Sanders confirms he won't attend AIPAC
Source: Politico
Bernie Sanders will be the only presidential candidate not speaking before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, he confirmed on Friday.
The Vermont senators campaign announced he had sent a letter to the pro-Israel lobbying group explaining why he will not be able to attend next week's AIPAC's policy conference a major annual gathering point for the Jewish state's American supporters.
I would very much have enjoyed speaking at the AIPAC conference. Obviously issues impacting Israel and the Middle East are of the utmost importance to me, to our country and to the world, Sanders, who is Jewish, wrote to AIPAC President Robert Cohen. Unfortunately, I am going to be traveling throughout the West and the campaign schedule that we have prevents me from attending.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/bernie-sanders-not-attend-aipac-israel-220973
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,955 posts)More people will appreciate seeing him at the rallies.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)... with him going to AIPAC?
riversedge
(70,204 posts)motionspotlight
(18 posts)....it seems like he has the same viewpoints as Obama, pro-Two state, won't stand for what the Israel government is doing. And that's coming from a Jew who spent time in Israel, no RW nut can spin it as Obama's a muslim, ehh.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)are you saying he is lying?
Surely you aren't implying he won't stand for what the Israeli government is doing, but would rather make up a story about the demands on campaigning?
Pauldg47
(640 posts)OwlinAZ
(410 posts)WHat he said was not untrue.
As for AIPAC,only a few who are walking out. The remainder are not the righteous.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)AIPAC explicitly supports and advocates for a two-state solution.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)- President Obama, VP Biden, or Secretary Kerry, Biden is likely the least controversial choice. Secretary Kerry negotiated the Iran nuclear deal with President Obama's blessing and commitment that the US do this. Biden was not really involved in that and although I assume he favored it behind the scenes, there is nothing public on that. President Obama is in Cuba - as is Kerry and Kerry is then heading to Moscow to speak with officials there on Syria and Ukraine. Good enough excuses not to be there.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)to be taken seriously you'll need to back it up with some of those darn facts.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)very funny joke. Get ready for World Word IV next year.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)The foreign policy paper he promised last June still hasn't appeared.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)in controlling Netanyahu and Kissenger?
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4723986,00.html
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-the-foreign-policy-realist-of-2016/
AIPAC to be held this week. Lets see what is said before Sanders issues a written foreign policy plan. Here is a list of confirmed speakers-mostly Republicans, two New Democrats.
http://www.policyconference.org/
Does anybody believe that Progressive Democrats would fit in even though Obama is showing his progressive side?
DhhD
(4,695 posts)through the work of Henry Kissenger, and Presidents Nixon and Ford. See reply # 53.
Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy and Carter wanted peace in the world.
https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0LEVw4_s.5WPx8A_CSl87UF;_ylc=X1MDOTU4MTA0NjkEX3IDMgRmcgMEZ3ByaWQDSEd3X3VzU0pTZjZaTEgzV1c3OWx3QQRuX3JzbHQDMARuX3N1Z2cDMARvcmlnaW4Dc2VhcmNoLnlhaG9vLmNvbQRwb3MDMARwcXN0cgMEcHFzdHJsAwRxc3RybAM0MQRxdWVyeQNDYXJ0ZXIgYnJva2VyZWQgIHBlYWNlIGluIHRoZSBNaWRkbGUgRWFzdAR0X3N0bXADMTQ1ODQ4NDA0Mw--?p=Carter+brokered++peace+in+the+Middle+East&fr=sfp&fr2=sb-top-search&iscqry=
https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AwrBT76Vs.5WZoEAfzCl87UF;_ylc=X1MDOTU4MTA0NjkEX3IDMgRmcgMEZ3ByaWQDZzBTdHkxdkZUaU9Hbm1kUnk5QnphQQRuX3JzbHQDMARuX3N1Z2cDMgRvcmlnaW4Dc2VhcmNoLnlhaG9vLmNvbQRwb3MDMARwcXN0cgMEcHFzdHJsAwRxc3RybAMzNARxdWVyeQNLZW5uZWR5IGFuZCB0aGUgdHdvIHN0YXRlIHNvbHV0aW9uBHRfc3RtcAMxNDU4NDg0MTQx?p=Kennedy+and+the+two+state+solution&fr=sfp&fr2=sb-top-search&iscqry=
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)It's just another lobbying group. Paying off legislators like all the others!
