Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:33 PM Feb 2017

Donald Trump will not be allowed to address Parliament on UK state visit, Speaker says

Source: The Independent

MPs broke into spontaneous applause as the Speaker said he would not permit Westminster Hall to be used

Donald Trump will be blocked from addressing Parliament on his state visit to the UK, the Speaker of the House of Commons has said.

John Bercow, the Speaker, said he was "strongly opposed" to Mr Trump speaking in the Commons and that being invited was "not an automatic right" but "an earned honour".

In a dramatic intervention cited the Commons' opposition to "racism and to sexism and our support for equality before the law and an independent judiciary" as his reasons.

Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/donald-trump-uk-state-visit-speaker-address-parliament-a7565651.html

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trump will not be allowed to address Parliament on UK state visit, Speaker says (Original Post) Recursion Feb 2017 OP
No one is happier about that than Trump. Imagine him "speaking" before Parliament. nikibatts Feb 2017 #1
Actually Trump is probably unhappy and angry. cstanleytech Feb 2017 #4
He probably didn't want to, until they said he couldn't. C Moon Feb 2017 #26
Bingo. n/t VWolf Feb 2017 #53
Agreed - he can't "speak" anywhere comfortably unless it's at a DFT Leghorn21 Feb 2017 #7
I get where you're coming from. His rejection by our allies is one of several keys needed to take Glamrock Feb 2017 #27
What I hear from my friends overseas . . . MrModerate Feb 2017 #81
The answer is Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Glamrock Feb 2017 #82
I don't think the Fairness Doctrine had a hope of surviving the proliferation of cable channels. MrModerate Feb 2017 #84
Probably right, Glamrock Feb 2017 #85
I have watched Prime Ministers Questions. nycbos Feb 2017 #10
Me too. He would be such an embarrassment. irisblue Feb 2017 #36
Welcome to DU, nikibatts! calimary Feb 2017 #42
Boy that is going to make Red Don mad Botany Feb 2017 #2
A chameleon. demosincebirth Feb 2017 #37
When his face goes from orange to red.....look out LiberalLovinLug Feb 2017 #60
I can't imagine the Queen granting him an audience randr Feb 2017 #3
The only way to disinfect it if he did visit would be with some napalm. nt cstanleytech Feb 2017 #6
I normally kind of snicker at monarchists, but the guy in the House of Lords trying to stop him Recursion Feb 2017 #8
She may not be happy about it, Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #24
She's 90 years old and missed the Christmas cathedral services this year, Tanuki Feb 2017 #34
We'll see. n/t Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #35
It would be a disaster. There is a protocol EllieBC Feb 2017 #38
That's what puzzle me onetexan Feb 2017 #62
Theresa May, the Prime Minister, did muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #63
The Speaker of the House of Commons is a theoretically administrative role Recursion Feb 2017 #72
Vulgaria is the country Trump is from? mdbl Feb 2017 #80
Why do I feel a tweetstorm coming on? TheCowsCameHome Feb 2017 #5
I remember how warmly and graciously President Obama was greeted and that wonderful and well monmouth4 Feb 2017 #9
It was a great speech Recursion Feb 2017 #12
And don't forget about how much President Obama was loved in Canada too. Botany Feb 2017 #20
How gracious Trudeau was in quoting our various presidents charlyvi Feb 2017 #44
Bercow despises drumpf. Good Call. Anyway, here's how it's done: mobeau69 Feb 2017 #11
Thank you so much for this. So wonderful to hear him speechify again..n/t monmouth4 Feb 2017 #31
I miss him bdamomma Feb 2017 #47
People should start sending tRump this video avebury Feb 2017 #49
this is great. thanks for posting. /nt IcyPeas Feb 2017 #65
One of his very best speeches. mobeau69 Feb 2017 #71
Ha!! :-D NurseJackie Feb 2017 #13
He is such a snowflake that he may just cancel the trip sdfernando Feb 2017 #14
Hey, Donald: dalton99a Feb 2017 #15
What a slap in the face. pnwmom Feb 2017 #16
This is a splendid example of KARMA ailsagirl Feb 2017 #17
They didn't just block him due to the travel ban but because of their avebury Feb 2017 #18
Talk about the cut direct! n/t W Mousie Feb 2017 #19
Hats off to Bercow! Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #21
Jolly Good Show, Mr Speaker! red dog 1 Feb 2017 #22
Didn't Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage... TomCADem Feb 2017 #23
President Obama (according to the introduction) is the avebury Feb 2017 #25
No, Reagan and Clinton did it. Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #29
No, not in Westminster Hall n/t mobeau69 Feb 2017 #32
That wasn't the issue. Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #33
I see. There was no way drumph would be allowed to speak in Westminster Hall. mobeau69 Feb 2017 #48
Theresa May is absolutely desperate to nullify Nigel Farage's influence Denzil_DC Feb 2017 #58
No address to Parliament, no Royal audience. TygrBright Feb 2017 #28
The article is messed up. No wonder there are conflicting posts here. mobeau69 Feb 2017 #52
I reread it again and it's still not clear! mobeau69 Feb 2017 #57
I would be shocked if Trump was invited to speak to the members of avebury Feb 2017 #76
Drum of can't speak in complete sentences! MontanaMama Feb 2017 #77
Bugger off Donald edbermac Feb 2017 #30
Awesome! manicraven Feb 2017 #39
Thank you, Mr. Bercow. spooky3 Feb 2017 #40
Hear, hear! DinahMoeHum Feb 2017 #41
What a relief! maddiemom Feb 2017 #43
Well, Donnie, there is always Russia rurallib Feb 2017 #45
oh oh another ally he is going to piss off. bdamomma Feb 2017 #46
knowing the orange menace, he'll probably ask if he can try on one of the crowns. Javaman Feb 2017 #50
The Ugly American reference made me wonder about the origin of the phrase. Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2017 #68
There is also this.. Javaman Feb 2017 #74
That privlidge is reserved. tazkcmo Feb 2017 #51
Outstanding! Thank you, Mr. Speaker. (nt) Paladin Feb 2017 #54
They didn't want to hear about his Apprentice ratings Motley13 Feb 2017 #55
Too bad. He would have done an AMAZING JOB!!! dchill Feb 2017 #56
Simply put: He is NOT the leader of the free world. Never was. Never will be. Fritz Walter Feb 2017 #59
She addressed the British Parliament 3 years ago muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #61
Okay, what's the war order now? Big_K Feb 2017 #64
How long will it take Cheeto Benito's Twitter puppets to start a boycott... Onyrleft Feb 2017 #66
Hey, Trump... orangecrush Feb 2017 #67
Very embarrassing for a normal politician, but not Trump. joanbarnes Feb 2017 #69
Steve Bell: muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #70
May will let him if he actually wants to Wabbajack_ Feb 2017 #73
They would eat him alive... Thor_MN Feb 2017 #75
UK shouldn't let him in, he'll help putin destablise,any relationship left with putins hated EU. Sunlei Feb 2017 #78
Twitty McTwitface ain't gonna like that. moondust Feb 2017 #79
This is just the beginning... Puzzler Feb 2017 #83
 

