World's oldest fossils found in Canada, say scientists
Source: Guardian
Scientists say they have found the worlds oldest fossils, thought to have formed between 3.77bn and 4.28bn years ago.
Comprised of tiny tubes and filaments made of an iron oxide known as haematite, the microfossils are believed to be the remains of bacteria that once thrived underwater around hydrothermal vents, relying on chemical reactions involving iron for their energy.
If correct, these fossils offer the oldest direct evidence for life on the planet. And that, the studys authors say, offers insights into the origins of life on Earth.
If these rocks do indeed turn out to be 4.28 [bn years old] then we are talking about the origins of life developing very soon after the oceans formed 4.4bn years ago, said Matthew Dodd, the first author of the research from University College, London.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/mar/01/worlds-oldest-fossils-found-canada-say-scientists-quebec-haematite-377bn-428bn-years
This is a BFD, pushing the age of life on earth almost back to the creation of the planet.
ellie
(6,929 posts)brooklynite
(94,552 posts)canetoad
(17,158 posts)tclambert
(11,085 posts)Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)Moses was actually told to go to Canada, not Canaan, but his hearing aid batteries were dead, so Canaan here we are.
bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)When I saw "world's oldest fossils" I thought they were referring to the
ossified Republican Senators. My bad.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)When I saw "world's oldest fossils", I thought they had Mango Mussolini's cabinet in mind.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)life started 6,000 years ago , and Jebus rode around on dinosaurs
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)Amazing stuff!!!!!
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Who would have thought it?
Orrex
(63,210 posts)k/r
hibbing
(10,098 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Life is a natural process that is inevitable whenever the conditions fall within a (very wide) range. Currently we believe you need at least a little liquid water and a little energy. As last week's TRAPPIST exoplanets show, that may be a pretty widely available set of conditions.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Fossils from the Hadean period? I was under the impression that it was difficult just to find rocks that old.
Marthe48
(16,957 posts)But not as old as those fossils. There are some other exposed rocks of the same kind, maybe Brazil and Australia?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)But the date was in the same range as these fossils, around 4.5b.
canetoad
(17,158 posts)By zapping single atoms of lead in a tiny zircon crystal from Australia, researchers have confirmed the crystal is the oldest rock fragment ever found on Earth 4.375 billion years old, plus or minus 6 million years.
http://www.livescience.com/43584-earth-oldest-rock-jack-hills-zircon.html
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)I have a pretty good book about fossils found in different periods/eras. There is nothing in the book pre-Archean. I can imagine micro-fossil hunters see this as the holy grail.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... with all the melting ice and all.
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)totally bummed out!
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)billions of years before Trump's
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Amazing news. I don't think scientists thought life formed shortly after the oceans formed. This is huge.
Science!
jetcat
(37 posts)there's also a pretty good chance these structures are in the family of self-assembling iron oxyhydroxide tubes. See, e.g., http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/472/2195/20160466
canetoad
(17,158 posts)From your link:
We propose that some of these structures could be formed through self-assembly via an abiotic mechanism involving templated precipitation around a fluid jet, a similar mechanism to that commonly found in so-called chemical gardens.
A couple of scientist expressed skepticism towards the bottom of the original article. Hopefully the research will continue and a definitive answer is found.
paleotn
(17,913 posts)could have been the first life forms on earth, instead of evolving later to take advantage of tough neighborhoods. Makes sense, since the early earth wasn't nearly the garden spot it is today. Life may not have needed Darwin's warm little pond. In my mind, that increases the likelihood of extraterrestrial life forms outside the goldilocks zones. Makes you wonder what just might be under the ice of Europa and Enceladus.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)We are the children of extremophiles. Apparently there are still many among us. The Reputin party seems to love extremists - doesn't that make them extremophiles?
paleotn
(17,913 posts)Rethugs? That's insulting to extremophiles. Maybe idiotophiles? To not insult any other life form, I think they're a domain unto themselves....Rethugea.