Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal refuses to implement Obamacare despite Supreme Court ruling
Source: Yahoo
"We're not going to start implementing Obamacare," Jindal said during a conference call with Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. "We're committed to working to elect Gov. Romney to repeal Obamacare."
Under the Affordable Care Act, states must set up a health insurance exchange program by Jan. 1, 2014, and will receive grants from the federal government to implement it. Several Republican governors, including both Jindal and McDonnell, have put off setting up the exchanges in the hope that the law would be repealed or struck down by the court. Now that the law has been upheld, Jindal said he won't change course and is looking to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to lead the repeal effort if he takes office in 2013.
"Here in Louisiana we have not applied for the grants, we have not accepted many of these dollars, we're not implementing the exchanges," Jindal said. "We don't think it makes any sense to implement Obamacare in Louisiana. We're going to do what we can to fight it."
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/louisiana-gov-bobby-jindal-refuses-implement-obamacare-despite-152429092.html
cindyperry2010
(846 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)onenote
(45,993 posts)The law provides that if a state elects not to set up an exchange, the Federal government will set one up for that state.
Response to cindyperry2010 (Reply #1)
Post removed
Response to cindyperry2010 (Reply #1)
Post removed
cindyperry2010
(846 posts)you are so much smarter than all the rest of us bow before the rude jerk
otohara
(24,135 posts)applause
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,175 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)How does this jackass keeps getting elected?
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)their wisdom of whom they elect.
Response to RKP5637 (Reply #29)
Post removed
Roland99
(53,345 posts)Michigan has a Repuke Gov and a Repuke-led legislature.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)in 2011. As usual, the freepers are clueless.
Harry Monroe
(2,935 posts)nanabugg
(2,198 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:57 PM - Edit history (1)
This should be what the Dems talk about on guest appearances on TV. They are setting the tone for out and out disorder, unlawful acts, and defiance of our own laws. The party of "Law and Order" has become the party of lawlessness and disorder. They have effectively stopped the fight against illegal arms sales to foreign countries thanks to the NRA influence, they are encouraging more fraud and abuse by fighting against more regulation of the banking and other financial institutions, and they are encouraging outside terrorists to use their anti-government rhetoric to attract anarchists and foreign sympathizers with terrorists groups like al-quadea to swell their ranks with anti-American hooligans.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(68,369 posts)happyslug
(14,779 posts)After the attacked had failed, Picket, who as commander of the attacking unit had stayed in the rear, where he belonged, so he could better direct the attacking units (i.e. shift any artillery support as needed, shift reinforcement units as needed).
Anyway, after the charge had failed, Lee was forming his surviving units to resist an expected Union Counter attack. Seeing Picket just standing around, he yelled at him to get his men ready. Picket's response is legendary "I have no men". Lee's response is also known "You did not lose them, I did" and rode away to prepare for the expected Counter attack (Which did NOT occur).
mahatmakanejeeves
(68,369 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:14 AM - Edit history (1)
Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia were headed through Frederick County,* Maryland, on their way north. Soon they would be in the obscure rail junction of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
That flag at the Wikipedia page? I've never seen that before now. I don't keep up with that stuff, though.
Faulkner:
Pickett's Charge
For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he wants it, there is the instant when it's still not yet two oclock on that July afternoon in 1863, the brigades are in position behind the rail fence, the guns are laid and ready in the woods and the furled flags are already loosened to break out and Pickett himself with his long oiled ringlets and his hat in one hand probably and his sword in the other looking up the hill waiting for Longstreet to give the word and it's all in the balance, it hasn't happened yet, it hasn't even begun yet, it not only hasn't begun yet but there is stll time for it not to begin against that position and those circumstances which made more men than Garnett and Kemper and Armstead and Wilcox look grave yet it's going to begin, we all know that, we have come too far with too much at stake and that moment doesn't need even a fourteen-year-old boy to think This time. Maybe this time with all this much to lose and all this much to gain: Pennsylvania, Maryland, the world, the golden dome of Washington itself to crown with desperate and unbelievable victory the desperate gamble, the cast made two years ago....
