Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:04 AM Mar 2017

Sessions: I Didn't Discuss Campaign With Russians

Source: The Daily Beast

NBC News cameras caught up with U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday, the morning after reports emerged that he had spoken twice with Russias ambassador to the U.S. during the 2016 campaigna fact he did not disclose during his Senate confirmation hearings. I have not met with any Russians at any time to discuss any political campaign, Sessions told NBC News, continuing his camps insistence that while he met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, he did not mislead anyone by not disclosing the conversations. According to Sessions and his spokesperson, the meetings were entirely unrelated to the 2016 presidential campaign, despite the ex-senators role as a prominent Trump surrogate. Additionally, Sessions told NBC News that he will recuse himself from the Department of Justices probe of Russian meddling in the election whenever its appropriate.

-snip- (video)

###

Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/03/02/sessions-i-didn-t-discuss-campaign-with-russians.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl



Sessions willing to recuse himself from Russia investigation

BY MARK HENSCH AND REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 03/02/17 08:00 AM EST

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said early Thursday that he would be willing to recuse himself from any investigation of Russian involvement in the Trump campaign if it's "appropriate."

"I have said whenever it's appropriate, I will recuse myself," he told NBC News. "There's no doubt about that."

Reports emerged late Wednesday that Sessions spoke twice with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the 2016 presidential campaign. Sessions did not disclose those conversations during his confirmation hearings for attorney general, testifying under oath that he “did not have communications with the Russians.”

Sessions defended himself during his comments with NBC News, saying he didn't discuss the presidential campaign with Russian officials.

more
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/321947-sessions-denies-talking-campaign-with-russia
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sessions: I Didn't Discuss Campaign With Russians (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2017 OP
To quote Will Smith from iRobot nycbos Mar 2017 #1
" .... the meetings were entirely unrelated to the 2016 presidential campaign ...." Botany Mar 2017 #2
Like I said elsewhere. I believe he's telling the "truthiness": Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2017 #3
Funny how he can't remember what they talked about... thesquanderer Mar 2017 #4
Just like Trump's lawyer isn't sure if he a met a Russian agent in ..... Botany Mar 2017 #10
Good one! randome Mar 2017 #14
Ah! The subject doesn't matter anymore bucolic_frolic Mar 2017 #5
You lied under oath, J. B. Cracklin Charlie Mar 2017 #6
I don't think he was asked if he had contact about the campaign. He was asked if he shraby Mar 2017 #7
They are at the freaking convention, but didn't discuss the campaign? CanonRay Mar 2017 #8
Don't go by what he said under oath. Go by what's in his heart! randome Mar 2017 #18
I'm sure Jeebus already forgave him! CanonRay Mar 2017 #19
Heart? What heart? JudyM Mar 2017 #22
We have a White House and cabinet which has disassociated itself... yallerdawg Mar 2017 #9
Hey Sessions rule number one when you speak with someone from Russia turbinetree Mar 2017 #11
Wait! So you admit your perjured yourself. Oh my! Caught red handed. Literally red handed. ffr Mar 2017 #12
I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK WHAT HE TALKED ABOUT. YOU LIED UNDER OATH! Lochloosa Mar 2017 #13
+1,000,000 CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #26
Were these meet-and-greets MosheFeingold Mar 2017 #15
1 was a meeting in Sessions' office. The other was an off to the side meeting at a convention. JudyM Mar 2017 #23
You would think MosheFeingold Mar 2017 #24
Let's hope there is some substantive record, it'd be so fabulous if that goon could be booted. JudyM Mar 2017 #25
The republicans so far were more successful at using "Chinagate" hollowdweller Mar 2017 #16
Both cases that you cite leaves out the fact that BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #20
The transcripts will come out DeminPennswoods Mar 2017 #17
He lied under oath and NOW we're supposed to believe anything he says? displacedtexan Mar 2017 #21
They were just talking about... Dave Starsky Mar 2017 #27

Botany

(70,504 posts)
2. " .... the meetings were entirely unrelated to the 2016 presidential campaign ...."
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:07 AM
Mar 2017

So the 2016 RNC was not related to the Presidential campaign?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028733590

Botany

(70,504 posts)
10. Just like Trump's lawyer isn't sure if he a met a Russian agent in .....
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:16 AM
Mar 2017

.... Manhattan then went to Washington D.C. and the White House and
then hand delivered a sealed envelope from the Russian agent to Gen. Flynn
or if he just met the Russian agent in NYC and then threw away the
envelope from the agent after "the very short meeting."


http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/20/trump-lawyer-sent-flynn-a-plan-to-lift-russia-sanctions-report.html

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. Good one!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:33 AM
Mar 2017

[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

shraby

(21,946 posts)
7. I don't think he was asked if he had contact about the campaign. He was asked if he
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:09 AM
Mar 2017

had any contact and he denied he did.

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
8. They are at the freaking convention, but didn't discuss the campaign?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:15 AM
Mar 2017

Really. That's what I'm supposed to believe?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. Don't go by what he said under oath. Go by what's in his heart!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:08 PM
Mar 2017

[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. We have a White House and cabinet which has disassociated itself...
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:15 AM
Mar 2017

from fact and truth as a matter of policy!

These are sad, tragic days for our country.

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
11. Hey Sessions rule number one when you speak with someone from Russia
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:20 AM
Mar 2017

they are agents of a foreign state, and most likely Intelligence agent even if they have Ambassadors in front of there name.

They are spies, they are appointed to positions, there is no "confirmation" hearings, dip sh*t


Amazing RESIGN



ffr

(22,669 posts)
12. Wait! So you admit your perjured yourself. Oh my! Caught red handed. Literally red handed.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:20 AM
Mar 2017

LIAR! Double liar. You're the Attorney General of the United States of America and YOU ARE A LIAR that lied under oath to congress.

You're going to jail!

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
24. You would think
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 04:37 PM
Mar 2017

There would be a very clear record of the office meeting. I worked in the capital along time.

One goes through security several places, have to be on lists, on camera the entire time, etc. All that stuff is checked, signed, stamped and exists in triplicate with circles and arrows on the back to quote Arlo Gutherie. Probably shorthand minutes of the meeting, if not a recording, too.

I don't think much of the other meeting. I've been to a million of those and every ambassador and boot licker in the world comes up to everyone. I couldn't tell you who I met at one on the day I met them.

First one, however!

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
16. The republicans so far were more successful at using "Chinagate"
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:03 PM
Mar 2017

To defeat Al Gore and the democrats than the democrats have been at using the Russian hacking.

They were also more successful at using Benghazi to weaken Clinton than the democrats were at using 9/11, fake Iraq intelligence, and the financial collapse to keep a democratic majority.

BumRushDaShow

(128,966 posts)
20. Both cases that you cite leaves out the fact that
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:49 PM
Mar 2017

the GOP controlled both chambers of Congress during both of those time frames and controlled the investigations and narratives. When Democrats controlled both (under Nixon), the reverse occurred.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
17. The transcripts will come out
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:07 PM
Mar 2017

In the NYT story, the actual transcripts of the calls from Flynn to Kislyak was cited to give more detail in what they talked about. I expect the same to come out shortly about Sessions' calls/meetings.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
21. He lied under oath and NOW we're supposed to believe anything he says?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:54 PM
Mar 2017

I'd like to see his usual self-satisfied smirk face this morning, wouldn't you? I hope he's biting his pillow.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sessions: I Didn't Discus...