Donald Trump will not be allowed to address Parliament on UK state visit, Speaker says
Source: The Independent
MPs broke into spontaneous applause as the Speaker said he would not permit Westminster Hall to be used
Donald Trump will be blocked from addressing Parliament on his state visit to the UK, the Speaker of the House of Commons has said.
John Bercow, the Speaker, said he was "strongly opposed" to Mr Trump speaking in the Commons and that being invited was "not an automatic right" but "an earned honour".
In a dramatic intervention cited the Commons' opposition to "racism and to sexism and our support for equality before the law and an independent judiciary" as his reasons.
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/donald-trump-uk-state-visit-speaker-address-parliament-a7565651.html
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)They wouldn't allow that embarrassment.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Why? Because its clear he suffers from extreme delusions and in the fantasy world in his mind the people are being denied the ability to show their adoration of him because of a handful of "haters".
C Moon
(12,213 posts)Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)rally - BUT, the principle involved here, the unmitigated level of complete rejection by Parliament?? Oh yeah. And I mean YEAH baby YEAH!!
I'm so tickled!!
Glamrock
(11,800 posts)him down. But Jesus, man! Our closest ally breaking into cheers that they won't have to listen to him? I never thought I'd see the day. What a horrible, horrible development for our country. Even if we're able to remove him from office, the stain left by this amateur will remain for quite some time.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Is them asking why America let ignorant rural yahoos choose a president no one wants.
I don't have a good answer.
Glamrock
(11,800 posts)Reagan did away with the fairness doctrine, opening the door to FOX news on tv and Rush Limbaugh and all of his mimics on AM radio. Clinton signed the Telecom Deregulation Act, opening the door to media consolidation. That is the #1 reason we're in the mess we are in. Basically, Reagan legalized propaganda, and Clinton facilitated the media being owned by the very few. Consequently the American electorate, by and large, is less than informed. And, democracy cannot be sustained without an informed electorate. Those are the two main reasons. Add in the internet, which has no regulations regarding truth or what can be labeled as news.
That would be my answer. Hope that helps.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)But I agree that media consolidation is very dangerous.
What's scary now is not that people are uninformed so much as they are misinformed and convinced they've seen the truth right in front of them.
Glamrock
(11,800 posts)but it did make a diff with a.m. radio, which speaks directly to what you said about the misinformed.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)I can only imagine.
irisblue
(32,974 posts)calimary
(81,265 posts)Actually, I'd expect him to be VERY unhappy, and take it as a personal affront, and start tweeting about how horrible those Parliament people are. I'd expect him to be insulted. Just another reason to go on the attack.
Botany
(70,504 posts)Last edited Thu Feb 9, 2017, 07:30 PM - Edit history (1)
demosincebirth
(12,537 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)She has long stood for grace and decorum and to have this Vulgarian pay a visit would require a thorough disinfecting of the royal palace after he leaves.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)from meeting the Queen was actually pretty moving, basically "her majesty's personal dignity is the dignity of all of the Commonwealth, and I will not allow a man who has shown such shocking misogyny to insult the dignity of all of the Commonwealth."
Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)and she may make that known privately, but she'll do what the Foreign Office wants, if they insist.
This development makes a Trump official visit of any sort less likely anyway!
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)so she will have a good excuse for not meeting him. The Foreign Office will not push this.
Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)EllieBC
(3,014 posts)to be followed when interacting with the monarchy and no way would the Cheeto in Chief follow it because he thinks he's better than all that. And his base of deplorables would love him being rude and refusing to follow protocol and etiquette when meeting HRM.
onetexan
(13,041 posts)so who invited the idiot to have an audience with the queen then?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)though she tried to put the blame on a Foreign Office committee.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)He has to be an MP, but he doesn't generally vote or debate (if there is a tie, the speaker resolves it, but by tradition will always vote for whichever option either extends debate or preserves current law). It's sort of closer to the Clerk or Doorkeeper of the US House than our Speaker; he's in charge of the day to day administration of the House. So while May, as chief of government, can invite Trump to the UK, the Speaker is in charge of if he gets to speak to Parliament or not.
