Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 09:42 PM Aug 2016

Court says feds can’t prosecute for medical pot use OKd by state

Source: sfgate.com

In a potential legal breakthrough for medical marijuana, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that the Justice Department cannot prosecute anyone who grows, supplies or uses the drug for medical purposes under state law because Congress has barred federal intervention.

The decision by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco was written by one of its most conservative judges, Diarmuid O’Scannlain, and was the first by any appeals court to prohibit federal prosecutions under spending restrictions enacted by Congress. First passed in 2014 and renewed through September, the budget amendment forbids the Justice Department to spend any money to prevent California and other states from “implementing their own state laws” that authorize the medical use of marijuana.

The restrictions do not apply to state laws authorizing the personal use of marijuana, which California voters will consider in November. Although the drug remains illegal under federal law, the Obama administration says it has instructed federal prosecutors not to file charges against those who are following state laws.

But prosecutions and other federal actions against state-authorized marijuana suppliers have not ended. The government is still trying to shut down dispensaries, like the huge Harborside Medical Center in Oakland, and has refused to dismiss criminal cases it filed in the past, like those of the medical marijuana retailers and growers in Tuesday’s case.

<more>

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Court-says-feds-can-t-prosecute-for-legal-9146275.php



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court says feds can’t prosecute for medical pot use OKd by state (Original Post) jpak Aug 2016 OP
Good ruling. christx30 Aug 2016 #1
What ruling might be needed for DorothyG Aug 2016 #3
Well, the court would have to rule christx30 Aug 2016 #4
Well I honestly dont foresee SCOTUS ever making a ruling that the federal cstanleytech Aug 2016 #5
Oh I agree completely. christx30 Aug 2016 #7
Well you don't necessarily need a friendly Democratic cstanleytech Aug 2016 #8
excellent! k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2016 #2
EAT IT DEA! Rex Aug 2016 #6
um TeamPooka Aug 2016 #9
Baby step by baby step StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #10
Worrisome awoke_in_2003 Aug 2016 #11
No, that isn't what the ruling says . . . markpkessinger Aug 2016 #12
I hope people remember that this is only for medicinal ripcord Aug 2016 #13

christx30

(6,241 posts)
4. Well, the court would have to rule
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 10:07 PM
Aug 2016

that the feds have no business regulating certain controlled substances. But until that happens, we just have to hope that the good people of Kansas are able to convince their state reps that marijuana has therapeutic qualities. So people are pretty much at the mercy of either state reps for the feds.

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
5. Well I honestly dont foresee SCOTUS ever making a ruling that the federal
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 10:22 PM
Aug 2016

government has no business regulating any kind of drugs, not that its an issue in this case since the court apparently only made the ruling that they did because the spending restrictions by Congress specifically ties the federal agencies hands over spending any federal money to pursue federal charges at this time.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
7. Oh I agree completely.
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 10:40 PM
Aug 2016

So it's up to the individual states to make medical marijuana legal. And while it is still federally illegal, they're not allowed to spend any money and enforcing that law in states that allow it.
So for those of us that care about that kind of thing, is now more important than ever to get as many friendly Democrats into state office.
And therefore it is now more important than ever to get out the vote during off year elections.

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
8. Well you don't necessarily need a friendly Democratic
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 11:06 PM
Aug 2016

Last edited Wed Aug 17, 2016, 12:32 AM - Edit history (1)

as almost any decent person will do even a Republican providing of course you can find one that isn't currently doing a deep probing personal inspection of their own prostate with their head.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
11. Worrisome
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 01:07 AM
Aug 2016

While i want marijuana legalized, this says that state law trumps federal. At one time, state law said slavery was legal.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
12. No, that isn't what the ruling says . . .
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 01:19 AM
Aug 2016

. . . It says that another federal law passed by Congress invalidates federal prosecutions in states that legalize marijuana.

ripcord

(5,408 posts)
13. I hope people remember that this is only for medicinal
Wed Aug 17, 2016, 11:25 AM
Aug 2016

Recreational use is not covered under this ruling.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court says feds can’t pro...