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)
1. No one is happier about that than Trump. Imagine him "speaking" before Parliament.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:34 PM
Feb 2017

They wouldn't allow that embarrassment.

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
4. Actually Trump is probably unhappy and angry.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:40 PM
Feb 2017

Why? Because its clear he suffers from extreme delusions and in the fantasy world in his mind the people are being denied the ability to show their adoration of him because of a handful of "haters".

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
7. Agreed - he can't "speak" anywhere comfortably unless it's at a DFT
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:42 PM
Feb 2017

rally - BUT, the principle involved here, the unmitigated level of complete rejection by Parliament?? Oh yeah. And I mean YEAH baby YEAH!!

I'm so tickled!!

Glamrock

(11,800 posts)
27. I get where you're coming from. His rejection by our allies is one of several keys needed to take
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:12 PM
Feb 2017

him down. But Jesus, man! Our closest ally breaking into cheers that they won't have to listen to him? I never thought I'd see the day. What a horrible, horrible development for our country. Even if we're able to remove him from office, the stain left by this amateur will remain for quite some time.

 

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)
81. What I hear from my friends overseas . . .
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 10:02 AM
Feb 2017

Is them asking why America let ignorant rural yahoos choose a president no one wants.

I don't have a good answer.

Glamrock

(11,800 posts)
82. The answer is Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 10:55 AM
Feb 2017

Reagan did away with the fairness doctrine, opening the door to FOX news on tv and Rush Limbaugh and all of his mimics on AM radio. Clinton signed the Telecom Deregulation Act, opening the door to media consolidation. That is the #1 reason we're in the mess we are in. Basically, Reagan legalized propaganda, and Clinton facilitated the media being owned by the very few. Consequently the American electorate, by and large, is less than informed. And, democracy cannot be sustained without an informed electorate. Those are the two main reasons. Add in the internet, which has no regulations regarding truth or what can be labeled as news.

That would be my answer. Hope that helps.

