Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Roland99

(53,345 posts)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:02 PM Jun 2012

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal refuses to implement Obamacare despite Supreme Court ruling

Source: Yahoo

The Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama's health care law on Thursday, but Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a possible Republican vice presidential contender who has refused to establish a federally mandated health care exchange in his state, said Friday that he will continue to ignore it.

"We're not going to start implementing Obamacare," Jindal said during a conference call with Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. "We're committed to working to elect Gov. Romney to repeal Obamacare."

Under the Affordable Care Act, states must set up a health insurance exchange program by Jan. 1, 2014, and will receive grants from the federal government to implement it. Several Republican governors, including both Jindal and McDonnell, have put off setting up the exchanges in the hope that the law would be repealed or struck down by the court. Now that the law has been upheld, Jindal said he won't change course and is looking to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to lead the repeal effort if he takes office in 2013.

"Here in Louisiana we have not applied for the grants, we have not accepted many of these dollars, we're not implementing the exchanges," Jindal said. "We don't think it makes any sense to implement Obamacare in Louisiana. We're going to do what we can to fight it."




Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/louisiana-gov-bobby-jindal-refuses-implement-obamacare-despite-152429092.html






84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal refuses to implement Obamacare despite Supreme Court ruling (Original Post) Roland99 Jun 2012 OP
then they need to sue his dumb ass cindyperry2010 Jun 2012 #1
His "grandstand" is about to go up in flames. nt ladjf Jun 2012 #2
The law provides for the feds to set it up if the states don't act Freddie Stubbs Jun 2012 #17
States are not required to set up exchanges, which will make suing him somewhat difficult onenote Jun 2012 #25
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #30
excuse me cindyperry2010 Jun 2012 #34
Troll is Gone otohara Jul 2012 #84
He is a disgusting idiot. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2012 #3
Too busy cashing in on teaching students that the Loch Ness Monster is real? arcane1 Jun 2012 #4
Louisiana is a poor state and many could benefit from the ACA Seedersandleechers Jun 2012 #5
It gives real insight into why Louisiana remains a poor state with RKP5637 Jun 2012 #29
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #32
ha...the freeper whose post was hidden really has a handle on things, eh? Roland99 Jun 2012 #37
Thanks for posting! I was thinking the same, and CA just got rid of Schwarzenegger RKP5637 Jun 2012 #40
Because people here are idiots Harry Monroe Jun 2012 #49
Why would anyone want to elect officials who defy our own laws? What kind of example is that? nanabugg Jun 2012 #6
They should be called out for what they are, American Terrorists. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2012 #31
Massive Resistance mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2012 #7
Every time I think of Pickett's Charge, I remember the exchange between Picket and Lee happyslug Jun 2012 #21
That was 149 years ago this week. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2012 #74
Southern Manifesto mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2012 #80
Bobby still has tears in his eyes. His staff needs to get a grip and read the ACA. SDjack Jun 2012 #8
Bobby will probably send in the National Guard against the Feds, that's how lame he is. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2012 #35
Of course, the President can take command the National Guard. Incitatus Jun 2012 #55
Oh, I don't think he would really go that far, but then again, I don't RKP5637 Jun 2012 #62
Bobby wants that VP pick Brother Buzz Jun 2012 #9