* Correction: Washington County, Maryland. See: Hotchkiss map at Library of Congress
mahatmakanejeeves
(68,369 posts)This is a more fitting reference, on the grounds that it involved many states, not just Virginia.
Southern Manifesto
The Declaration of Constitutional Principles (known informally as the Southern Manifesto) was a document written in February and March 1956, in the United States Congress, in opposition to racial integration in public places. The manifesto was signed by 99 politicians (97 Democrats) from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. The document was largely drawn up to counter the landmark Supreme Court 1954 ruling Brown v. Board of Education.
SDjack
(1,448 posts)For states that don't set up exchanges to implement the law, Pres. Obama will send federal carpet baggers in to set it up and operate it. That means no participation by the state. I don't think that Bobby wants to lose out on the "control" and patronage.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Incitatus
(5,317 posts)I'm no lawyer, but for Bobby to try something like that sounds like treason.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)think some of these governors play with a full deck. I could imagine hearing threats of this or that. Some of these governors have no respect and do not care for all of the people in their state. Often they seem to represent a fringe majority that barely got them into office.
Brother Buzz
(39,614 posts)FirstLight
(15,771 posts)romney/jindal = dumb & dumber!
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)dynasaw
(999 posts)Refusing to Implement should make them law breakers not to mention throwing their constituencies under the bus.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)don't have to implement the medicaid provisions. Still celebrating?
onenote
(45,993 posts)Its the Health Insurance exchange provision and the law never mandated that a state set one itself. States were always allowed to elect not to do so and to let the federal government set up the exchange in that state. There is no penalty in the law for a state that doesn't set up its own exchange.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)At least it does in the Tea Klux Klan version of the Constitution.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)What a loser.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)But don't tell me what to do about insuring the thousands who are uninsured for health care.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)AllyCat
(18,567 posts)Cannot believe this state voted for that crook again. We already have a system in place, but he doesn't want to pay for it. He's cutting Badgercare (including kids). And 57% of Wisconsin thinks that is just grand.
judesedit
(4,586 posts)Poor Wisconsonians. Their governor cares more about and is more loyal to the insurance companies and big pharma than his own constituents.
AllyCat
(18,567 posts)follow the law. They'll find another way, but for now, his own crooked A.G is saying he needs to shut up and put up.
judesedit
(4,586 posts)Poor Louisianans
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)According to the birthers he does not qualify to run for President and VP because at the time of his birth neither of his parents was citizens of the USA. He has made the state of Louisiana worse than they was before his election.
atreides1
(16,799 posts)An anchor baby...
southern_belle
(1,647 posts)just screw all of us that live in this f*cking state (and hell, yes, i would move if i could).
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... that it is real, but it still is funny
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Or something to that effect. Tosh.0 had him on the show for an interview.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)EXORCIST!
I SAW HIS EMPTY HEAD TWIST A 360!
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)citizens with open fire, that's in essence what they've been trying to do, kill off the residents of their states in one way or another while the ignorant standby and cheer them on.
Some states/governors are so fucked up they've become places not to visit even to drive through. I feel so sorry for the residents.
Javaman
(65,185 posts)lolly
(3,248 posts)And people like it, he'll be taking credit for it.
Like all the anti-stimulus Republican governors and legislators who showed up to grandstand at ribbon-cutting ceremonies for stimulus funded projects.
NOLALady
(4,003 posts)was discussing death panels with local Doctors.
I couldn't believe it!
The People in this state have the Governor they deserve. SMH!
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)But Jindal now refuses.
hamsterjill
(17,095 posts)I was expecting Rick a/k/a Idiot Perry to pull a stunt like this.
I hope there is legal recourse to FORCE these sore losers into compliance.
aurora the great
(141 posts)Oh give Rick alittle time and Im sure he will join JindaL
justabob
(3,069 posts)He hasn't yet said outright that he won't follow the law, but.....Texas government is not willing to accept Medicaid expansion, and They have not done any work yet on the policy exchange. There are also many lawsuits already filed and more in the works according to what I read yesterday.
ronwelldobbs
(28 posts)And send Gringo Goodhair back to the Panhandle.