(This is further complicated by the fact that the US President is both Chief of Government -- analogous to PM May -- and Head of State -- analogous to the Queen. So by protocol the Queen asking him is a State Visit while the PM asking him is a government meeting.)
mdbl
(4,973 posts)Who would have thought!
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)The Donald won't like this.
monmouth4
(9,705 posts)received speech he gave. How I miss him. Donny boy, never, ever, gonna happen for you, none of it.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I had my disagreements with Obama, but he had the "be Presidential" thing down better than anybody in history, IMO. And that is actually important.
Botany
(70,504 posts)charlyvi
(6,537 posts)as he welcomed President Obama to the Canadian parliament. Could you imagine Trump displaying the same graciousness by honoring Canadian statesmen, through their words, at a joint session of Congress to honor Trudeau? It would be ME ME ME continuously. To quote the ghost in Hamlet...Oh what a falling off was there! We've gone from a dignified statesman to a class clown.
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)monmouth4
(9,705 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)we need him. But then again he was right to point out in his last speech we may loose democracy.
avebury
(10,952 posts)clip with the words - This is the way a true leader speaks to our allies.
IcyPeas
(21,871 posts)mobeau69
(11,144 posts)I love seeing the utter joy and appreciation in the eyes of John Bercow and Baroness Hayman.
Obama: He came, he spoke, he conquered Westminster - The Independent
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)sdfernando
(4,935 posts)because he is so stupid, he thinks this means he won't meet the Queen.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Hope he doesn't decide to drop a bomb on them.
ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)He's got the worst karma ever-- and deservedly so
avebury
(10,952 posts)regard for an independent judiciary.
Take that tRump!.
W Mousie
(22 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)His politics may not be mine on a number of issues, but he's been a pretty damn good Speaker of the House.
His standing on principle like this is an amazing turn of events.
He isn't on Twitter - beware, there's a fake unticked account - so Trump won't be able to unleash his flying monkeys on him on there at least.
red dog 1
(27,802 posts)K&R
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)...defend such an invite for their racist and sexist soul mate.
avebury
(10,952 posts)only President to be asked to address Parliament. That has got to burn Trump.
But you know, if Trump is going to run roughshod over all of the our allies he should not be surprised then they give him the cut direct. He better get used it.
Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)But Obama was the first US President to address both Houses (the Commons and the Lords), which may be where the confusion arises: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/may/25/head-state-addressing-uk-parliament
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)It was " President Obama ... is the only President to be asked to address Parliament".
See the link above for clarification.
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)It is considered a rare privilege for a foreign leader to be allowed to address both houses in Westminster Hall. Since the Second World War the only leaders to have done so have been French president Charles de Gaulle in 1960, South African president Nelson Mandela in 1996, Pope Benedict XVI in 2010, U.S. president Barack Obama in 2011 and Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi in 2012.[132][133][134] President Obama was the first ever US President to be allowed to use the Hall for an address to Parliament[135] and Aung San Suu Kyi was the first non-head of state to be given the accolade of addressing MPs and peers in Westminster Hall.
Denzil_DC
(7,241 posts)on Trump. That's why the unprecedentedly early (and possibly not even officially cleared) flattering offer of a state visit was made by her in the first place.
She's a weak prime minister in a very weak position, and currently rattled by turns of events. I can't imagine an inducement she wouldn't offer if she thought it would help bail her out in terms of future trade deals at the moment.
There's at least two ways you could look at this: (a) Bercow (elected as an MP, but as Speaker able by convention to stand unopposed in his seat, and supposed to serve the House beyond the demands of party politics - the Speaker gets voted in by the House at the opening of each Parliament, but he has cross-party support, probably as long as he wants the job) could have cooked this up with May's approval to give her cover for the invite being canceled or modified; (b) it's a genuine, principled stand by Bercow (quite possible on his past form), which is meeting with wide approval, as nobody in Parliament (let alone the country) beyond the terminally deranged wants to be subjected to Trump rambling on about his current obsessions and using the esteemed platform to potentially inflame things further.
From other coverage, it sounds like Trump, despite his vast ego, wasn't wild about the prospect of having to address Parliament anyway (maybe even he realizes what a ridiculous spectacle he'd make of himself in those surroundings, not least the stark contrast with Obama), so it may not be such a biggie, but we'll see how hot Twitter gets, I guess.
