Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 12:49 PM Feb 2017

Trump administration officials may be deposed over immigration order

Source: Reuters



Sun Feb 12, 2017 | 10:33am EST

By Julia Harte | WASHINGTON
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said on Sunday he will depose Trump administration officials to uncover “what truly motivated” President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration if the case he brought against it goes to trial.

Documents and emails authored by administration officials may contain evidence that the order was an unconstitutional attempt to ban Muslims from entering the United States, and Ferguson will use "every tool" at his disposal to bring those to light, he told ABC's "This Week."

###


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-lawsuit-idUSKBN15R0Q6?il=0

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
1. This is how Watergate got real legs
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 12:54 PM
Feb 2017

When Ulasewicz revealed the bags of money being dropped off in phone booths. And Buttefield revealed the existence of the tapes.

You never know what will come out in depositions given under oath.

CincyDem

(6,355 posts)
3. That was amazing history to watch live.
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 01:06 PM
Feb 2017

IIRC, it was John Dean who speculated about the existence of tapes. From then on they asked every witness. Butterfield was a jackpot.

And the guy who asked the question - none other than Fred Thompson of Law & Order (and Die Hard 2) fame. Fun actor - crapchit politician.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
11. I was in college and everyone was watching the hearings
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 02:33 PM
Feb 2017

I can remember hurrying back to the dorm after class to tune in the hearings. Pretty much everyone was tuned in to them. This was back when there wasn't any cable, internet or social media, just the 3 major networks and PBS.

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
7. Many have said the courts did not rule on the merits of the case--so proving it was uncontitutional
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 01:43 PM
Feb 2017

would be HUGE.

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
8. The Washington State attorney conceded tht he had no direct evidence of the motive behind the law
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 01:51 PM
Feb 2017

because they had had no opportunity for "discovery." They had to go on previous statements by Trump, Giuliani and others that they wanted a Muslim ban. Interviewing the players under oath, and searching their emails, will provide evidence that the order was unconstitutional. Bring it on!

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
10. Please video the depositions
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 02:09 PM
Feb 2017

for some real rabid, frothing at the mouth testimony that will impugn these idiots' sanity.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
12. Live TV, or at least audio, is a must
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 02:36 PM
Feb 2017

Think about how many people tuned into the live stream of the 9th circuit hearing, then imagine the audience for depositions and the trial! Talk about "must see TV".

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
18. I think this lawyer Ferguson is a crackerjack...an excellent lawyer!!
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 08:14 PM
Feb 2017

Washington is well-served by him, as are we all.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration offi...