Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 01:52 AM Feb 2017

Video shifts initial view of fatal Nashville police shooting

Source: Associated Press


Jonathan Mattise, Associated Press Updated 8:35 pm, Tuesday, February 14, 2017






NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Newly obtained surveillance video has caused Nashville police to revise their account of a traffic stop on Friday that ended with a white officer shooting and killing an armed African-American man.

Police say footage first made available Tuesday shows there was no initial physical confrontation between Jocques Scott Clemmons and Nashville Officer Josh Lippert right after Clemmons ran a stop sign and they both exited their cars.

Based on a different video, police first believed Clemmons "abruptly charged at Officer Lippert, making full contact with his body."

Instead, the latest video angle shows Clemmons ran toward Lippert to get around him, stopped short of the officer, and then turned around and ran in the opposite direction, police said.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Video-shifts-initial-view-of-fatal-Nashville-10932209.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Video shifts initial view of fatal Nashville police shooting (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2017 OP
Oh, right. Police 'first believed' ... in other words ... mr_lebowski Feb 2017 #1
Police brass are suckers if they simply believe anything their officers say. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #2
Any time a suspect is shot in the back, I'm suspicious Coventina Feb 2017 #3
No way around a simple fact angrychair Feb 2017 #4
I agree/understand everything in your post except yagotme Feb 2017 #5
I believe the previous poster meant actual control of your firearm NickB79 Feb 2017 #6
I couldn't tell. yagotme Feb 2017 #7
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
1. Oh, right. Police 'first believed' ... in other words ...
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:20 AM
Feb 2017

Lippert SAID that's what happened (wink wink) and there was one deceptive vid that *appeared* to back his story, so that's what the Brass went with ('thin blue line' and all).

But now that there's other video evidence out there, accurately showing the truth of the situation ... OOPS! That's just 'what they first believed'. Uh-huh. Got it.

I'm sure if the other video had never appeared, they would've been SURE to straighten out the actual truth of the situation. Just needed to give them 'time to investigate', don't you know?

angrychair

(8,698 posts)
4. No way around a simple fact
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:12 AM
Feb 2017

Police forces in a dozen different 1st world nations do not have these issues.
All of the police forces in Germany combined have less police shootings (not killings, just firing a gun in line of duty) in 10 years than police in Texas have in 2015.m

Better gun control and better trained and better equipped police are the only way to avoid this insanity.

yagotme

(2,919 posts)
5. I agree/understand everything in your post except
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 10:04 PM
Feb 2017

the "Better gun control" part. Gun control for police? Or national gun control? And how would that have affected this case?

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
6. I believe the previous poster meant actual control of your firearm
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 11:06 PM
Feb 2017

IE, better training to know when to shoot and when to use less lethal options, and possibly better accuracy training to fire to wound instead of center-mass to the chest.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Video shifts initial view...