There are conceivably other venues that could be used for such an address that Bercow would have no say in (he's acknowledged this himself), but yes, Westminster Hall is hallowed ground as far as Parliament's concerned.
TygrBright
(20,760 posts)Maybe he can pick up some gifts for family & staff at Harrods to make the trip worthwhile.
Or do a little tour of the Tower of London. Lots of interesting exhibits there about what happens when the ruling classes squabble like pre-schoolers over who gets the power and swag.
helpfully,
Bright
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)drumpf can still speak to both houses of Parliament (to date) BUT he cannot speak to them in Westminster Hall. Bercow has control (1/3) of the Hall. The other questions, as he noted in the little video, are "above my pay grade". I think he was being a little satirical. Westminster Hall is a sacred place to the UK. It be like having Charlie Manson give a talk in the Sistine Chapel.
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)the video of Bercow does not jibe with the article. Maybe it was decided no speech at all after the decision was made about W Hall. Very screwed up article IMO.
avebury
(10,952 posts)Parliament (even if it is not in White Hall). He is too much of a loose canon and so much of what Trump rants and raves is toally contrary to the beliefs of the British. On the other hand, there is no doubt that he would end up humiliating himself.
If it were not for Brexit, May would not be kowtowing to him. She is between a rock and a hard place.
It will be interesting to see how Trump is treated at any group meetings (G8 and so on). I don't think that anybody will take him very seriously. I think that all the really serious discussions will take place when he is not around. He may very will find himself left out in the cold.
MontanaMama
(23,314 posts)He won't be invited anywhere for anything...unless there's a subpoena involved.
These words to God's ears.
edbermac
(15,939 posts)manicraven
(901 posts)spooky3
(34,452 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,788 posts)For good measure, Her Majesty should give him a piece of her mind, preferably in public.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)I was really getting concerned during the election when Trump kept asserting that the rest of the world no longer respects us. It's good to see that is now changing....oh, wait... Remember when it really wasn't safe for Dubya and Cheney to travel to other countries? When will Republican voters begin to get a clue as to how most of the world sees their policies? For now it looks as if we still have Russia.
rurallib
(62,415 posts)Vladie will make sure you canspeak in front of their parliament
bdamomma
(63,849 posts)tRump has to go.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)he is the very definition of "the ugly american".
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Looking into that, led me to, among others, these two tidbits:
Donald Trump: The Ugly American
It is tempting to proclaim that Trump is very familiar to us because he embodies the worst things about Americans. However, these traits are apparent across the world.
Trump therefore is not merely an ugly American but is an amplification of commonplace cultural trends. Those that Trump exemplifies, such as narcissism, self-centredness, gnat-like attention spans, obsessive self-regard, preoccupation with the number of followers one has and a lack of interest in listening to others, are trends that are easy to pass off as particularly American.
But if we are honest, this behaviour is all around us. To prevent the next Trump - and there will be more - requires challenging the sources of selfishness in much of modern culture that are everywhere and seemingly on the rise.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)excellent book.
It should be required reading by every single American.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)President Bannon will be given unlimited time to address the body.
Paladin
(28,257 posts)Motley13
(3,867 posts)dchill
(38,492 posts)Plus, he would have sold about 1.5 million Trump Steaks! Without using all 77 words in his vocabulary.
Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)That would be Angela Merkel now, and I'd like to think that she's welcome there any time.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)which seems to have gone well.
Big_K
(237 posts)1. Australia - damn their president
2. Mexico - bad hombres
3. England, err, Britain, err, United Kingdom - I'll go to Westminster Cathedral instead. Just to walk on all those dead guys.
4. Irak? or is it I-ran? "Steve, which a-rab country you want me to invade?"
5. China - cause Steve "the grim reaper" Bannon says so.
Onyrleft
(344 posts)of George Clinton and Bootsy Collins albums.
orangecrush
(19,555 posts)joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)(direct link to image doesn't work, so you'll need to click)
Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Can you imagine *45 being jeered by Parliament? He'd blow an aneurysm, unless they were cheering for him... He has to bring a cheerleader squad with him...
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)moondust
(19,981 posts)Puzzler
(2,505 posts)... Trump is "toast" in the UK. Good!
-P