Trump vows to restore travel ban suspended by federal judge
Source: BBC
US President Donald Trump has vowed to overturn a legal ruling which suspended his ban on travellers from seven mainly Muslim states.
He described federal judge James Robart as a "so-called" justice whose "ridiculous" opinion "essentially takes law-enforcement away from" the US.
Judge Robart ruled that the prohibition was unconstitutional.
Several airlines have said they are allowing nationals targeted by the ban to board flights to America.
"The opinion of this so-called judge, which The US administration argues that his executive order last week, which caused confusion and anger, is designed to protect the US.
The ban's implementation was halted with immediate effect by Judge Robart's ruling in Seattle.
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38868571
Trump needs to be impeached. He is a danger to the United States, and to the world
lark
(23,099 posts)He's not threatening a constitutional showdown so far. Guess he thinks he'll be upheld by SCOTUS, but I since this doesn't involve big business rights, Kennedy could easily come down onthe correct side and keep the ban in place.
still_one
(92,190 posts)shit the executive branch is doing. He is disparaging the Judicial Branch. I really think he believes he has dictatorial power. He has no understanding of our government, or the separation of powers.
Igel
(35,300 posts)Nor is disparaging the executive.
It's not the branches of government that are at issue. It's the personalities. Which we have to recast as larger issues involving the branches, not the people, because otherwise it sounds truly petty.
The problem isn't the disparagement, but who's doing it. We have no trouble dissing whatever branch we don't like, and that's fine; but if others disparage the branch we do like, that's reprehensible and traitorous. It boils down to "me good, you bad; me smart, you stupid; me virtuous, you immoral; me patriotic, you traitor." In rather stark, absolutist terms that flip-flop issue by issue.
Obama says horrible things about the legislative, red meat for the believers. His administration talks about needing to redo SCOTUS (presumably, the entailment is, because it's currently wrong-headed) and we cheer--but notice, that's disparagement of the judicial branch. A SCOTUS member even suggests bad things about Obama, we're out for blood, but if one suggests bad things about Bush it's atrocious.
Give no respect, get no respect, get pissed off because you got no respect ... leading to giving abuse instead of respect, getting abuse, and getting even more pissed off. We're all playing at being the smallest men (or self-actualizing individual H. sapiens ) possible.
still_one
(92,190 posts)drray23
(7,627 posts)They will not want to let the executive branch walk over the judicial branch.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)Pretty seriously (I'll give him credit where its due) and the man isn't likely to lose a pissing contest in his own house, if it comes to that.
randome
(34,845 posts)No respect, no knowledge of how the world works. Donald Trump, you are an embarrassment to the world.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Meredith McIver approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]
riversedge
(70,214 posts)HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)It drives him crazy, I'll bet.
lastlib
(23,226 posts)Somebody on Twitter needs to start a #socalledpresident hashtag!
I may start referring to him that way.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)precursing the latest empty threats, promises to be broken, lying pledges, and ersatz lofty goals coming from orange hitler.
Sounds 'powerful' and 'presidential', though.
Those guys are so full of bovine manure that they should open a drumpf-brand fertilizer subsidiary.
lark
(23,099 posts)It's called the Republican party, or as I call them the repugs.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Augiedog
(2,546 posts)RePUBES is my choice.
joshdawg
(2,648 posts)Definitely regressives.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Stock value is sure to be on the upswing, with the huge boom in inventory generation they're exhibiting.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)dummy who issued the poorly worded EO? Who are now being considered by legal class, proving how utterly dumb it all was, not clever at all.
Marthe48
(16,950 posts)n/t
pamdb
(1,332 posts)He is not a "so-called judge" you man child pussy grabber, he IS a judge.
mopinko
(70,101 posts)before he gets us into a shootin war.
WhiteTara
(29,710 posts)With another EO? Or take it to SCOTUS? Right now, it wouldn't hold up, but with Goresuck, it could.
still_one
(92,190 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,158 posts)NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)Republicans NEED to impeach him before he gets all butt hurt and drops a nuke on California or something.
orangecrush
(19,549 posts)manicraven
(901 posts)Our state is fighting bacK! Washington is first state to sue Trump over immigration order, and the federal judge who halted the Muslim ban is from Seattle and even a George Bush appointee.
The Constitution prevailed today, Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson said in a statement after the ruling. No one is above the law not even the President.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/317884-washington-state-judge-halts-trump-immigration-ban-nationwide
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-washington-state-lawsuit-trump-travel-ban-20170130-story.html
Super proud of my state right now!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)Is a perp walk with his wrists handcuffed too much to ask?
MFM008
(19,808 posts)Is not used to being told "no".
Get used to it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and State to carry it out, and they are under him as executive branch.
It is a constitutional crisis for him to deny the other branch has its power.