Trump's team nixed ethics course for White House staff
Source: Politico
President Donald Trumps team rejected a course for senior White House staff, cabinet nominees and other political appointees that would have provided training on leadership, ethics and management, according to documents obtained by POLITICO.
The documents suggest the program could have better prepared officials for working within existing laws and executive orders, and provided guidance on how to navigate Senate confirmation for nominees and political appointees, how to deal with congressional and media scrutiny, and how to work with Congress and collaborate with agencies some of the same issues that have become major stumbling blocks in the early days of the administration.
But the contract was never awarded because after the election the transition team shifted its priorities, according to a letter the General Services Administration sent to bidders such as the Partnership for Public Service. The program was expected to cost $1 million, the documents show.
It is unclear if the administration put in place its own program or offered any rigorous training to appointees and nominees across the government. The contract-based training program was authorized in 2000. The Obama and Bush transitions both received the training.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-ethics-white-house-235586
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)there was never the slightest intention of behaving ethically.
luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)riversedge
(70,205 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)ornotna
(10,800 posts)and is two counties away now. I think the hinges on that door are rusted open. They're all scum.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Intractable scum. But only 45 lacks cleverness. They could have benefited by knowing better what "it" was so they could get away with it. They are besting the worst predictions for bizarre incompetence.
WHY on earth, having won, and with this hanging over their head, did they then name Russian assets to the cabinet and many other high positions? Does Putin have something on Trump and/or perhaps some of those around him? The only rational reason I can see--riding the tiger. Not that rationality is assumed.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)a Putin critic for his WH staff, Brookings Institution's Fiona Hill. A woman too, so a twofer.
ornotna
(10,800 posts)"Hill did not immediately respond to a request for comment."
Does she really wants to be part of this circus, and would her voice even be heard with all the clowns in charge.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)her acceptance. One would think she must be without illusions. She might want to do good, but anyone joining those people runs a real risk of subpoenas and career and possibly financial ruin.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)avoiding shooting their feet off in the first 6 weeks.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,434 posts)....
Authors:
Isaac Arnsdorf | iarnsdorf@politico.com | @iarnsdorf
Josh Dawsey | jdawsey@politico.com
0rganism
(23,945 posts)see? Trump's already improved government efficiency
i expect no less than an 80% increase in corruption throughput from this administration