omg... FirstLight Jun 2012 #11
+1. Exactly. n/t RufusTFirefly Jun 2012 #15
Aren't Governors supposed to Uphold the Law dynasaw Jun 2012 #10
The Roberts decision, which so many on this site are celebrating, said the states former9thward Jun 2012 #16
This isn't the medicaid provision we're discussing onenote Jun 2012 #26
The tenth amendment says governors only have to obey federal laws if they agree with them nxylas Jun 2012 #23
Channeling John C. Calhoun? Adsos Letter Jun 2012 #12
Big Government, get my beaches cleaned up when Big Oil spews all over them! wordpix Jun 2012 #13
brilliant ! Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #59
John Doe Walker is saying the same thing here in Wisco. AllyCat Jun 2012 #14
That election was as crooked as the ones before it. Walker's a loser judesedit Jun 2012 #20
A bit of good news, his right-hand man J.B. Van Hollen (A.G.) has sait he must AllyCat Jul 2012 #71
Pretty bad when LA own governor doesn't want most of the people to have health care judesedit Jun 2012 #18
Bobby Jindal is bad for Louisiana and he is bad for the USA Thinkingabout Jun 2012 #19
So he's like Michelle Malkin atreides1 Jun 2012 #24
Yea, jindal southern_belle Jun 2012 #43
We knew this was coming warrprayer Jun 2012 #22
Yep, that sums it up well! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2012 #36
omg...is that real ?? Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #60
I doubt warrprayer Jun 2012 #61
IIRC, that was something about a online game account being deleted... Thor_MN Jul 2012 #72
QUICK! SOMEONE CALL AN... Amonester Jun 2012 #70
Call the Wah-mbulance too! n/t warrprayer Jul 2012 #73
I'm surprised some of these governors don't outright kill their RKP5637 Jun 2012 #27
little alfred E. jindal will refuse to impliment it until he does. nt Javaman Jun 2012 #33
Yep--and it when it works lolly Jun 2012 #45
A local radio talk show NOLALady Jun 2012 #38
Louisiana sucks up Federal money like a Hoover vacuum. secondvariety Jun 2012 #39
I was expecting it to be Rick Perry hamsterjill Jun 2012 #41
Dumb and Dumberer aurora the great Jun 2012 #50
give him a minute justabob Jun 2012 #63
We Tejanos are waiting for the demographic bomb to go off. ronwelldobbs Jun 2012 #68
Welcome to DU hamsterjill Jul 2012 #78
Time to send in the federal troops! n/t joycejnr Jun 2012 #42
Its simple economics magic59 Jun 2012 #44
The really funny and ironic thing is..... JPK Jun 2012 #46
You are painting with a very broad brush. There are plenty of educated and lovely non-racist people juajen Jun 2012 #48
You are a rare jewel then eom BillyJack Jun 2012 #53
Governor Piyush Jindal is such an embarassment for our state. AJTheMan Jun 2012 #47
I don't like him either, but the "Piyush" stuff smacks of racism. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #82
Go away, Bobby J. tblue Jun 2012 #51
Well... Keefer Jun 2012 #52
And the GOP sends their first canary DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #54
What a dumbass, so he surrenders state power and allows the feds to create the exchange JCMach1 Jun 2012 #56
It's been tried before..... DeSwiss Jun 2012 #57
Yep, thet thar's mah guverner....yessiree! Ferretherder Jun 2012 #58
If Jindal won't implement ACA . . . Brigid Jun 2012 #64
Correct. The law doesn't require states to set up exchanges themselves. onenote Jul 2012 #75
So the People in Red States will be the ones to suffer? The won't be Red for long. MjolnirTime Jun 2012 #65
No, they won't suffer because under the law if a state opts not to set up an exchange, onenote Jul 2012 #76
Yet the asshole will have health insurance for life Marrah_G Jun 2012 #66
Fine, let's cut Louisiana's highway funds then. ronwelldobbs Jun 2012 #67
And how do you propose to do that? onenote Jul 2012 #77
ass-hats only care about the "rule of law" when it is something they want... Evasporque Jun 2012 #69
I must admit ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2012 #79
pRick Scott changed his mind yet again and now Florida will NOT enact the law either. Roland99 Jul 2012 #81
Good ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2012 #83