 

MrModerate

(9,753 posts)
84. I don't think the Fairness Doctrine had a hope of surviving the proliferation of cable channels.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 10:45 PM
Feb 2017

But I agree that media consolidation is very dangerous.

What's scary now is not that people are uninformed so much as they are misinformed — and convinced they've seen the truth right in front of them.

Glamrock

(11,800 posts)
85. Probably right,
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 10:47 PM
Feb 2017

but it did make a diff with a.m. radio, which speaks directly to what you said about the misinformed.

calimary

(81,265 posts)
42. Welcome to DU, nikibatts!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:50 PM
Feb 2017

Actually, I'd expect him to be VERY unhappy, and take it as a personal affront, and start tweeting about how horrible those Parliament people are. I'd expect him to be insulted. Just another reason to go on the attack.

randr

(12,412 posts)
3. I can't imagine the Queen granting him an audience
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:40 PM
Feb 2017

She has long stood for grace and decorum and to have this Vulgarian pay a visit would require a thorough disinfecting of the royal palace after he leaves.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. I normally kind of snicker at monarchists, but the guy in the House of Lords trying to stop him
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:43 PM
Feb 2017

from meeting the Queen was actually pretty moving, basically "her majesty's personal dignity is the dignity of all of the Commonwealth, and I will not allow a man who has shown such shocking misogyny to insult the dignity of all of the Commonwealth."

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
24. She may not be happy about it,
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:10 PM
Feb 2017

and she may make that known privately, but she'll do what the Foreign Office wants, if they insist.

This development makes a Trump official visit of any sort less likely anyway!

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
34. She's 90 years old and missed the Christmas cathedral services this year,
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:35 PM
Feb 2017

so she will have a good excuse for not meeting him. The Foreign Office will not push this.

EllieBC

(3,014 posts)
38. It would be a disaster. There is a protocol
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:37 PM
Feb 2017

to be followed when interacting with the monarchy and no way would the Cheeto in Chief follow it because he thinks he's better than all that. And his base of deplorables would love him being rude and refusing to follow protocol and etiquette when meeting HRM.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
72. The Speaker of the House of Commons is a theoretically administrative role
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:37 PM
Feb 2017

He has to be an MP, but he doesn't generally vote or debate (if there is a tie, the speaker resolves it, but by tradition will always vote for whichever option either extends debate or preserves current law). It's sort of closer to the Clerk or Doorkeeper of the US House than our Speaker; he's in charge of the day to day administration of the House. So while May, as chief of government, can invite Trump to the UK, the Speaker is in charge of if he gets to speak to Parliament or not.

(This is further complicated by the fact that the US President is both Chief of Government -- analogous to PM May -- and Head of State -- analogous to the Queen. So by protocol the Queen asking him is a State Visit while the PM asking him is a government meeting.)

monmouth4

(9,705 posts)
9. I remember how warmly and graciously President Obama was greeted and that wonderful and well
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:43 PM
Feb 2017

received speech he gave. How I miss him. Donny boy, never, ever, gonna happen for you, none of it.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. It was a great speech
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:48 PM
Feb 2017

I had my disagreements with Obama, but he had the "be Presidential" thing down better than anybody in history, IMO. And that is actually important.

charlyvi

(6,537 posts)
44. How gracious Trudeau was in quoting our various presidents
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:56 PM
Feb 2017

as he welcomed President Obama to the Canadian parliament. Could you imagine Trump displaying the same graciousness by honoring Canadian statesmen, through their words, at a joint session of Congress to honor Trudeau? It would be ME ME ME continuously. To quote the ghost in Hamlet...Oh what a falling off was there! We've gone from a dignified statesman to a class clown.

bdamomma

(63,849 posts)
47. I miss him
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:01 PM
Feb 2017

we need him. But then again he was right to point out in his last speech we may loose democracy.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
49. People should start sending tRump this video
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:08 PM
Feb 2017

clip with the words - This is the way a true leader speaks to our allies.

mobeau69

(11,144 posts)
71. One of his very best speeches.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 09:30 PM
Feb 2017

I love seeing the utter joy and appreciation in the eyes of John Bercow and Baroness Hayman.

Obama: He came, he spoke, he conquered Westminster - The Independent



sdfernando

(4,935 posts)
14. He is such a snowflake that he may just cancel the trip
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 01:51 PM
Feb 2017

because he is so stupid, he thinks this means he won't meet the Queen.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
18. They didn't just block him due to the travel ban but because of their
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:03 PM
Feb 2017

regard for an independent judiciary.

Take that tRump!.

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
21. Hats off to Bercow!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:07 PM
Feb 2017

His politics may not be mine on a number of issues, but he's been a pretty damn good Speaker of the House.

