I guess that means he's a self hating Jew who wants to march his fellow Jews into the ovens.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #17
He gets to have it both ways with this decision. Plausible deniability but full support of Israel Jitter65 Mar 2016 #18
Plausible in that sense, perhaps. But AIPAC would doubtless like to assert Ghost Dog Mar 2016 #30
As opposed to her kissing their butts jillan Mar 2016 #45
Good to see SOMEBODY giving them the brush-off! Uhmercan Irishman Mar 2016 #24
Ya see, Bernie is a smart politician! flamingdem Mar 2016 #25
Oh well, isn't that a shame Scootaloo Mar 2016 #26
I signed the petition the other day for him to NOT attend. Duckfan Mar 2016 #27
Good on Bernie! burrowowl Mar 2016 #31
Good call Bernie! KPN Mar 2016 #36
Damn old geezer sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #38
Campaigning > international affairs. Amimnoch Mar 2016 #39
Campaigning > AIPAC shawn703 Mar 2016 #43
Lol at the Hill supporters not understanding that Aipac jillan Mar 2016 #46
LOL harder at the ones that were anti-Israeli policy Kalidurga Mar 2016 #52
Evidently you haven't looked at Sanders voting record BainsBane Mar 2016 #60
My Respect for Bernie just went Up Several Notches Wolf Frankula Mar 2016 #47
"AIPAC are foreign agents and should be made to register as such" oberliner Mar 2016 #62
He Can Hide Now LeFleur1 Mar 2016 #67
Good. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #49
Sanders is Jewish. Surprised AIPAC didn't offer him the same courtesy they did Republicans. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #50
"They don't believe in a two state solution" oberliner Mar 2016 #61
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #53
Bravo Bernie, Bravo. harun Mar 2016 #64
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #65
Thanks Bernie! tabasco Mar 2016 #66
From the livestream I watched for a while yesterday, he would have had a hostile audience karynnj Mar 2016 #69
You can watch Biden's full speech on YouTube oberliner Mar 2016 #71
Thanks - Did you like Biden's speech? nt karynnj Mar 2016 #72
I thought it was pretty good oberliner Mar 2016 #73

Behind the Aegis

(53,955 posts)
2. I wish he could have gone, but I'd rather his efforts remain on the campaign trail!
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:32 PM
Mar 2016

More people will appreciate seeing him at the rallies.

motionspotlight

(18 posts)
20. It probably has more to do with Israel's military style government...
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

....it seems like he has the same viewpoints as Obama, pro-Two state, won't stand for what the Israel government is doing. And that's coming from a Jew who spent time in Israel, no RW nut can spin it as Obama's a muslim, ehh.

 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
21. He said it was due his campaign schedule ...
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:51 PM
Mar 2016

are you saying he is lying?

Surely you aren't implying he won't stand for what the Israeli government is doing, but would rather make up a story about the demands on campaigning?

 

OwlinAZ

(410 posts)
32. He was being polite
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 07:33 AM
Mar 2016

WHat he said was not untrue.
As for AIPAC,only a few who are walking out. The remainder are not the righteous.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
63. Obama has spoken at AIPAC and Biden is currently speaking there
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:32 AM
Mar 2016

AIPAC explicitly supports and advocates for a two-state solution.

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
70. I think the administration thought they needed to be represented, and of the three people they could
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:45 PM
Mar 2016

- President Obama, VP Biden, or Secretary Kerry, Biden is likely the least controversial choice. Secretary Kerry negotiated the Iran nuclear deal with President Obama's blessing and commitment that the US do this. Biden was not really involved in that and although I assume he favored it behind the scenes, there is nothing public on that. President Obama is in Cuba - as is Kerry and Kerry is then heading to Moscow to speak with officials there on Syria and Ukraine. Good enough excuses not to be there.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
37. If you want that opinion
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:38 PM
Mar 2016

to be taken seriously you'll need to back it up with some of those darn facts.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
41. The guy who voted against a stupid war flounders ha
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

very funny joke. Get ready for World Word IV next year.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
57. Realist Bernie Sanders knows when a write up is coming. Will Hillary Clinton follow Obama
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 11:37 AM
Mar 2016

in controlling Netanyahu and Kissenger?
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4723986,00.html


http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-the-foreign-policy-realist-of-2016/


AIPAC to be held this week. Lets see what is said before Sanders issues a written foreign policy plan. Here is a list of confirmed speakers-mostly Republicans, two New Democrats.
http://www.policyconference.org/



Does anybody believe that Progressive Democrats would fit in even though Obama is showing his progressive side?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
59. AIPAC has nothing to do with foreign policy
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 08:21 AM
Mar 2016

It's just another lobbying group. Paying off legislators like all the others!

