Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:09 PM Oct 2016

Kaine: Don't accept info in WikiLeaks dump as 'gospel truth'

Source: The Hill

Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine on Sunday questioned the authenticity of the latest information dump from WikiLeaks, which includes portions of the paid speeches Hillary Clinton gave to major banks.

WikiLeaks on Friday afternoon published a database of 2,060 documents it claims are emails from Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta.

"I don't think we can dig in documents dumped by WikiLeaks and just assume they're all accurate and true," Kaine said on CNN's State of the Union. "Anyone who hacks in to get documents is completely capable of manipulating them."

Kaine added that he has "no way of knowing" the accuracy of the documents but said previous hacks have been connected to the Russian government. "If that is, in fact, true, you cannot accept as gospel truth anything in this document."

-snip-

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/300067-kaine-dont-accept-info-in-wikileaks-dump-as-gospel-truth



State of the Union
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kaine: Don't accept info in WikiLeaks dump as 'gospel truth' (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2016 OP
Wait....is he suggesting a rapist would lie? No!!!!! nt msanthrope Oct 2016 #1
One big clue is in language, Historic NY Oct 2016 #2
Another clue is there have been two versions of some docs. One or both altered therefore. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2016 #6
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #3
The media should never address Wikileaks as an actual credible source... FarPoint Oct 2016 #4
Melania's Euro Speechwriters wrote them bucolic_frolic Oct 2016 #5
In addition to bringing Ukraine into the EU/NATO, Dawson Leery Oct 2016 #7
No awoke_in_2003 Oct 2016 #12
Russian trolls issuing fake documents should not be taken as truth? Rex Oct 2016 #8
What gave it away was... C Moon Oct 2016 #9
A week from now in the interest of "fairness" the media will be all over this. book_worm Oct 2016 #11
Does anyone really think Hillary would say this: OKNancy Oct 2016 #14
And does anyone really give a shit what she said elmac Oct 2016 #15
Dec 1969 #

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
2. One big clue is in language,
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:13 PM
Oct 2016

if they're trying to convince people thats Hillary's spoken word, along with all the errors.

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

FarPoint

(12,352 posts)
4. The media should never address Wikileaks as an actual credible source...
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:18 PM
Oct 2016

Highly suspect as a propaganda, yellow journalist source....subject to " creative editing".

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
7. In addition to bringing Ukraine into the EU/NATO,
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:36 PM
Oct 2016

Hillary needs to work on shutting Wikileaks down. They are but an arm of Putin.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
12. No
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 02:54 PM
Oct 2016

we do not need to support more Eastern bloc countries. They can't pull their weight, and we don't need war with Russia.

C Moon

(12,213 posts)
9. What gave it away was...
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 01:57 PM
Oct 2016

the way Hillary's speeches repeatedly referred to the wall street villains as her "comrades."

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
15. And does anyone really give a shit what she said
Sun Oct 9, 2016, 05:41 PM
Oct 2016

I mean, as a huge Bernie supporter I've heard all the allegations, call to turn over her speeches, and if I were her I wouldn't. Does anyone really think she would go up in front of these banksters and tell them what dirty, rotten scoundrels they were and that she hates capitalism? She got paid good money to make what amounted to feel good speeches. I'm glad she did. She was also in demand and having her speak is a big deal and worth the pay. Wouldn't surprise me if she did berate them a bit for being a part of the problem, poor judgement in the industry, ect...

In the end she is the only candidate worth voting for and will make positive changes for the 99%.
We also must remember that a president is suppose to be everyone's president, not just the far left. She we make decisions that will piss us off, have some right wing leaning advisers, just like Obama did. I believe, overall, that she will probably be the best president since Carter.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kaine: Don't accept info ...