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)put Americans first
Nickel79
(81 posts)a person who supports a candidate that has repeatedly failed on foreign policy issues. HRC was tested and failed, multiple times.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Like a good defense lawyer, AIPAC highlights facts that promote its client while repressing evidence to the contrary. The Israeli right is expert at that.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden/aipac-is-an-awe-inspiring-organization-but-the-right-wing-tilt-is-in-its-dna.premium-1.507791
it's just the way Henry Kissinger wouldn't answer it.
jillan
(39,451 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)in a couple of minutes.
What are government claims to do and what they are actually doing are light years apart.
I give Obama props for some restraint on Syria and Ukraine when the neocons and other foreign policy hawks seemed intent on starting World War III.
Before the next big war, someone has to unpack what we have really been doing in the world and connect it to the causes of every other war in human history to show how absurd the stated reasons for the wars were.
Hekate
(90,662 posts)Too bad Bernie can't be there due to the press of campaign business. It might have been entertaining to watch the clash of contrasts.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)You can bet AIPAC is pouring, flooding, money into HRC's campaign to stop him.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Let the war mongers duke it out.
WillYourVoteBCounted
(14,622 posts)AIPAC supports genocide and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
In 25 days during July 2014, Israel "used more than 50,000 bombs in its war on the civilians of the Gaza Strip: 6,318 missiles have been fired by Air Force jets; 13,866 were fired by the navy; and 30,581 were fired by tanks and artillery stationed on the eastern border of the enclave."
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/13180-israel-has-used-50000-missiles-in-gaza-killing-almost-1500-palestinians
In 25 days during July 2014, Israel "used more than 50,000 bombs in its war on the civilians of the Gaza Strip: 6,318 missiles have been fired by Air Force jets; 13,866 were fired by the navy; and 30,581 were fired by tanks and artillery stationed on the eastern border of the enclave."
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/13180-israel-has-used-50000-
In a 25 day period in July 2014, ISRAEL KILLED 1400 Gazans, with 8,200 people wounded in the four-week operation. Up to 80% of the Palestinian casualties were civilians, according to local non-government organisations and the UN.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/31/gaza-faces-precipice-death-toll-tops-1400
clg311
(119 posts)Reading the 51 Day War by Max Blumenthal. It makes me angry that my tax dollars are supporting this barbarism.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Sad that this, and more, is excused by som many of us here. AIPAC sucks, and I'm glad that Bernie won't speak to them, although I actually would have enjoyed it if he went in there and spoke to them the way he spoke to Liberty University, citing some common interests while not glossing over disagreements.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)That too many American politicians ignore while sucking up to this lobbying group for a few shekels.
EX500rider
(10,842 posts).....according to your numbers they fired over 100,000 bombs/missiles/shells in a highly populated area and only killed 1,500 and you think they were trying to kill civilians? Seems more like they did all they could to limit casualties or the numbers would be 100,000+ dead.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)Oh, ONLY?? That's all? Well, golly fucking gee, how humane of them.
I'd speculate that one of the reasons the numbers weren't much higher is that the Palestinians, having lived through shit like this for the past few DECADES, knew to take shelter in any basement, bunker or hole they could find the moment they knew the mini-war was going hot again.
EX500rider
(10,842 posts)....and yes, that is a incredibly low number for military operations in a urban environment considering the amount of ordnance expended and only possible with the utter and utmost care taken to avoid civilian casualties and I doubt any other country including the US could do half as well to keep civilian deaths as low.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:38 PM - Edit history (1)
live stream on TRNN - They said they'd have it up on youtube. worth checking out. I don't know how supporting all these tax free organizations that support some of these policies would be kosher with Bernie
WillYourVoteBCounted
(14,622 posts)it is all about getting congress to fund Israel to the tune of $3B a year for weapons etc,
while Israel takes more and more Palestinian land and kills more and more Palestinians.
