Bill Clinton: Trump knows how to get 'angry, white men to vote for him'
Source: Politico
By LOUIS NELSON 12/19/16 08:08 AM EST
President-elect Donald Trump doesnt know much, former President Bill Clinton told a local newspaper earlier this month, but one thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote for him.
Clinton spoke to a reporter from The Record-Review, a weekly newspaper serving the towns of Bedford and Pound Ridge, New York, not far from the Clintons home in Chappaqua, New York. The former president held court earlier this month in Katonah, New York, where he took questions from the reporter and other customers inside a small bookstore.
On the question of Russian cyberattacks damaging the candidacy of his wife, Hillary Clinton, the former president said you would need to have a single-digit IQ not to recognize what was going on. But he blamed FBI Director James Comey for her loss, telling those gathered around him that he had cost her the election by announcing with less than two weeks to go before the election that the bureau was examining fresh evidence related to her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. Clintons comments were published in " target="_blank">the newspapers print edition but have not been published online.
He also scoffed at the regular claim from Trump and his team that the president-elects Election Day win represented a landslide victory, despite the fact that he lost the popular vote. Landslide? I got something like 370 electoral votes, Clinton said, correctly recalling his 1992 total. That was a landslide.
###
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/bill-clinton-trump-hillary-loss-232803
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Yes. Yes he is helping.
(notice how we both provided objective evidence to support our premise?)
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,185 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)Because as a white male, that is how I feel right now. They definitely ruined it this year.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)........
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)... that doesn't cancel their right to vote.
We need a better tactic than that.
brush
(53,776 posts)That's what we need to stop as we actually got 3 million more votes.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)That was all the work of Republicans.
brush
(53,776 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)He only knows how to be himself, but he knew that TV news loved covering him. Angry white men voted for him because he is who they wish they were, and because the TV assured them it was okay.
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)to go get those "angry white men" himself -- especially in the Midwest. He told the truth about Obamacare and most of the very voters we needed were nodding their heads in agreement, while the media stirred themselves into a frenzy about the fact that Bill said something "bad" about Obamacare.
kevink077
(365 posts)I am a white male. The only thing I am angry about is how stupid the majority of white males were by voting for the pervert.
Bucky
(54,003 posts)Of course the sad thing isn't the demographics. The sad thing is that 46% of Americans swallowed that shit, regardless of ethnicity. The 9% of blacks and the 30% of Hispanics voting for Trump are equally appalling.
kevink077
(365 posts)Why has the term "angry white male" has been around for a few decades. White males have it pretty good in this country. what are they so angry about?
Bucky
(54,003 posts)... understanding will elude us.
"White males have it pretty good" is a cliche. You can't understand someone if you start off by invalidating their emotions.
JudyM
(29,236 posts)extremely powerful negative. Far worse than not having something in the first place.
Couple that with one of the most powerful psychological distresses: perceived social ostracism, which we are hard wired to feel as actual pain (confers an evolutionary advantage to be supported as part of the social group), and it's clear that being marginalized from the very top of the social heap, puts you in hyper focus about that loss. And extremely motivated to get back up there, largely to the exclusion of other values. Behavioral Economics 101.
It's anger because they don't have the tools to process it except to turn it into anger. Many white men see the value and justice of diversity, while others just get mad.
And it shouldn't be overlooked that their anger is implicitly "validated" by the Christian Right.
SubjectiveLife78
(67 posts)The feeling they have less and less control over their own life. We're all in that same boat, just that we all blame each other for that. White men blame black people/women. Democrats/Republicans blame Republicans/Democrats. Women blame men. Blacks blame whites. The 99% blames the 1%. Americans blame Russians. Muslims blame the west. The list goes on and on.
We're all prisoners of history. What happened before shapes the environment we live in today, and I think we all want to be able to break free from that in various ways. Of course that's very difficult to do. It's the downside of accumulated knowledge. Everything has been built up a certain way, but you can't go back and fix anything. Like the Electoral College for example. We're all pissed about it, but good luck trying to change it. All we can do is try to build on top of what's already there, but what's already there has thousands and thousands of years of history, momentum, and complexity on its side.
There's no sailing west these days. There's no open frontier. America couldn't even be established as a country if it tried doing it today, which is only the case because America basically wrote the rules of the international system we have. Which is a weird twist of history. Or makes perfect sense. Once you get to the top, you don't want others being able to play that same game.
We have nowhere to go anymore. The world is pretty full. Now we're rapidly adding robots and machines to that equation. Most people are increasingly unnecessary. A lot of people feel that what they want life to be, what they expect it to be, simply doesn't matter. That goes for anyone who is pissed off about anything. Angry white men, angry black men, angry women, angry whoever.
QC
(26,371 posts)moonscape
(4,673 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)Mandated, expensive health insurance with crippling fines for noncompliance? I'm sure some of them are angry about that. And the "if you like your insurance, you can keep it" thing. A lot of them are angry at that loss. You can tell them that the more robust (and expensive) plans are better for them. But a lot of them don't like being told what's best for them. So they vote for someone in the party that has promised to repeal the law that has quadrupled their insurance.
Obamacare may have helped some people. But it has hurt others. If you dismiss the people that are hurt, you'all lose their votes.
harun
(11,348 posts)less and less attainable each year.
There it is in one sentence.
Bucky
(54,003 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)...so I think he's got a point.
The thing is I'm a white male, and I can and do get angry about things, but "Angry White Male" is an entirely different subset of person. It's basically a reactionary who consciously or subconsciously creates a persecution complex around being a white male.
treestar
(82,383 posts)They truly believe the white males are the ones persecuted.
They are the victims. They are told they didn't get the job because of affirmative action. Or claim they were so told.
The other people are all getting something they aren't, in their view.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)trump did?
yagotme
(2,919 posts)in both elections, as I recall.