Homeland Security Chairman: Clinton Could Be Impeached If Elected
Source: Talking Points Memo
The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee warned Wednesday on Fox News that Hillary Clinton could be impeached if she were elected, essentially delegitimizing Clinton before Election Day.
Reacting to the FBI's announcement last week that it was reviewing a newly discovered batch of emails related to Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) was emphatic that impeachment would proceed if a criminal indictment of Clinton appeared imminent.
"This investigation will continue whether she wins or not, but assuming she wins and the investigation goes forward, and it looks like an indictment is pending, at that point of time in the Constitution, the House of Representatives would engage in an impeachment trial," McCaul said referring to a House investigation into Clinton's e-mails. "It would go to the Senate, and impeachment proceedings and removal would take place."
McCaul then went on to compare Clinton to Richard Nixon who resigned from the White House rather than face impeachment.
-snip-
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-could-be-impeached-if-elected
SHRED
(28,136 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)because of Hillary Clinton's behavior"---House Homeland Security Chair McCaul
OK, if McCaul is this much of a fanatic, he should not be HHSC. Why is he into Hillary's emails-as-high-crimes instead of investigating those who would harm US, i.e. terrorists and frauds, foreign and domestic?
This guy is like Bush out there clearing brush in TX while Richard Clark was running around Washington trying to get a meeting with Condi or Bushit or anyone high up. The idiots wouldn't listen.
McCaul sounds like the same type of on-the-take idiot.
NastyWomen
(119 posts)He shouldn't be making clearly partisan statements on any news outlet. Trump could be impeached as well.
doc03
(35,332 posts)NastyWomen
(119 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)moreland01
(738 posts)Go back to sleep.
bucolic_frolic
(43,158 posts)and HRC stands in their way
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)John1956PA
(2,654 posts)In reality, the House votes to pass Articles of Impeachment, which are sent to the Senate where the impeachment trial takes place.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)He's in Congress, and doesn't know anything about Congress, how it works, what its job description is, etc.
Standard repug competency.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)for trial. Reason was our patriot Larry Flynt of Hustler Magazine started researching and publishing about the sex lives of the repug impeachers. So at the end of the House "impeachment," even the House idiot repukes were wanting the thing to go away. Of course, they now tout their "impeachment" of Pres. Clinton as a great accomplishment.
And all this over a frigging blowjob.
DFW
(54,372 posts)The Republicans never had the two thirds majority to remove Clinton from office, but the trial did indeed go to the Senate, where even Strom Thurmond told his fellow Republicans that they had nowhere near the two thirds majority to convict Clinton and remove him from office. He therefore told them to get the circus over with ASAP to avoid further embarrassment.
Chief House Inquisitor Henry Hyde, himself guilty of adultery ("youthful indiscretions," he put it when referring to himself), led the whole farce, when he knew perfectly well that his persecution of Clinton would end as nothing more than a footnote to history.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I do remember that after the "impeachment" in the House, it was pretty much all over with Larry Flynt nosing around
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)the ENTIRE MEDIA is running around saying "Bill Clinton was impeached" even the media that aren't serial GOP ass kissers.
NO, he wasn't.
As you noted, ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT were brought up, the senate did not impeach.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)but not convicted.
Articles of Impeachment were passed and sent to the senate for trial.
The senate didn't convict. They didn't have the votes.
If more Rs would have been in the senate, Gore would have been Pres.
mnhtnbb
(31,388 posts)I hope to hell the Dems take the Senate and that voters also kick a few of these obstructionist, windbag, a$$holes out of office.
ananda
(28,859 posts)His seat is secure because it extends out from very blue northwest Austin
out to extremely red Katy, TX. Thus the voters in the rural areas and
Katy outnumber the ones in Austin where our vote counts for nothing
and we are NOT represented.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)at least some sense will be made out of districting
judesedit
(4,438 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)There is no comparison to Nixon here because the charges against him were for such crimes while in office. If Hillary is elected, which I certainly hope is the case, I suspect the FBI would suspend the case during her term in office.
CRH
(1,553 posts)One that I have contemplated would add a sour twist to this election.
Supposing the right succeeds in destabilizing Clinton's campaign and while using the normal GOP voter suppression and polling place games they have used in the past, actually win the electoral college while retaining the Senate and the House; they then proceed to impeach Trump, leaving Vice President elect Pence to take the reins with SC seats in his pocket for the next four years. Not likely, but certainly not impossible either.
More likely is that Clinton will prevail but with the broken momentum of the last week democrats will be unable to retake either house of congress and she will not be able to govern with the usual obstructionism.
Unlike many on this board, I think what has been allowed to happen this past week has very seriously interrupted momentum and has probably cost the democratic party many down ballot seats. It is a travesty, and every bit as serious as the 2000 theft.
