Law Enforcement Investigators Seek Out Private DNA Databases
Source: Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Investigators are broadening their DNA searches beyond government databases and demanding genetic information from companies that do ancestry research for their customers.
Two major companies that research family lineage for fees around $200 say that over the last two years, they have received law enforcement demands for individual's genetic information stored in their DNA databases.
Ancestry.com and competitor 23andme report a total of five requests from law agencies for the genetic material of six individuals in their growing databases of hundreds of thousands. Ancestry.com turned over one person's data for an investigation into the murder and rape of an 18-year-old woman in Idaho Falls, Idaho. 23andme has received four other court orders but persuaded investigators to withdraw the requests.
The companies say law enforcement demands for genetic information are rare.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ANCESTRY_COMPANIES_PRIVACY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-03-26-11-42-30
Submit you lowly eaters/breeders/takers...it is a privilege to reside in these "United" State of ??? If you aren't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear...
jhart3333
(332 posts)Give me some guarantees of privacy and I might think about it. This is ridiculous.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)And it's not just law enforcement - I can picture employers trying to get it.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)for exactly this reason. ugh.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)This seems similar to me. It looks like until we are all numbered with tattoos or bonegrafts, the various government agencies; "investigators" will continue to invade the privacy of American citizens as much as they can - with the gleeful support of most of our politicians. Consider the continued existence and promotion of the so called "Patriot Act" - they can call this ugly monster by different names, but it remains an ugly monster nonetheless.
Those who insist that they "have nothing to hide" are ignoring the potential for (and almost inevitability of) abuse. Of course these companies say law enforcement demands for genetic information are rare - and they will claim this whether it is true or not, because they do not want to frighten their customers. There is, however, no strong safeguard in place to protect your privacy.
Consider the current makeup of our government. Consider how many people are working within it who are racist, xenophobic, corrupt, those who act with deliberate malice against minorities, the poor - and everyone who isn't a campaign donor. Now imagine them with someone like Donald Trump ("Let's build a wall to keep out the Mexicans - and ban Muslims/force them to register" or Ted Cruz ("Let's Patrol Muslim neighborhoods" at the helm. How would such information be used by such individuals given their partisan strength in the house and Senate? Would there be any serious oversight? When people have the power to claim your very DNA without a conviction or even indictment... we are living in dangerous times.
The continued over-reach of government agencies and investigators, the fact that the media largely ignores it and the public is largely unaware... is more than a little disturbing.
It's one thing when you have a warrant, it's one thing when you have something beyond reasonable suspicion - but how many of our rights... how much of our privacy... will we allow to be taken away before we do something about it?
airplaneman
(1,240 posts)Imagine if ancestry.com mixed up two DNA samples and someone was arrested for a crime they did not commit because of that. My wife was blacklisted by cashX for six month because
someone transposed a drivers licence number. Errors like this can haunt you for a long time in unknown ways.
-Airplane.
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
safeinOhio
(32,729 posts)They are the riskiest people in our country. My Ex was a cop and she always said she was member of the biggest gang in the county. We might even catch some cops the cameras missed.
I'd bet they would be the first to say it violates their rights.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)Would Trump want to deport anyone with, say, 25% "Muslim" DNA?
Martak Sarno
(77 posts)When every LEO, when every politician, when every CEO,upper, middle or lower level business person and their employees, when every banker and Wall Streeter, when every gun owner, when every teacher or public servant and when every service man and woman has their DNA recorded and made publically available, I'll consider offering mine.
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)because I want to know my ancestry. The sharing of info with the FBI has stopped me. Is there any overseas alternative?
Socal31
(2,484 posts)Send in your DNA with a fake name and pay with a VISA gift card that can bear any name you choose.
Edit: Sounds like a way you can temporarily frame someone else for a crime until their DNA is pulled directly from them and re-checked. It doesn't happen as fast as in CSI....someone would be arrested and seen as guilty for weeks if not months.