Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:56 AM Mar 2017

McCaskill Calls For Attorney General Jeff Sessions To Resign

Source: Talking Points Memo


By MATT SHUHAM Published MARCH 2, 2017, 10:14 AM EDT

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) joined several other Democrats in calling for Attorney General Jeff Sessions' resignation Thursday, after the Washington Post reported that Sessions met twice with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the presidential campaign.

Sessions told the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation process in January that he had not met with any Russian during the campaign, though his spokesperson told TPM Thursday that Sessions “met with the ambassador in an official capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is entirely consistent with his testimony.”

McCaskill called for Sessions to resign Thursday, saying in a statement published by NBC's Frank Thorp “it’s clear Attorney General Sessions misled the Senate–the question is, why? I’ve been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for 10 years, and in that time, have had no call from or meeting with, the Russian ambassador. Ever. That’s because ambassadors call members of the Foreign Relations Committee. Attorney General Sessions should resign.”





Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccaskill-sessions-should-resign
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McCaskill Calls For Attorney General Jeff Sessions To Resign (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2017 OP
A great comment at the end Sherman A1 Mar 2017 #1
Where the fuck is the rest of our party here?! elehhhhna Mar 2017 #2
I'm with you on this Plucketeer Mar 2017 #5
Are their no patriots in our Congress? elehhhhna Mar 2017 #10
Notice to White House Plucketeer Mar 2017 #3
Love this! JudyM Mar 2017 #14
Great point !! C_U_L8R Mar 2017 #4
I'm with her ffr Mar 2017 #6
Thank you for defending your country! Marthe48 Mar 2017 #7
What we do know from Flynn's case is that the Intelligence community were monitoring the Russian OnDoutside Mar 2017 #8
The difference might be that Flynn had phone calls yeoman6987 Mar 2017 #9
Who's to say that IC didn't bug the meeting or that another person that he related his story to, OnDoutside Mar 2017 #11
Sessions is going down, yeoman6987. Kingofalldems Mar 2017 #13
Can this Russian ambassador be subpoenaed? Bayard Mar 2017 #12
Time for a gut check. brutus smith Mar 2017 #15
This is interesting. Turbineguy Mar 2017 #16

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. A great comment at the end
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 11:59 AM
Mar 2017

regarding contact with the Russian Ambassador and members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
2. Where the fuck is the rest of our party here?!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:01 PM
Mar 2017

Why are they not en masse having a press conference making this demand? Do they not communicate as a group ? Is there any planning or anything else even going on? I am unwilling at this point to give them the benefit of the doubt. All this dithering , which in my opinion has gone on for a few years now, is feeling looking and sounding like a bull shit theater.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
5. I'm with you on this
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:06 PM
Mar 2017

Decorum's ASS! We've got president Orange against the ropes and we just can't find it within ourselves to deliver the KO volley??? Where's that cartoon with all the jackasses mortified at the sight of a SPINE?

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
10. Are their no patriots in our Congress?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:49 PM
Mar 2017

We're I threatened, bribed, or otherwise compromised...would I take this up had I the power and position to break legal rules and broadcast the facts? Don't know. But is their not one old school member - of either party - who took their oath to the Constitution honestly?

I don't feel like our party is even telegraphing to us that they've got this.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
3. Notice to White House
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:01 PM
Mar 2017

Be advised that, henceforth, for every nominee you offer for public office, two prior nominees must be fired

C_U_L8R

(44,972 posts)
4. Great point !!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:02 PM
Mar 2017

He had no business talking to the Russian Ambassador.

Or rather, no legitimate business.

Marthe48

(16,866 posts)
7. Thank you for defending your country!
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:11 PM
Mar 2017

Here is an elected official upholding her sworn oath to defend the Constitution! Thank you!

OnDoutside

(19,943 posts)
8. What we do know from Flynn's case is that the Intelligence community were monitoring the Russian
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:13 PM
Mar 2017

Ambassador, so clearly Sessions can't be sure what they know of his meetings with the Russian, and can't be sure that if they do have something, they won't leak it too. Hard to see where he goes from here, except the door. That explains his somewhat Jesuitical responses this morning....just giving what he hopes is enough, but only raises more questions.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
9. The difference might be that Flynn had phone calls
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:29 PM
Mar 2017

Sessions had a meeting in his office so possibly no transcript.

OnDoutside

(19,943 posts)
11. Who's to say that IC didn't bug the meeting or that another person that he related his story to,
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:53 PM
Mar 2017

won't rat on him to save himself ?

Kingofalldems

(38,406 posts)
13. Sessions is going down, yeoman6987.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:00 PM
Mar 2017

Along with the many GOP conspirators. And there is nothing their internet buddies can do about it.

Bayard

(21,979 posts)
12. Can this Russian ambassador be subpoenaed?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:55 PM
Mar 2017

Sounds like he is a major player with Sessions, Flynn, and whoever else.

 

brutus smith

(685 posts)
15. Time for a gut check.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:44 PM
Mar 2017

Do the Dems in congress have the intestinal fortitude to follow thru all the way on this?

Turbineguy

(37,278 posts)
16. This is interesting.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:57 PM
Mar 2017

If Sessions had not passed the hearing process he would still be Senator. Now, if he gets the chop, he'll be out on his ear. Of course he could run next time and get elected. After all, in a republican paradise aiding and abetting the enemy is hardly an offense.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»McCaskill Calls For Attor...