Hope I'm wrong, but I have seen the people stampeded too many times before.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Clearly they are running scared already and let us not forget Ford his VP at the time and a fellow Republican pardoned Nixon. This is just grasping at straws and infantile rage at knowing they are going to lose a lot of seats in Congress.
Go ahead McCaul, keep showing how desperate you are. All it really does is build voters resolve against you and your party.
elmac
(4,642 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,455 posts)have', 'could bes', and 'ifs' before they have any proof or evidence. Reminds me of the warm-up to the Iraq invasion. All will have the same disastrous results.
sinkingfeeling
(51,455 posts)have', 'could bes', and 'ifs' before they have any proof or evidence. Reminds me of the warm-up to the Iraq invasion. All will have the same disastrous results.
imanamerican63
(13,787 posts)She will embarrass them all over again!!!!!
moondust
(19,981 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)What a shock.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)The is fuck wants to turn the "Homeland" into the FATHERLAND.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I think an ex-wife leaked that
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)cynzke
(1,254 posts)NO PRESIDENT TO DATE IN OUR HISTORY HAS EVER BEEN REMOVED FROM OFFICE BY IMPEACHMENT. For the GOP to suggest this now is for one purpose only.....TO GET ELECTED OR RE-ELECTED which ever the case may be. The House passes a resolution to draw up articles of impeachment but it is the responsibility of the Senate to hear the case, draw a conclusion and then vote ON whether to IMPEACH. To remove a President requires a 2/3rd's vote of the Senate. A very difficult number to reach although a previous President was ACQUITED by one vote. Even if the Senate reached a consensus for a POTUS to be removed, Tim Kaine/VP would take Hillary's place.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/impeachment.htm
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)anamandujano
(7,004 posts)dalton99
(781 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)There is a reason why they did not want to fight the Nazis.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)duffyduff
(3,251 posts)GOP pols are just blowing smoke out of their asses.
NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)And mandatory 20 year sentence, banned from ever holding a government role again and no chance at parole for government officials injecting themselves into partisan political nonsense. These accusations being hurled around with ZERO facts is ridiculous.
Either that or split the damn country in half and make one half liberal and the other conservative.
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)ABOLISHED! along with the FBI!
Homeland, even sounds Hilteresque!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Sit down and STFU!
Emilybemily
(204 posts)WHEN will this country come up its senses and get rid of these fucking asshole repukes? I am so God damned sick of their inability to do anything of merit.
sotheyclaimDem
(32 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)POS will likely be returned to office.
MADem
(135,425 posts)he won't be impeaching anyone and will be targeted for removal from office for that kind of threatening talk:
bucolic_frolic
(43,158 posts)Not maybe ... WILL!
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)To make them think twice about working to install the VP instead.
Of course, who am I kidding, they would probably also then begin investigations into them.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)why not find some terrorists before they strike instead of Hillary's emails?
Gawd I hate these fuckheads.
Jeb Bartlet
(141 posts)These are not even Clinton's emails. Second there is no indication of any indictable offense. Third it takes a 2/3rds majority of the Senate to actually remove from office and that won't happen under any circumstances. Fourth Nixon resigned because it was very evident that he was going to be impeached and that there were ample votes to remove in the Senate. His own party would have removed Nixon.
This guy is talking out of his ass. Sadly this ignorant assclown is what stupid Republicans send to congress.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Sometimes, that idea is very important to them.
joshdawg
(2,648 posts)You RWNJ's have nothing and you know it.
Her husband was impeached, not removed, and ended his presidency with higher approval ratings than his SCOTUS-appointed successor.
Vinca
(50,270 posts)Does the GOP really want their chosen POTUS spending time in court defending against a child rape charge?
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)wishstar
(5,269 posts)Very irresponsible writing of headline just to sensationalize
wordpix
(18,652 posts)patsimp
(915 posts)Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)They don't realize an impeachment hearing isn't a one-way street. Calling on Dale Bumpers here to give the rebuttal and rip the freaking skin off these Repukes. If you never heard of Dale Bumpers, it's time to look him up.
Well hope she has you visit the oval office in jan of next year......bring your resignation letter.
yup
Yonnie3
(17,437 posts)They would, of course, state some reason. The reason doesn't have to have to have the tiniest bit of truth. This is simply a ploy to discourage Democratic voters and to energize the Republican base. I say bring it on, a$$hole. Waste our tax money, waste our Presidents time, look like an idiot. Avoid doing any real work. Energize the Democratic turnout for the mid-term. Let's see what happens.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Looks like a lot of white men are about to get fired from the FBI. Conservative white men that tried to throw our federal elections.
But YEAH...do go on chairman and realize how thin the ice is, maybe you better start worrying about your own party and their apparent criminal attempt at throwing an election?
No?
Then get your ass voted out of office, people are tired of GOP obstruction. It has worn thin.