onenote

(45,993 posts)
25. States are not required to set up exchanges, which will make suing him somewhat difficult
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:53 PM
Jun 2012

The law provides that if a state elects not to set up an exchange, the Federal government will set one up for that state.

Response to cindyperry2010 (Reply #1)

Response to cindyperry2010 (Reply #1)

Seedersandleechers

(3,044 posts)
5. Louisiana is a poor state and many could benefit from the ACA
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:11 PM
Jun 2012

How does this jackass keeps getting elected?

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
29. It gives real insight into why Louisiana remains a poor state with
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:03 PM
Jun 2012

their wisdom of whom they elect.

Response to RKP5637 (Reply #29)

Roland99

(53,345 posts)
37. ha...the freeper whose post was hidden really has a handle on things, eh?
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:05 PM
Jun 2012

Michigan has a Repuke Gov and a Repuke-led legislature.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
40. Thanks for posting! I was thinking the same, and CA just got rid of Schwarzenegger
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:58 PM
Jun 2012

in 2011. As usual, the freepers are clueless.

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
6. Why would anyone want to elect officials who defy our own laws? What kind of example is that?
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:13 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:57 PM - Edit history (1)

This should be what the Dems talk about on guest appearances on TV. They are setting the tone for out and out disorder, unlawful acts, and defiance of our own laws. The party of "Law and Order" has become the party of lawlessness and disorder. They have effectively stopped the fight against illegal arms sales to foreign countries thanks to the NRA influence, they are encouraging more fraud and abuse by fighting against more regulation of the banking and other financial institutions, and they are encouraging outside terrorists to use their anti-government rhetoric to attract anarchists and foreign sympathizers with terrorists groups like al-quadea to swell their ranks with anti-American hooligans.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
21. Every time I think of Pickett's Charge, I remember the exchange between Picket and Lee
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:06 PM
Jun 2012

After the attacked had failed, Picket, who as commander of the attacking unit had stayed in the rear, where he belonged, so he could better direct the attacking units (i.e. shift any artillery support as needed, shift reinforcement units as needed).

Anyway, after the charge had failed, Lee was forming his surviving units to resist an expected Union Counter attack. Seeing Picket just standing around, he yelled at him to get his men ready. Picket's response is legendary "I have no men". Lee's response is also known "You did not lose them, I did" and rode away to prepare for the expected Counter attack (Which did NOT occur).

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,369 posts)
74. That was 149 years ago this week.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 08:43 AM
Jul 2012

Last edited Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:14 AM - Edit history (1)

Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia were headed through Frederick County,* Maryland, on their way north. Soon they would be in the obscure rail junction of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

That flag at the Wikipedia page? I've never seen that before now. I don't keep up with that stuff, though.

Faulkner:

Pickett's Charge

For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he wants it, there is the instant when it's still not yet two oclock on that July afternoon in 1863, the brigades are in position behind the rail fence, the guns are laid and ready in the woods and the furled flags are already loosened to break out and Pickett himself with his long oiled ringlets and his hat in one hand probably and his sword in the other looking up the hill waiting for Longstreet to give the word and it's all in the balance, it hasn't happened yet, it hasn't even begun yet, it not only hasn't begun yet but there is stll time for it not to begin against that position and those circumstances which made more men than Garnett and Kemper and Armstead and Wilcox look grave yet it's going to begin, we all know that, we have come too far with too much at stake and that moment doesn't need even a fourteen-year-old boy to think This time. Maybe this time with all this much to lose and all this much to gain: Pennsylvania, Maryland, the world, the golden dome of Washington itself to crown with desperate and unbelievable victory the desperate gamble, the cast made two years ago....


* Correction: Washington County, Maryland. See: Hotchkiss map at Library of Congress

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,369 posts)
80. Southern Manifesto
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:55 AM
Jul 2012

This is a more fitting reference, on the grounds that it involved many states, not just Virginia.

Southern Manifesto

The Declaration of Constitutional Principles (known informally as the Southern Manifesto) was a document written in February and March 1956, in the United States Congress, in opposition to racial integration in public places. The manifesto was signed by 99 politicians (97 Democrats) from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. The document was largely drawn up to counter the landmark Supreme Court 1954 ruling Brown v. Board of Education.

SDjack

(1,448 posts)
8. Bobby still has tears in his eyes. His staff needs to get a grip and read the ACA.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:19 PM
Jun 2012

For states that don't set up exchanges to implement the law, Pres. Obama will send federal carpet baggers in to set it up and operate it. That means no participation by the state. I don't think that Bobby wants to lose out on the "control" and patronage.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
35. Bobby will probably send in the National Guard against the Feds, that's how lame he is. n/t
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:21 PM
Jun 2012

Incitatus

(5,317 posts)
55. Of course, the President can take command the National Guard.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:56 AM
Jun 2012

I'm no lawyer, but for Bobby to try something like that sounds like treason.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
62. Oh, I don't think he would really go that far, but then again, I don't
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 09:13 AM
Jun 2012

think some of these governors play with a full deck. I could imagine hearing threats of this or that. Some of these governors have no respect and do not care for all of the people in their state. Often they seem to represent a fringe majority that barely got them into office.

dynasaw

(999 posts)
10. Aren't Governors supposed to Uphold the Law
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:27 PM
Jun 2012

Refusing to Implement should make them law breakers not to mention throwing their constituencies under the bus.