 

Nickel79

(81 posts)
9. That's funny, considering it comes from
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:13 PM
Mar 2016

a person who supports a candidate that has repeatedly failed on foreign policy issues. HRC was tested and failed, multiple times.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
11. He should kowtow to a right wing organization?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:27 PM
Mar 2016
AIPAC Is an Awe-inspiring Organization, but the Right-wing Tilt Is in Its DNA
Like a good defense lawyer, AIPAC highlights facts that promote its client while repressing evidence to the contrary. The Israeli right is expert at that.


read more: http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden/aipac-is-an-awe-inspiring-organization-but-the-right-wing-tilt-is-in-its-dna.premium-1.507791

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
58. it would be tough to tear apart the lies at the heart of the Washington consensus
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 11:56 AM
Mar 2016

in a couple of minutes.

What are government claims to do and what they are actually doing are light years apart.

I give Obama props for some restraint on Syria and Ukraine when the neocons and other foreign policy hawks seemed intent on starting World War III.

Before the next big war, someone has to unpack what we have really been doing in the world and connect it to the causes of every other war in human history to show how absurd the stated reasons for the wars were.

Hekate

(90,662 posts)
6. ?? This is the group that plans mass walkouts on Trump's speech....
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:07 PM
Mar 2016

Too bad Bernie can't be there due to the press of campaign business. It might have been entertaining to watch the clash of contrasts.

WillYourVoteBCounted

(14,622 posts)
13. Like shooting fish in a barrel, the genocide of Gaza in 2014
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

AIPAC supports genocide and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

In 25 days during July 2014, Israel "used more than 50,000 bombs in its war on the civilians of the Gaza Strip: 6,318 missiles have been fired by Air Force jets; 13,866 were fired by the navy; and 30,581 were fired by tanks and artillery stationed on the eastern border of the enclave."

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/13180-israel-has-used-50000-missiles-in-gaza-killing-almost-1500-palestinians





In 25 days during July 2014, Israel "used more than 50,000 bombs in its war on the civilians of the Gaza Strip: 6,318 missiles have been fired by Air Force jets; 13,866 were fired by the navy; and 30,581 were fired by tanks and artillery stationed on the eastern border of the enclave."

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/13180-israel-has-used-50000-








In a 25 day period in July 2014, ISRAEL KILLED 1400 Gazans, with 8,200 people wounded in the four-week operation. Up to 80% of the Palestinian casualties were civilians, according to local non-government organisations and the UN.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/31/gaza-faces-precipice-death-toll-tops-1400






 

clg311

(119 posts)
22. Horrible.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

Reading the 51 Day War by Max Blumenthal. It makes me angry that my tax dollars are supporting this barbarism.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
33. Thank you for this post
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 11:54 AM
Mar 2016

Sad that this, and more, is excused by som many of us here. AIPAC sucks, and I'm glad that Bernie won't speak to them, although I actually would have enjoyed it if he went in there and spoke to them the way he spoke to Liberty University, citing some common interests while not glossing over disagreements.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
42. The elephant in the room
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

That too many American politicians ignore while sucking up to this lobbying group for a few shekels.

EX500rider

(10,842 posts)
48. So let's see...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 12:44 AM
Mar 2016

.....according to your numbers they fired over 100,000 bombs/missiles/shells in a highly populated area and only killed 1,500 and you think they were trying to kill civilians? Seems more like they did all they could to limit casualties or the numbers would be 100,000+ dead.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
54. "Only killed 1500"
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 10:01 AM
Mar 2016

Oh, ONLY?? That's all? Well, golly fucking gee, how humane of them.

I'd speculate that one of the reasons the numbers weren't much higher is that the Palestinians, having lived through shit like this for the past few DECADES, knew to take shelter in any basement, bunker or hole they could find the moment they knew the mini-war was going hot again.

EX500rider

(10,842 posts)
56. Sorry, a basement won't save you from modern munitions...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

....and yes, that is a incredibly low number for military operations in a urban environment considering the amount of ordnance expended and only possible with the utter and utmost care taken to avoid civilian casualties and I doubt any other country including the US could do half as well to keep civilian deaths as low.

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
16. Any one watch the national press at AIPAC today
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:07 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:38 PM - Edit history (1)

live stream on TRNN - They said they'd have it up on youtube. worth checking out. I don't know how supporting all these tax free organizations that support some of these policies would be kosher with Bernie

WillYourVoteBCounted

(14,622 posts)
23. AIPAC is a foreign lobby group
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:41 PM
Mar 2016

it is all about getting congress to fund Israel to the tune of $3B a year for weapons etc,
while Israel takes more and more Palestinian land and kills more and more Palestinians.

Taking someone else's land, not just Palestinians but Jordanians, Syrians, is what Israel does.

