Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 17 states
Source: washington post
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src&w480
By Christopher Ingraham February 24 at 11:37 AM
Since the election of President Trump, Republican lawmakers in at least 17 states have introduced or voted on legislation to curb mass protests in what civil liberties experts are calling an attack on protest rights throughout the states.
From Virginia to Washington state, legislators have introduced bills that would increase punishments for blocking highways, ban the use of masks during protests, indemnify drivers who strike protesters with their cars and, in at least once case, seize the assets of people involved in protests that later turn violent. The proposals come after a string of mass protest movements in the past few years, covering everything from police shootings of unarmed black men to the Dakota Access Pipeline to the inauguration of Trump.
Some are introducing bills because they say they're necessary to counter the actions of paid or professional protesters who set out to intimidate or disrupt, a common accusation that experts agree is largely overstated. You now have a situation where you have full-time, quasi-professional agent-provocateurs that attempt to create public disorder, said Republican state senator John Kavanagh of Arizona in support of a measure there that would bring racketeering charges against some protesters.
..............
Democrats in many of these states are fighting the legislation. They cite existing laws that already make it a crime to block traffic, the possibility of a chilling effect on protests across the political spectrum, and concerns for protesters safety in the face of aggressive motorists...........................
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/02/24/republican-lawmakers-introduce-bills-to-curb-protesting-in-at-least-17-states/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.3002a62c69ab
Next thing you know, some idiot GOPer will make a law to ban TownHalls!!
Link to tweet
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)I mean ... REALLY?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)Well, they already knocked off one of our freedoms - freedom of the press. If they go for 3, do they get one free?
Publish EVERY name, then let's vote them OUT. They are elected t represent us, not their orange blowhard "leader"
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)IF you protest they will be legally allowed to crack your head open. Welcome to the United Soviet States of Amerikka.. (Remember when Republicans made a big fuss over who was wearing an American flag pin? Not so much any more.. Now they can wave Russian flags)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028702130
NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)n/t.
lostnfound
(16,177 posts)How will they be able to stage burning trash cans and broken Starbucks windows if they can't hide their faces?
elmac
(4,642 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)Ligyron
(7,632 posts)Guess we'll have to fight this in court after someone is arrested.
Donate every spare dime to the ACLU folks.
Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)Be Damned. The Right is trying to trash the Constitution right in front of us. Between these attempts to quash free assembly and Trump's mangling the meaning of Freedom of the Press, they will go to no ends to silence us. It's an open admission that they know they're wrong, but don't won't to allow anyone to stand up and tell them so.
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)KewlKat
(5,624 posts)Will be working on.
hibbing
(10,098 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Really?
IdiotsforPalin
(170 posts)Just some Trump supporting Repuk who is wasting time and money. Inslee will never allow it.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)Time for another donation to ACLU.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)Vinca
(50,269 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)When you see these draconian laws suddenly appear in simultaneous states, it's like an Al-Qaeda... err... Al-ECa planned attack.
mopinko
(70,090 posts)they take their oaths of office?
this wouldnt piss me off half as much if the majority of them werent lawyers.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,762 posts)Fools, all the time we had to tolerate the tea party rags...they protested and no laws were put forward in the democratic held government. Just who do they think they are!???
Yes donating as much as I can to the ACLU. Did read just now that the new AZ law has to pass the house ,they seemed to think that was questionable. It that crazy gov out there will do anything, so he will sign it should it pass the house. The tail end of the article "the ACLU is watching this closely."
Makes my blood boil!
Lanius
(599 posts)For a group of people who act tough and talk tough, Republicans sure are wimps. Don't they feel safe with all those "good guys with guns" walking around?
JDC
(10,127 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)real hard-working Americans versus paid, professional leftists.
Reality has nothing to do with it. And the hard core Trumpers will accept this framing.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Where a well-heeled women was getting into a her nice vehicle loudly commenting on "don't these people have jobs?" A protestor loudly told her, "It's Saturday, bitch."
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I was at a protest recently where an observer asked me why I was not at work. I replied that I worked from the age of 14 until 62 and asked if he had anything intelligent to say. He walked away.
DavidAbel
(21 posts)They did similar things in the uk. But there was never this level of sinister undercurrent, more just cowardice and control.
I wonder what it will take to stop the Trump/republican/Putin axis of evil and prevent it destroying America?
It's not like they are even trying to hide the dismantling of institutions and safeguards. Fascism is a known process and this is eerily following the natural course of this tumorous approach to governing.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)State ...
unblock
(52,206 posts)gee, i wonder why....
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Because they look like they came from "somewhere else"??
MFM008
(19,808 posts)And me laughing.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)marybourg
(12,629 posts)in front of Congressman Trent Frank's district office, State Senator John Kavanagh. Come on down and find out whether I and my fellow protesters require pay to do it. We'll give you an earful.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)destruction of freedom of speech. That is simply all it is.
I am actually surprised that Washington state if one of them because we are a blue state. I mean I live in a red county but I thought we were mostly blue.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)A republican likely introduced it with some republican sponsors. So even if your legislature is blue, the bill gets introduced, but it's unlikely to pass. Notice that Oregon also has a bill introduced.
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)violation of multiple constitutional amendments. Hell has a special place for this type of societal predator.
burrowowl
(17,639 posts)the present SCOTUS would rule against these laws.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)None of the rules of peaceful protests apply any more. The government has forfeited its right to govern.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Any bills like that likely won't make it past the HAHA stage in those two states.
applegrove
(118,639 posts)re: Citizens' United.