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
16. The Roberts decision, which so many on this site are celebrating, said the states
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:49 PM
Jun 2012

don't have to implement the medicaid provisions. Still celebrating?

onenote

(45,993 posts)
26. This isn't the medicaid provision we're discussing
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jun 2012

Its the Health Insurance exchange provision and the law never mandated that a state set one itself. States were always allowed to elect not to do so and to let the federal government set up the exchange in that state. There is no penalty in the law for a state that doesn't set up its own exchange.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
23. The tenth amendment says governors only have to obey federal laws if they agree with them
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jun 2012

At least it does in the Tea Klux Klan version of the Constitution.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
13. Big Government, get my beaches cleaned up when Big Oil spews all over them!
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:33 PM
Jun 2012

But don't tell me what to do about insuring the thousands who are uninsured for health care.

AllyCat

(18,567 posts)
14. John Doe Walker is saying the same thing here in Wisco.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jun 2012

Cannot believe this state voted for that crook again. We already have a system in place, but he doesn't want to pay for it. He's cutting Badgercare (including kids). And 57% of Wisconsin thinks that is just grand.

judesedit

(4,586 posts)
20. That election was as crooked as the ones before it. Walker's a loser
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:02 PM
Jun 2012

Poor Wisconsonians. Their governor cares more about and is more loyal to the insurance companies and big pharma than his own constituents.

AllyCat

(18,567 posts)
71. A bit of good news, his right-hand man J.B. Van Hollen (A.G.) has sait he must
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:01 AM
Jul 2012

follow the law. They'll find another way, but for now, his own crooked A.G is saying he needs to shut up and put up.

judesedit

(4,586 posts)
18. Pretty bad when LA own governor doesn't want most of the people to have health care
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jun 2012

Poor Louisianans

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
19. Bobby Jindal is bad for Louisiana and he is bad for the USA
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:00 PM
Jun 2012

According to the birthers he does not qualify to run for President and VP because at the time of his birth neither of his parents was citizens of the USA. He has made the state of Louisiana worse than they was before his election.

southern_belle

(1,647 posts)
43. Yea, jindal
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jun 2012

just screw all of us that live in this f*cking state (and hell, yes, i would move if i could).

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
72. IIRC, that was something about a online game account being deleted...
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 09:24 AM
Jul 2012

Or something to that effect. Tosh.0 had him on the show for an interview.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
27. I'm surprised some of these governors don't outright kill their
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:58 PM
Jun 2012

citizens with open fire, that's in essence what they've been trying to do, kill off the residents of their states in one way or another while the ignorant standby and cheer them on.

Some states/governors are so fucked up they've become places not to visit even to drive through. I feel so sorry for the residents.

lolly

(3,248 posts)
45. Yep--and it when it works
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jun 2012

And people like it, he'll be taking credit for it.

Like all the anti-stimulus Republican governors and legislators who showed up to grandstand at ribbon-cutting ceremonies for stimulus funded projects.

NOLALady

(4,003 posts)
38. A local radio talk show
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jun 2012

was discussing death panels with local Doctors.

I couldn't believe it!

The People in this state have the Governor they deserve. SMH!

hamsterjill

(17,095 posts)
41. I was expecting it to be Rick Perry
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:15 PM
Jun 2012

I was expecting Rick a/k/a Idiot Perry to pull a stunt like this.

I hope there is legal recourse to FORCE these sore losers into compliance.

justabob

(3,069 posts)
63. give him a minute
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 09:40 AM
Jun 2012

He hasn't yet said outright that he won't follow the law, but.....Texas government is not willing to accept Medicaid expansion, and They have not done any work yet on the policy exchange. There are also many lawsuits already filed and more in the works according to what I read yesterday.

 

ronwelldobbs

(28 posts)
68. We Tejanos are waiting for the demographic bomb to go off.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jun 2012

And send Gringo Goodhair back to the Panhandle.
And good riddance!

hamsterjill

(17,095 posts)
78. Welcome to DU
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:33 AM
Jul 2012

As a life long Texan, I join in your exuberation at the time when we get to say "good riddance" to Perry! He's a complete and utter idiot!

 

magic59

(429 posts)
44. Its simple economics
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:05 PM
Jun 2012

States that do not implement ACA will lose population and businesses. Its a simple talking point that dems should use. People and businesses will be drawn to states that offer affordable health care options.

