Sen. Lindsey Graham On Trump: 'Nobody Knows Where The Bottom Is At'
Source: Talking Points Memo
By LAUREN FOX Published AUGUST 19, 2016, 9:54 AM EDT
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is increasingly concerned that Donald Trump will cost his party the majority in the U.S. Senate.
In a New York Times article Friday, Graham told the paper that people are getting pretty nervous about our candidates because hes in a death spiral here and nobody knows where the bottom is at."
In races across the country, Hillary Clinton's double digit leads are making it almost impossible for Republican candidates to stay afloat. Yet, many in the party worry that completely disavowing Trump at this point could make matters worse as Republican voters may not even show up at the polls.
"Its going to be like Weekend at Bernies you got to make him look alive, even if hes not, Graham told the Times.
###
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/graham-on-trump-nobody-knows-where-the-bottom-is-at
mothra1orbit
(231 posts)that the bottom is behind the At on Preposition Street.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 19, 2016, 02:28 PM - Edit history (1)
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Way past time for them to start wondering.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)That the bottom was between the A and the T.
LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)At home I am always called the grammar police. Where you at? drives me crazy..
Also, the "amount of people".... and pundits, please learn the difference between less and fewer..
Thanks for letting me rant.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Bucky
(54,020 posts)There's not a reason on earth to avoid ending a sentence with a preposition. Some 19th Century grammarian pulled this random "rule" out of his ass two centuries ago and unquestioning followers have been parroting it, against all sense, ever since.
As Winston Churchill once said "This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put."
PatSeg
(47,496 posts)not to end a sentence with a preposition, but trying to stick to that rule makes for some very awkward sentences. It is definitely archaic, though in Graham's case "Nobody knows where the bottom is" would have been sufficient.
Good example - "This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put."
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)"Where" already includes the concept of a location in space. The "at" is wrong because it is superfluous. Consider the response pairs below with similar grammar and syntax:
"Where is the bottom at?" "It's at over there."
"Where is the bottom?" "It's over there."
The declarative makes the incorrect nature of the interrogative more prominent, but the "at" is equally incorrect in both.
It isn't so much the preposition at the end of the sentence, it is because it has no place in that sentence. It would be equally incorrect to say "Where at is the bottom?"
Bucky
(54,020 posts)This "rule" drove all my English prof's batty in college. If you ever wanna see an editor's head explode, try correcting them with this rule. It's the syntactic equivalent of saying "irregardless".
PatSeg
(47,496 posts)Sorry, couldn't resist.
While working on my family tree, I've encountered a lot of old documents and I realized that so many of those "written in stone" rules were very recent and arbitrary. Variations in spelling alone were surprising. It seems that even well educated people frequently spelled phonetically over the past 3 or 4 centuries. I suppose that could vary according to how a particular person pronounced a word.
I believe that the use of grammar and punctuation should be to make something more intelligible, not to adhere to an outdated rule.
Bucky
(54,020 posts)including an argument over whether one mark is a meaning-altering comma, or just a smudge on the paper.
http://lexfridman.com/blogs/thoughts/2011/01/04/eminent-domain-comma-or-smudge/
In the 16th Century, Will Shakespeare didn't even spell his own name consistently.
As for your question, the rule is: you may end your sentence with a preposition. A preposition can go anywhere an adverb can go.
Obviously you should avoid redundancy. "Where is the bottom at?" is bad syntax, but not necessarily bad grammar. "When are you coming over?" is quite acceptable.
PatSeg
(47,496 posts)spelled their names in more than one way. It didn't appear to be a big deal.
Some of my better English teachers stressed trimming sentences of unnecessary and/or redundant words. Those are the teachers who still lurk in the back of my mind.
mothra1orbit
(231 posts)that wouldn't be the reason for my grandmother's objection. The problem with "where the bottom is at" is that the "at" is superfluous. Plus it makes the speaker sound trashy.
Bucky
(54,020 posts)A statement like "I didn't say you were not welcome here" is syntactically impure, but carries a subtler meaning than cleaning it up and just saying "You are welcome here."
I say to my friends "Where're yall at?" all the time. It conveys intimacy where the more direct "Where are you?" is only a simple inquiry. In it also implies a greater urgency.
Obviously "trashy" is a subjective standard. I don't think your grandmama would approve of me.
niyad
(113,329 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)Psychedelic shack,
that's where it's at
mothra1orbit
(231 posts)It's the law.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)anamandujano
(7,004 posts)liberal N proud
(60,335 posts)This is the fruit or your efforts of obstruction and hate.
Suck on it!
trusty elf
(7,394 posts)[img][/img]
bucolic_frolic
(43,176 posts)he's still attracting crowds, the greatest crowds, most loving crowds,
eager to take pics
signs of a healthy dialogue
radicalliberal
(907 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Hmmm.....
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)OnDoutside
(19,960 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,176 posts)wherever you go
Demoralize these cretins, this reckoning has been 36 years in the making
and we're going to make the most of it, just like they would
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Lynda Carter, doing that hand thing:
Botany
(70,516 posts)Do you remember your 7 year 77 million $ blow job hunt? That helped to build
the trashing of America by the right wing in order to gain or keep power and in that
climate a piece of shit like Trump could grow and fester.
still_one
(92,217 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)still_one
(92,217 posts)comes out of a stock market analysts comments
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Must....resist...
closeupready
(29,503 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)Too damn easy...
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)[youtube]
[/youtube]Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I don't know where bottom is either, but I know it can't be too low enough!
jalan48
(13,870 posts)Nixon and Reagan would be considered liberals by today's Republicans.
niyad
(113,329 posts)been digging this hole for nearly four decades, and you haven't stopped yet. der drumpfenfuhrer is every wish of the pukes, writ large.
choke on it.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...perfectly. The Republicans are trying to keep the dead corpse of their party looking alive.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Mr. "Let's Build More Nuclear Plants When We Still Have Nowhere to Put the Waste" should be toast.
ABLEZEROSIX
(13 posts)Oh, that's right .... the ATMOSPHERE!
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)What Graham doesn't know about that ,that being what or where is the figurative bottom ,it is Donald Trump and Trump who is known for being completely over the top,also has his way about that so called bottom. It just must make perfect sense that Trump will or has put a hole in the bottom of the bottom and where it goes is who or hell knows. What that means is, at that so called bottom,Trump has himself a little slip shot, but, there is no escape. That might even be a permanent vacation and hell too.,
ABLEZEROSIX
(13 posts)but he's right about "no bottom" to Trump. But that's true for Trump, Graham and the tens of millions of hateful imbeciles who call themselves "republicans."
Doc_Technical
(3,526 posts)What did you end your sentence with a preposition for?
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)0rganism
(23,956 posts)and i hope he hits it in late October/early November