It is racism, zionism, where only "one people" have human rights.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
34. Exactly
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 11:58 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie is not an Israel-right-or-wrong candidate. He supports a two-state solution. AIPAC has far too much influence on our politicians already.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
17. So I guess that means he's a self hating Jew who wants to march his fellow Jews into the ovens....
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

There can be no other explanation.





















Really? Was this needed?

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
18. He gets to have it both ways with this decision. Plausible deniability but full support of Israel
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:19 PM
Mar 2016

policies.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
30. Plausible in that sense, perhaps. But AIPAC would doubtless like to assert
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:12 AM
Mar 2016

that its interests should be the top priority of any US presidential candidate.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
25. Ya see, Bernie is a smart politician!
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:17 AM
Mar 2016

For reals, that would not be a place to be and he has a perfectly good reason not to attend

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
38. Damn old geezer
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

can't attend the AIPAC convention because he never learned how to kneel and kiss the money ring.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
39. Campaigning > international affairs.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:53 PM
Mar 2016

Probably the smart move anyway. Everybody knows foreign affairs ain't his thang.

Maybe he can see Canada from his house.

Besides.. as president that whole foreign affairs thing is overrated.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
46. Lol at the Hill supporters not understanding that Aipac
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:08 PM
Mar 2016

Stands in the way of peace in the Middle East

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
60. Evidently you haven't looked at Sanders voting record
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:04 AM
Mar 2016

or public statements on Israeli Palestinian issues.

Wolf Frankula

(3,600 posts)
47. My Respect for Bernie just went Up Several Notches
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:54 PM
Mar 2016

I hope to vote for him in the primary and General Election.

American pols at the AIPAC convention.
"May I please, please lick Binyamin Nuttyyahoo's asshole clean?"
"May I please, please eat Israel's shit?"
"We will happily starve our people to make Israel fat."

AIPAC are foreign agents and should be made to register as such. Israel is NOT our friend.

Wolf

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
62. "AIPAC are foreign agents and should be made to register as such"
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:31 AM
Mar 2016

Membership in AIPAC is restricted to US citizens.

LeFleur1

(1,197 posts)
67. He Can Hide Now
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:58 AM
Mar 2016

but what happens if he's elected President? He can't hide from world affairs then. Foreign policy is a very big part of the presidency today. Pretending nothing is happening outside our country would be dangerous to us all.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
50. Sanders is Jewish. Surprised AIPAC didn't offer him the same courtesy they did Republicans.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:39 AM
Mar 2016

I'm glad he's not going to be a group whose only priority is Zionism. They don't believe in a two state solution. It is primarily a hard liners lobbying organziation.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
61. "They don't believe in a two state solution"
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:28 AM
Mar 2016

AIPAC actually explicitly supports and advocates for a two-state solution.



From the AIPAC website:

Two states for two people.

AIPAC strongly supports a two-state solution and works tirelessly to bring peace to the region. A two-state solution – a Jewish state of Israel living in peace with a demilitarized Palestinian state – with an end to all claims is the clear path to resolving this generations-old conflict.

http://www.aipac.org/learn/issues/issue-display?issueid=%7B8DB2B03A-3F5F-4A92-BED7-3CFDE9C87609%7D

Response to oberliner (Original post)

Response to oberliner (Original post)

karynnj

(59,503 posts)
69. From the livestream I watched for a while yesterday, he would have had a hostile audience
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

I turned it on, thinking that Joe Biden would be speaking - he wasn't. A man, I did not recognize was and he spoke of intending to introduce legislation to keep Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. He was well received - even as he said that the multinational, historic Iran deal did not do that ... it would just delay it. That this mind set is STILL what works at AIPAC shows that they are completely at oods with all but a few militant Democrats, the Republicans, the Israelis and maybe some militant Sunni countries!

This does NOT represent where the American Jewish people are and it is as repugnant that candidates are pandering to them as it is that they pander to Sheldon Adleson. The sad thing is their extreme position med more mainstream Jewish organizations like some of the Jewish Federations who backed them on Iran. I was speaking to a leader of one at a synagogue event and it was interesting how we talked past each other rather than to each other - though I did understand his point. Jews not refusing to contribute are hurting the good work they actually do. I do not think he got my point that THIS was a reason they should not have used their outreach against Obama. His response was to ask if I trusted Netanyahu - and the conversation ended when I said no, but I do trust Kerry, Obama and the entire UN security council.

Looking back at the conversation, it started as he spoke of how many federations had lost donations. Given that many big donors are either Republican or not affected by politics, this suggests that there are many American Jews very angry that AIPAC and Netanyahu claim to speak for them.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
73. I thought it was pretty good
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016

It is unfortunate that Israel has been led by a PM like Netanyahu instead of someone more reasonable who might have been more amenable to the Obama administration's attempts to broker a long term peace deal.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders confirms he won't...