His standing on principle like this is an amazing turn of events.

He isn't on Twitter - beware, there's a fake unticked account - so Trump won't be able to unleash his flying monkeys on him on there at least.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
23. Didn't Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage...
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:09 PM
Feb 2017

...defend such an invite for their racist and sexist soul mate.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
25. President Obama (according to the introduction) is the
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:10 PM
Feb 2017

only President to be asked to address Parliament. That has got to burn Trump.

But you know, if Trump is going to run roughshod over all of the our allies he should not be surprised then they give him the cut direct. He better get used it.

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
29. No, Reagan and Clinton did it.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:19 PM
Feb 2017

But Obama was the first US President to address both Houses (the Commons and the Lords), which may be where the confusion arises: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/may/25/head-state-addressing-uk-parliament

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
33. That wasn't the issue.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:30 PM
Feb 2017

It was " President Obama ... is the only President to be asked to address Parliament".

See the link above for clarification.

mobeau69

(11,144 posts)
48. I see. There was no way drumph would be allowed to speak in Westminster Hall.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:04 PM
Feb 2017

It is considered a rare privilege for a foreign leader to be allowed to address both houses in Westminster Hall. Since the Second World War the only leaders to have done so have been French president Charles de Gaulle in 1960, South African president Nelson Mandela in 1996, Pope Benedict XVI in 2010, U.S. president Barack Obama in 2011 and Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi in 2012.[132][133][134] President Obama was the first ever US President to be allowed to use the Hall for an address to Parliament[135] and Aung San Suu Kyi was the first non-head of state to be given the accolade of addressing MPs and peers in Westminster Hall.

Denzil_DC

(7,241 posts)
58. Theresa May is absolutely desperate to nullify Nigel Farage's influence
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:38 PM
Feb 2017

on Trump. That's why the unprecedentedly early (and possibly not even officially cleared) flattering offer of a state visit was made by her in the first place.

She's a weak prime minister in a very weak position, and currently rattled by turns of events. I can't imagine an inducement she wouldn't offer if she thought it would help bail her out in terms of future trade deals at the moment.

There's at least two ways you could look at this: (a) Bercow (elected as an MP, but as Speaker able by convention to stand unopposed in his seat, and supposed to serve the House beyond the demands of party politics - the Speaker gets voted in by the House at the opening of each Parliament, but he has cross-party support, probably as long as he wants the job) could have cooked this up with May's approval to give her cover for the invite being canceled or modified; (b) it's a genuine, principled stand by Bercow (quite possible on his past form), which is meeting with wide approval, as nobody in Parliament (let alone the country) beyond the terminally deranged wants to be subjected to Trump rambling on about his current obsessions and using the esteemed platform to potentially inflame things further.

From other coverage, it sounds like Trump, despite his vast ego, wasn't wild about the prospect of having to address Parliament anyway (maybe even he realizes what a ridiculous spectacle he'd make of himself in those surroundings, not least the stark contrast with Obama), so it may not be such a biggie, but we'll see how hot Twitter gets, I guess.

There are conceivably other venues that could be used for such an address that Bercow would have no say in (he's acknowledged this himself), but yes, Westminster Hall is hallowed ground as far as Parliament's concerned.

TygrBright

(20,760 posts)
28. No address to Parliament, no Royal audience.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:16 PM
Feb 2017

Maybe he can pick up some gifts for family & staff at Harrods to make the trip worthwhile.

Or do a little tour of the Tower of London. Lots of interesting exhibits there about what happens when the ruling classes squabble like pre-schoolers over who gets the power and swag.

helpfully,
Bright

mobeau69

(11,144 posts)
52. The article is messed up. No wonder there are conflicting posts here.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:20 PM
Feb 2017

drumpf can still speak to both houses of Parliament (to date) BUT he cannot speak to them in Westminster Hall. Bercow has control (1/3) of the Hall. The other questions, as he noted in the little video, are "above my pay grade". I think he was being a little satirical. Westminster Hall is a sacred place to the UK. It be like having Charlie Manson give a talk in the Sistine Chapel.

mobeau69

(11,144 posts)
57. I reread it again and it's still not clear!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:32 PM
Feb 2017

the video of Bercow does not jibe with the article. Maybe it was decided no speech at all after the decision was made about W Hall. Very screwed up article IMO.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
76. I would be shocked if Trump was invited to speak to the members of
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:33 PM
Feb 2017

Parliament (even if it is not in White Hall). He is too much of a loose canon and so much of what Trump rants and raves is toally contrary to the beliefs of the British. On the other hand, there is no doubt that he would end up humiliating himself.

