Romney’s Bain Yielded Private Gains, Socialized Losses
Source: Bloomberg
Mitt Romney touts his business acumen and job-creation record as a key qualification for being the next U.S. president.
Whats clear from a review of the public record during his management of the private-equity firm Bain Capital from 1985 to 1999 is that Romney was fabulously successful in generating high returns for its investors. He did so, in large part, through heavy use of tax-deductible debt, usually to finance outsized dividends for the firms partners and investors. When some of the investments went bad, workers and creditors felt most of the pain. Romney privatized the gains and socialized the losses.
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-15/romney-s-bain-yielded-private-gains-socialized-losses.html
Pale Blue Dot
(16,831 posts)Wow wow wow.
He's toast.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)An article like this does not surprise me at all. I have a Bloomberg terminal at work, so I see them as pretty reasonable. They do have some Nasty op-eds from the likes of Kevin hasset and amity shlaes, but many others are quite reasonable.
Pale Blue Dot
(16,831 posts)However, simply on the basis of their beat, they reach more of the 1% than the MSM.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)yet they have the GALL to say black people want "free stuff:
Pale Blue Dot
(16,831 posts)Romney: He's actually been on welfare this entire time.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)I hope you don't mind, I used your comparison on my facebook page.
"But I hope people understand this, your friends who like Obamacare, you remind them of this, if they want more stuff from government tell them to go vote for the other guy more free stuff."
Mitt Romney
Skittles
(153,169 posts)that's a heck of a lot of "free stuff" for them
Mitt is a complete elitist ASSHOLE and I have no doubt he fails to see the hypocrisy
ode2joi
(26 posts)KARMA !!!!!!!
harun
(11,348 posts)I was having a nice walk at a state park with my wife on Sunday and here comes to old dudes walking by. They were talking about how the Democrats just want everyone to be dependant on the gov't. They have two or three basic false assumptions that they walk around all day grumbling about. Sucks to be them.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)up your ass, it's difficult to remember that you're running
for the President of the United States.
Unknown Quote: "When your up to your ass in alligator's,
it's difficult to remember your main objective is to drain
the swamp".
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Dude is like the Grim Reaper. That entire charade is why American jobs have been lost by the millions. The fuckers can't just leave the companies alone, they have to wrench every last drop of money out of them, and leave the employees in the dust when it goes bankrupt. Why aren't those people in prison???
This is more damaging than the Baingate stuff... what an asshole.
Patiod
(11,816 posts)Americans need to understand what these people do, and how damaging it is to our country.
Why would we elect someone who thinks this is the way to build an economy? It's a way for a very few men to build personal wealth for themselves and their families, and for everyone else to slide out of the middle class.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)Socialism for the rich, socialism for stock market gamblers and corporations. For the rest of us, it's getting to be Randroid Hell.
Wolf
brewens
(13,595 posts)siphoning off as much wealth as possible to his partners. Sound familiar? Exactly what "Chug" Dick Cheney did. The wars and everything else were all about looting and making it and the pack of criminals associated with it wealthier than they already were.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)The two are linked in everyone's mind now -- "retroactive retirement" or not.
quaker bill
(8,224 posts)It is really just a description of the leveraged buyout business model. Romney apparently did it quite well. Buy the firm, load it with debt using the pension fund as collateral to pay yourself, bankrupt the company and use the pension fund to resolve whatever debts it will cover. The taxpayers then pickup the pension fund shortfall through the pension benefit guarantee corporation. It was all the rage in the 80s and early 90's.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Taxpayers DO NOT pick up a pension fund shortfall.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Wow... seeing Mitt Romney and Bain showing up at your company is sort of like seeing Anderson Cooper at a natural disaster or Sanjay Gupta at a disease outbreak: you've got good reason to know it's not going to turn out well...
indie_voter
(1,999 posts)How in the world is he going to recover from all this? I don't think he can release his tax forms because I'm betting whatever is in there could damage him even more, which is saying a lot considering what's been going on.
Wow.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Sweet Schadenfreude.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)The 'shareholders' are not you and me, of course.
They are the fabulously wealthy, Romney's circle.
He would run the country specifically to make more money for the wealthy.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)"Thanks to leverage, 10 of roughly 67 major deals by Bain Capital during Romneys watch produced about 70 percent of the firms profits. Four of those 10 deals, as well as others, later wound up in bankruptcy."
With 4 out of 10 of their major deals killing the victim company while making them billions, 'cannibal capitalism' might be appropriate too.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)That's American capitalism!
blm
(113,065 posts)looted the GS Industries assets before he bankrupted it.
Blue Owl
(50,423 posts)Today's GOP in nutshell.
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)
Casino Capitalism
1986, in one of its earliest deals, Bain Capital acquired Accuride Corp., a manufacturer of aluminum truck wheels. The purchase was 97.5 percent financed by debt, a high level of leverage under any circumstances. It was especially burdensome for a company that was exposed to aluminum-price volatility and cyclical automotive production......Forty-to-one leverage is casino capitalism that hugely magnifies gains and losses. Bain Capital wisely chose to flip the company fast: After 18 months, it sold Accuride, converting its $2.6 million sliver of equity into a $61 million capital gain. That deal, which yielded a 1,123 percent annualized return, was critical to Bain Capitals early success and led the firm to keep maximizing the use of leverage.
In 1992, Bain Capital bought American Pad & Paper by financing 87 percent of the purchase price. In the next three years, Ampad borrowed to make acquisitions, repay existing debt and pay Bain Capital and its investors $60 million in dividends.....As a result, the companys debt swelled from $11 million in 1993 to $444 million by 1995. The $14 million in annual interest expense on this debt dwarfed the companys $4.7 million operating cash flow. The proceeds of an initial public offering in July 1996 were used to pay Bain Capital $48 million for part of its stake and to reduce the companys debt to $270 million.......From 1993 to 1999, Bain Capital charged Ampad about $18 million in various fees. By 1999, the companys debt was back up to $400 million. Unable to pay the interest costs and drained of cash paid to Bain Capital in fees and dividends, Ampad filed for bankruptcy the following year. Senior secured lenders got less than 50 cents on the dollar, unsecured lenders received two- tenths of a cent on the dollar, and several hundred jobs were lost. Bain Capital had reaped capital gains of $107 million on its $5.1 million investment.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-15/romney-s-bain-yielded-private-gains-socialized-losses.html
The American people need to know the Romney/Bain formula for privatizing profits and socializing the losses:
1. Get a controlling interest
2. Sell enough bonds to issue yourself a dividend large enough to recoup your initial investment, as well as outlandish annual consulting fees
3. Underfund pension plans
4. Get out before the shit hits the fan
5. Have the taxpayers (through the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pension_Benefit_Guaranty_Corporation , etc) clean up the mess
elleng
(130,974 posts)because he knows how ?economies? businesses work, so he should be asked: OK, What, exactly, would you do, and exactly how would it work? To promote/create jobs? IN the U.S?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)It's win-win for them and lose-lose for us.
GreenMask
(48 posts)Wait, didn't we do this with Chevy and Chrysler?
mitty is a felon.