Taking someone else's land, not just Palestinians but Jordanians, Syrians, is what Israel does.
It is racism, zionism, where only "one people" have human rights.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Bernie is not an Israel-right-or-wrong candidate. He supports a two-state solution. AIPAC has far too much influence on our politicians already.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Every member of AIPAC is a United States citizen.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)There can be no other explanation.
Really? Was this needed?
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)policies.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)that its interests should be the top priority of any US presidential candidate.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Uhmercan Irishman
(16 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)For reals, that would not be a place to be and he has a perfectly good reason not to attend
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)*cough*
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)Damn glad I did.
burrowowl
(17,639 posts)KPN
(15,643 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)can't attend the AIPAC convention because he never learned how to kneel and kiss the money ring.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Probably the smart move anyway. Everybody knows foreign affairs ain't his thang.
Maybe he can see Canada from his house.
Besides.. as president that whole foreign affairs thing is overrated.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)Fixed it for you
jillan
(39,451 posts)Stands in the way of peace in the Middle East
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)last week.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)or public statements on Israeli Palestinian issues.
Wolf Frankula
(3,600 posts)I hope to vote for him in the primary and General Election.
American pols at the AIPAC convention.
"May I please, please lick Binyamin Nuttyyahoo's asshole clean?"
"May I please, please eat Israel's shit?"
"We will happily starve our people to make Israel fat."
AIPAC are foreign agents and should be made to register as such. Israel is NOT our friend.
Wolf
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Membership in AIPAC is restricted to US citizens.
LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)but what happens if he's elected President? He can't hide from world affairs then. Foreign policy is a very big part of the presidency today. Pretending nothing is happening outside our country would be dangerous to us all.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)They won't be able to twist his words later on.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)I'm glad he's not going to be a group whose only priority is Zionism. They don't believe in a two state solution. It is primarily a hard liners lobbying organziation.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)AIPAC actually explicitly supports and advocates for a two-state solution.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/aipac-chief-urges-bipartisanship-two-state-solution/
From the AIPAC website:
AIPAC strongly supports a two-state solution and works tirelessly to bring peace to the region. A two-state solution a Jewish state of Israel living in peace with a demilitarized Palestinian state with an end to all claims is the clear path to resolving this generations-old conflict.
http://www.aipac.org/learn/issues/issue-display?issueid=%7B8DB2B03A-3F5F-4A92-BED7-3CFDE9C87609%7D
Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
harun
(11,348 posts)Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
tabasco
(22,974 posts)These corrupt assholes have way too much influence on the U.S. government.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)I turned it on, thinking that Joe Biden would be speaking - he wasn't. A man, I did not recognize was and he spoke of intending to introduce legislation to keep Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. He was well received - even as he said that the multinational, historic Iran deal did not do that ... it would just delay it. That this mind set is STILL what works at AIPAC shows that they are completely at oods with all but a few militant Democrats, the Republicans, the Israelis and maybe some militant Sunni countries!
This does NOT represent where the American Jewish people are and it is as repugnant that candidates are pandering to them as it is that they pander to Sheldon Adleson. The sad thing is their extreme position med more mainstream Jewish organizations like some of the Jewish Federations who backed them on Iran. I was speaking to a leader of one at a synagogue event and it was interesting how we talked past each other rather than to each other - though I did understand his point. Jews not refusing to contribute are hurting the good work they actually do. I do not think he got my point that THIS was a reason they should not have used their outreach against Obama. His response was to ask if I trusted Netanyahu - and the conversation ended when I said no, but I do trust Kerry, Obama and the entire UN security council.
Looking back at the conversation, it started as he spoke of how many federations had lost donations. Given that many big donors are either Republican or not affected by politics, this suggests that there are many American Jews very angry that AIPAC and Netanyahu claim to speak for them.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Haven't found a transcript yet online though.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)It is unfortunate that Israel has been led by a PM like Netanyahu instead of someone more reasonable who might have been more amenable to the Obama administration's attempts to broker a long term peace deal.