JPK

(938 posts)
46. The really funny and ironic thing is.....
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:07 PM
Jun 2012

Louisiana is just about not only one of the poorest states it is also one of the most racist. I have been there many times and while their current gov would like to think he's one of the "Boys", he is just a tool and the political mafia in that state would dump him so fast if he didn't do what he was supposed to do, he'd be on a boat back to India. Louisiana is a shit hole like AL, MS, GA, SC and NC. States with a really uneducated populace.

juajen

(8,515 posts)
48. You are painting with a very broad brush. There are plenty of educated and lovely non-racist people
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:36 PM
Jun 2012

who live in this state. I came to Louisiana in 1982 because my husband was employed by a company that sent him here. I love this state, and it has a lot of charm. We have a wonderful culture. Many of us are in hate with jindal. I do agree that politics in Southern states are colorful, to say the least. I am a progressive democrat and was born and raised in the South.

AJTheMan

(288 posts)
47. Governor Piyush Jindal is such an embarassment for our state.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 10:13 PM
Jun 2012

I 100% hope he is selected to run for V.P. so he can get the hell out of here. But wait, that would only work if the Republicans win the White House. Oh god. Four more years of Piyush Jindal.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
82. I don't like him either, but the "Piyush" stuff smacks of racism.
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:06 AM
Jul 2012

Kind of like the repukes emphasizing the "Hussein" in Barack Obama.

Keefer

(713 posts)
52. Well...
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:35 AM
Jun 2012

Good for him. With Roberts on our side now, Jindal will be out-voted soon enough. .

DonCoquixote

(13,944 posts)
54. And the GOP sends their first canary
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:29 AM
Jun 2012

Into the coal mine to see what happens. I know Rick Scott will probably be next.

JCMach1

(29,100 posts)
56. What a dumbass, so he surrenders state power and allows the feds to create the exchange
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:42 AM
Jun 2012

It is my understanding that's what the law provides for.

And while the Federal Government can't REMOVE Medicaid funds, it can NOT INCREASE it.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
57. It's been tried before.....
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 03:46 AM
Jun 2012

...and by a bigger wanker than you'll ever be buddy.



- ''Conservatives'' are so boring. I don't believe Jindal's ever had an original idea. Except for maybe changing his name from Piyush to Bobby......

K&R

Ferretherder

(1,448 posts)
58. Yep, thet thar's mah guverner....yessiree!
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 07:30 AM
Jun 2012

Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he has absolutely NO CARE OR CONCERN, WHATSOEVER, for the people who he represents.

Thanks a lot, you idiot tool!




Fuckin' dick.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
64. If Jindal won't implement ACA . . .
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 09:53 AM
Jun 2012

Then the Feds will do it for him -- for example, setting up an exchange. At least, that's the way I understand ACA works.

onenote

(45,993 posts)
76. No, they won't suffer because under the law if a state opts not to set up an exchange,
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:19 AM
Jul 2012

the federal government does it for them.

I don't approve of any governor or state legislature deferring to the federal government to set up the exchanges, but the allows them to do so and a lot of the comments on this thread appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the law.

onenote

(45,993 posts)
77. And how do you propose to do that?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:21 AM
Jul 2012

And, by the way, the law doesn't require a state to set up exchanges -- in fact it expressly allows states to opt out of doing so, in which case the federal government will step in and set up the exchange for that state.

Evasporque

(2,133 posts)
69. ass-hats only care about the "rule of law" when it is something they want...
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jun 2012

hypocrite fool assholes...I'm telling you they are pushing farther and farther every year and it will end in another rebellion crushed and a party outlawed...once they decide to disobey the rule of federal law then they are treasonous...!!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
79. I must admit ...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 09:51 AM
Jul 2012

I haven't read every comment in this thread (so forgive me if I'm repeating another comment); but Jindal (and McDonnell) refusing to set up the state exchange is a good thing in the march to single payer.

Their refusal (failure) triggers the provision in the ACA where the fed sets up and runs the exchange. Bobby "Deer in headlights" won't be able to later claim that he did something on this matter, as he did with the stimulus dollars.

But there is nothing in the law that would prevent the fed from including a Vermont-style single-payer option as one insurance choices.

You hear that Kathryn Sebelius? In every state that refuses (fails) to set up the exchanges, include a public option as a choice.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
83. Good ...
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:09 AM
Jul 2012

So we can have public options in the federally created exchanges in three states.

I'm holding out hope that Arizona will do likewise; but from what I understand, this state has drawn down some set-up funding.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jind...