Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,425 posts)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:50 PM Jun 2016

Wyoming judge can’t refuse to marry gay couples, group says

Source: Casper Star-Tribune; Wyoming News.com

Wyoming judge can’t refuse to marry gay couples, group says

By Lillian Schrock, Casper Star-Tribune 5 hrs ago

CASPER - A Pinedale magistrate’s constitutional rights to free speech and religious freedom do not allow her to refuse to marry gay couples, the Wyoming judicial ethics commission argues in a brief filed before the state Supreme Court. ... The Wyoming Supreme Court will decide if Pinedale municipal judge and circuit court magistrate Ruth Neely should be removed from her position.

Neely’s constitutional rights do not “exempt her from complying with the Wyoming Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibits such conduct by a judge and to which she swore her oath to abide by as a judicial officer for the State of Wyoming,” the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics wrote in a brief filed Wednesday.

The brief comes in response to a document filed by Neely in April in which she fought the judicial ethics commission’s recommendation to remove her from office. Neely is being represented by attorneys from the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group.

Neely’s attorneys argued the Commission’s actions violate her rights to free speech and free exercise of religion. They further asserted Neely has discretion when exercising her authority to perform marriages and that she could turn away a couple for any number of reasons. ... The attorneys noted Neely has not been asked to perform a same-sex marriage, and that she has been suspended from her role as a magistrate and is not currently performing marriages.

Read more: http://www.wyomingnews.com/news/wyoming-judge-can-t-refuse-to-marry-gay-couples-group/article_0be13aa4-36a2-11e6-a656-1b28abf8c224.html



The headline "Wyoming judge can’t refuse to marry gay couples, group says " is a little deceptive. There has been no ruling on this. The headline merely reflects the argument being made by the Wyoming judicial ethics commission.

My point is that Obergefell is a year old this week, and yet I keep reading the same old story. SMH.

More accurate, but 19 hours old:

Judicial ethics group says judge not exempt from marrying gay couples

Lillian Schrock 307-266-0574, Lillian.Schrock@trib.com

19 hrs ago

A Pinedale magistrate’s constitutional rights to free speech and religious freedom do not allow her to refuse to marry gay couples, the Wyoming judicial ethics commission argues in a brief filed before the state Supreme Court.

The Wyoming Supreme Court will decide if Pinedale municipal judge and circuit court magistrate Ruth Neely should be removed from her position.

Neely’s constitutional rights do not “exempt her from complying with the Wyoming Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibits such conduct by a judge and to which she swore her oath to abide by as a judicial officer for the State of Wyoming,” the Wyoming Commission on Judicial Conduct and Ethics wrote in a brief filed Wednesday.

The brief comes in response to a document filed by Neely in April in which she fought the judicial ethics commission’s recommendation to remove her from office. Neely is being represented by attorneys from the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group.
....

Follow crime and courts reporter Lillian Schrock on Twitter @lillieschrock.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wyoming judge can’t refuse to marry gay couples, group says (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2016 OP
Technically the title is not deceptive Tempest Jun 2016 #1

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
1. Technically the title is not deceptive
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jun 2016

"Group Says" is never intended to denote a judicial ruling.

It would say "Court Rules" or the like if that was so.

I knew just from reading the headline it was not a ruling or court decision and was an opinion of a group with an interest in the issue.

Just saying.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wyoming judge can’t refus...