If it were not for Brexit, May would not be kowtowing to him. She is between a rock and a hard place.

It will be interesting to see how Trump is treated at any group meetings (G8 and so on). I don't think that anybody will take him very seriously. I think that all the really serious discussions will take place when he is not around. He may very will find himself left out in the cold.

MontanaMama

(23,314 posts)
77. Drum of can't speak in complete sentences!
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 01:18 AM
Feb 2017

He won't be invited anywhere for anything...unless there's a subpoena involved.

These words to God's ears.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
43. What a relief!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 02:55 PM
Feb 2017

I was really getting concerned during the election when Trump kept asserting that the rest of the world no longer respects us. It's good to see that is now changing....oh, wait... Remember when it really wasn't safe for Dubya and Cheney to travel to other countries? When will Republican voters begin to get a clue as to how most of the world sees their policies? For now it looks as if we still have Russia.

Javaman

(62,530 posts)
50. knowing the orange menace, he'll probably ask if he can try on one of the crowns.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:13 PM
Feb 2017

he is the very definition of "the ugly american".

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
68. The Ugly American reference made me wonder about the origin of the phrase.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 08:06 PM
Feb 2017

Looking into that, led me to, among others, these two tidbits:

Donald Trump: The Ugly American

That evening in May 1993, Vanity Fair had two tables and we filled them with the likes of Christopher Hitchens, Bob Shrum, Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg, Peggy Noonan, Tipper Gore, and Vendela Kirsebom, a Swedish model who professionally went by her first name and who was then at or near the top of the catwalk heap. I sat Trump beside Vendela, thinking that she would get a kick out of him. This was not the case. After 45 minutes she came over to my table, almost in tears, and pleaded with me to move her. It seems that Trump had spent his entire time with her assaying the “tits” and legs of the other female guests and asking how they measured up to those of other women, including his wife. “He is,” she told me, in words that seemed familiar, “the most vulgar man I have ever met.”


At one point we sent checks for $1.11 out to 58 of the “well-known” and “well-heeled” to see who would take the time to endorse and deposit the checks from a firm we called the National Refund Clearinghouse. The ones who deposited the $1.11 checks were sent 64-cent checks, and the ones who deposited those were sent checks for 13 cents. This being in the days before electronic deposits and such, the exercise took the better part of a year. At the end, only two 13-cent checks were signed—and we couldn’t believe our good fortune. One was signed by arms trader Adnan Khashoggi. The other was deposited by Donald Trump.


There Are 6 Types of 'Ugly American'—and Donald Trump Is All of Them

It is tempting to proclaim that Trump is very familiar to us because he embodies the worst things about Americans. However, these traits are apparent across the world.

Trump therefore is not merely an “ugly American” but is an amplification of commonplace cultural trends. Those that Trump exemplifies, such as narcissism, self-centredness, gnat-like attention spans, obsessive self-regard, preoccupation with the number of followers one has and a lack of interest in listening to others, are trends that are easy to pass off as particularly “American”.

But if we are honest, this behaviour is all around us. To prevent the next Trump - and there will be more - requires challenging the sources of selfishness in much of modern culture that are everywhere and seemingly on the rise.
Yeah, but let's start with him, as he's the poster boy.

dchill

(38,492 posts)
56. Too bad. He would have done an AMAZING JOB!!!
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:27 PM
Feb 2017

Plus, he would have sold about 1.5 million Trump Steaks! Without using all 77 words in his vocabulary.

Fritz Walter

(4,291 posts)
59. Simply put: He is NOT the leader of the free world. Never was. Never will be.
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 03:57 PM
Feb 2017

That would be Angela Merkel now, and I'd like to think that she's welcome there any time.

Big_K

(237 posts)
64. Okay, what's the war order now?
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 07:04 PM
Feb 2017

1. Australia - damn their president
2. Mexico - bad hombres
3. England, err, Britain, err, United Kingdom - I'll go to Westminster Cathedral instead. Just to walk on all those dead guys.
4. Irak? or is it I-ran? "Steve, which a-rab country you want me to invade?"
5. China - cause Steve "the grim reaper" Bannon says so.

Onyrleft

(344 posts)
66. How long will it take Cheeto Benito's Twitter puppets to start a boycott...
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 08:04 PM
Feb 2017

of George Clinton and Bootsy Collins albums.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
75. They would eat him alive...
Mon Feb 6, 2017, 11:17 PM
Feb 2017

Can you imagine *45 being jeered by Parliament? He'd blow an aneurysm, unless they were cheering for him... He has to bring a cheerleader squad with him...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Donald Trump will not be ...