And good riddance!
hamsterjill
(17,095 posts)As a life long Texan, I join in your exuberation at the time when we get to say "good riddance" to Perry! He's a complete and utter idiot!
joycejnr
(326 posts)magic59
(429 posts)States that do not implement ACA will lose population and businesses. Its a simple talking point that dems should use. People and businesses will be drawn to states that offer affordable health care options.
JPK
(938 posts)Louisiana is just about not only one of the poorest states it is also one of the most racist. I have been there many times and while their current gov would like to think he's one of the "Boys", he is just a tool and the political mafia in that state would dump him so fast if he didn't do what he was supposed to do, he'd be on a boat back to India. Louisiana is a shit hole like AL, MS, GA, SC and NC. States with a really uneducated populace.
juajen
(8,515 posts)who live in this state. I came to Louisiana in 1982 because my husband was employed by a company that sent him here. I love this state, and it has a lot of charm. We have a wonderful culture. Many of us are in hate with jindal. I do agree that politics in Southern states are colorful, to say the least. I am a progressive democrat and was born and raised in the South.
BillyJack
(819 posts)AJTheMan
(288 posts)I 100% hope he is selected to run for V.P. so he can get the hell out of here. But wait, that would only work if the Republicans win the White House. Oh god. Four more years of Piyush Jindal.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Kind of like the repukes emphasizing the "Hussein" in Barack Obama.
tblue
(16,350 posts)Just go away.
Keefer
(713 posts)Good for him. With Roberts on our side now, Jindal will be out-voted soon enough.
.
DonCoquixote
(13,944 posts)Into the coal mine to see what happens. I know Rick Scott will probably be next.
JCMach1
(29,100 posts)It is my understanding that's what the law provides for.
And while the Federal Government can't REMOVE Medicaid funds, it can NOT INCREASE it.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...and by a bigger wanker than you'll ever be buddy.

- ''Conservatives'' are so boring. I don't believe Jindal's ever had an original idea. Except for maybe changing his name from Piyush to Bobby......
K&R
Ferretherder
(1,448 posts)Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he has absolutely NO CARE OR CONCERN, WHATSOEVER, for the people who he represents.
Thanks a lot, you idiot tool!
Fuckin' dick.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Then the Feds will do it for him -- for example, setting up an exchange. At least, that's the way I understand ACA works.
onenote
(45,993 posts)MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)onenote
(45,993 posts)the federal government does it for them.
I don't approve of any governor or state legislature deferring to the federal government to set up the exchanges, but the allows them to do so and a lot of the comments on this thread appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the law.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)As long as he has his.....
ronwelldobbs
(28 posts)See how they like that.
onenote
(45,993 posts)And, by the way, the law doesn't require a state to set up exchanges -- in fact it expressly allows states to opt out of doing so, in which case the federal government will step in and set up the exchange for that state.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)hypocrite fool assholes...I'm telling you they are pushing farther and farther every year and it will end in another rebellion crushed and a party outlawed...once they decide to disobey the rule of federal law then they are treasonous...!!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I haven't read every comment in this thread (so forgive me if I'm repeating another comment); but Jindal (and McDonnell) refusing to set up the state exchange is a good thing in the march to single payer.
Their refusal (failure) triggers the provision in the ACA where the fed sets up and runs the exchange. Bobby "Deer in headlights" won't be able to later claim that he did something on this matter, as he did with the stimulus dollars.
But there is nothing in the law that would prevent the fed from including a Vermont-style single-payer option as one insurance choices.
You hear that Kathryn Sebelius? In every state that refuses (fails) to set up the exchanges, include a public option as a choice.
Roland99
(53,345 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)So we can have public options in the federally created exchanges in three states.
I'm holding out hope that Arizona will do likewise; but from what I understand, this state has drawn down some set-up funding.