Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,975 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:00 AM Mar 2017

Trump's team nixed ethics course for White House staff

Source: Politico

President Donald Trumps team rejected a course for senior White House staff, cabinet nominees and other political appointees that would have provided training on leadership, ethics and management, according to documents obtained by POLITICO.

The documents suggest the program could have better prepared officials for working within existing laws and executive orders, and provided guidance on how to navigate Senate confirmation for nominees and political appointees, how to deal with congressional and media scrutiny, and how to work with Congress and collaborate with agencies some of the same issues that have become major stumbling blocks in the early days of the administration.

But the contract was never awarded because after the election the transition team shifted its priorities, according to a letter the General Services Administration sent to bidders such as the Partnership for Public Service. The program was expected to cost $1 million, the documents show.

It is unclear if the administration put in place its own program or offered any rigorous training to appointees and nominees across the government. The contract-based training program was authorized in 2000. The Obama and Bush transitions both received the training.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-ethics-white-house-235586

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's team nixed ethics course for White House staff (Original Post) highplainsdem Mar 2017 OP
Gee what a shock... lagomorph777 Mar 2017 #1
Trump to staff: " We don't need no stinking ethics!" :D luvMIdog Mar 2017 #2
and Trump fans love this --go it alone--big bully--attitude from Trump! riversedge Mar 2017 #4
Donnie Rhea needs the money to protect Melania in New York. DK504 Mar 2017 #3
This is from a "guy" that does this: turbinetree Mar 2017 #5
The horse has left the barn ornotna Mar 2017 #6
Lol. Very well put. Hortensis Mar 2017 #8
Speaking of horses and barns, 45 now tapping Hortensis Mar 2017 #9
Have to wonder how true this is ornotna Mar 2017 #10
Well, he has offered, but I certainly also wonder about Hortensis Mar 2017 #13
I'm glad they did or they might have DeminPennswoods Mar 2017 #7
Authors! Authors! mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #11
what could be less useful to these corrupt assholes than an ethics course? 0rganism Mar 2017 #12

ornotna

(10,800 posts)
6. The horse has left the barn
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:02 PM
Mar 2017

and is two counties away now. I think the hinges on that door are rusted open. They're all scum.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
8. Lol. Very well put.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:51 PM
Mar 2017

Intractable scum. But only 45 lacks cleverness. They could have benefited by knowing better what "it" was so they could get away with it. They are besting the worst predictions for bizarre incompetence.

WHY on earth, having won, and with this hanging over their head, did they then name Russian assets to the cabinet and many other high positions? Does Putin have something on Trump and/or perhaps some of those around him? The only rational reason I can see--riding the tiger. Not that rationality is assumed.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Speaking of horses and barns, 45 now tapping
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:15 PM
Mar 2017

a Putin critic for his WH staff, Brookings Institution's Fiona Hill. A woman too, so a twofer.

ornotna

(10,800 posts)
10. Have to wonder how true this is
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:29 PM
Mar 2017

"Hill did not immediately respond to a request for comment."

Does she really wants to be part of this circus, and would her voice even be heard with all the clowns in charge.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. Well, he has offered, but I certainly also wonder about
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:32 PM
Mar 2017

her acceptance. One would think she must be without illusions. She might want to do good, but anyone joining those people runs a real risk of subpoenas and career and possibly financial ruin.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,434 posts)
11. Authors! Authors!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:57 PM
Mar 2017
By Isaac Arnsdorf and Josh Dawsey | 03/02/17 06:00 AM EST | Updated 03/02/17 11:35 AM EST

....

Authors:

Isaac Arnsdorf |  iarnsdorf@politico.com |  @iarnsdorf

Josh Dawsey |  jdawsey@politico.com

0rganism

(23,945 posts)
12. what could be less useful to these corrupt assholes than an ethics course?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 03:08 PM
Mar 2017

see? Trump's already improved government efficiency
i expect no less than an 80% increase in corruption throughput from this administration

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's team nixed ethics...