Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:22 PM Apr 2017

US Chief Justice Roberts decries "partisan hostility"

Source: Associated Press


Mary Esch, Associated Press Updated 5:15 pm, Tuesday, April 11, 2017



TROY, N.Y. (AP) — The "partisan hostility" surrounding the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch is of concern because it could undermine public confidence in the apolitical nature of the judicial system, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said Tuesday at a college appearance in upstate New York.

The appearance a day after Gorsuch was sworn in by President Donald Trump at the White House was billed as a conversation with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute President Shirley Ann Jackson. Jackson talked with Roberts onstage before about 1,200 students, faculty and guests, some of whom asked him questions.

"The Supreme Court currently does operate in a highly political environment, one that some feel has come about because of the refusal of the U.S. Senate to consider Judge Merrick Garland, President Barack Obama's nominee for the seat that opened up after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia," Jackson said.

After most Democrats refused to support Gorsuch, Republicans resorted to using the "nuclear option" to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster threshold for Gorsuch and all future high court nominees. But Roberts said the political turmoil didn't carry over to the court's work.



Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/education/article/Chief-Justice-Roberts-to-speak-at-RPI-event-11064665.php

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Chief Justice Roberts decries "partisan hostility" (Original Post) Judi Lynn Apr 2017 OP
Fuck him and the dirty horse he rode in on gopiscrap Apr 2017 #1
The country decries having a perjurer as a so-called Chief Justice. PSPS Apr 2017 #2
"Some Feel" maxsolomon Apr 2017 #3
I think McConnell already undermined any respect there was for the SC last summer. world wide wally Apr 2017 #4
Exactly! Why didn't Roberts interject his judicial wisdom when McConnell refused IndianaDave Apr 2017 #26
Hey, shit head, remember a fellow named Garland? pangaia Apr 2017 #5
+1 pepperbear Apr 2017 #7
He's a year too late to be anything other than a hack Fresh_Start Apr 2017 #6
but only when dems oppose it. pepperbear Apr 2017 #8
Self serving little prick. old guy Apr 2017 #9
This needed to be said a year ago. Remember Merrick Garland? NurseJackie Apr 2017 #10
The ship "Apolitical Nature" sailed a long time ago CanonRay Apr 2017 #11
I hope history will not be kind to either Roberts or Gorsuch. Lonestarblue Apr 2017 #12
Blame the Republicans for blocking Garland. You want to complain about "partisan hostility"? Spider Jerusalem Apr 2017 #13
I hope he's referring to the Republican hostility toward Merrick Garland. athena Apr 2017 #14
Weren't you the one who gave Obama a disgusting look during the state of the union? FU notdarkyet Apr 2017 #15
That was Alito. Same difference though. n/t jaysunb Apr 2017 #21
George Bush came around, maybe Roberts will... LakeArenal Apr 2017 #16
STFU, Roberts Skittles Apr 2017 #17
This so-called justice can go jump off a bridge dalton99a Apr 2017 #18
Greetings from Leslie Chow Kennah Apr 2017 #19
Fuck you Roberts NewRedDawn Apr 2017 #20
He had no comment on Garland being denied a hearing. Dawson Leery Apr 2017 #22
Yeah, I am sick of HIS partisan hostility UpInArms Apr 2017 #23
That's Chief Justice Citizens United myrna minx Apr 2017 #24
I agree with the title Bradical79 Apr 2017 #25
Agreed roscoeroscoe Apr 2017 #28
fuck off mr federalist society. talk about partisan. Javaman Apr 2017 #27
I decry Supreme Court Justice partisanship. milestogo Apr 2017 #29
Wasn't sure you even noticed Roberts. ATL Ebony Apr 2017 #30
Roberts decries partisan hostility with partisan hostility! I salute you sir! Truly a model JCanete Apr 2017 #31
Fuck you, Roberts and Citizens United with you nt adigal Apr 2017 #32

gopiscrap

(23,761 posts)
1. Fuck him and the dirty horse he rode in on
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:25 PM
Apr 2017

this started after George Bush did a fuck you appointment to the Dems after the loss of Thurgood Marshall on the court and put in that ignorant asshole, Clarence Thomas

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
3. "Some Feel"
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:26 PM
Apr 2017

Right. Just "some", having "feelings" about Obama being denied a nomination through naked partisanship. Some being anyone who paid attention to the entire debacle and isn't a Republic.

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)
4. I think McConnell already undermined any respect there was for the SC last summer.
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:28 PM
Apr 2017

I don't remember Roberts speaking out about that.

IndianaDave

(612 posts)
26. Exactly! Why didn't Roberts interject his judicial wisdom when McConnell refused
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 08:26 AM
Apr 2017

to consider a legitimate and qualified nominee by President Obama? Where was his deep concern then?

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
6. He's a year too late to be anything other than a hack
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:32 PM
Apr 2017

He didn't say anything about the refusal to consider Obama's nominee. so Roberts essentially confirmed that the Supreme Court is political.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
10. This needed to be said a year ago. Remember Merrick Garland?
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 06:38 PM
Apr 2017

Gorsuch should always have an asterisk after his name.

* Stolen nomination.
** Couldn't be confirmed without "nuclear" option rules change to override filibuster.

Lonestarblue

(10,011 posts)
12. I hope history will not be kind to either Roberts or Gorsuch.
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:07 PM
Apr 2017

Roberts has supported the notion that corporations have the rights of people, to the detriment of actual people. The conservative wing of the Supreme Court truly matches the Republican Party with their rulings that favor corporations over the rights of people. And now we have another originalist who can sway the Court with Republican theories devised from thin air. Roberts should have objected publicly and vehemently last year at the Republicans' refusal even to show Merrick Garland, a well-respected judge, the courtesy of a hearing. I hope Gorsuch will forever be identified as the only Supreme Court justice to occupy a stolen seat.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
13. Blame the Republicans for blocking Garland. You want to complain about "partisan hostility"?
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:08 PM
Apr 2017

Fucking jackwad.

athena

(4,187 posts)
14. I hope he's referring to the Republican hostility toward Merrick Garland.
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:13 PM
Apr 2017

Refusing to even meet with the guy is not hostility, but filibustering is?

LakeArenal

(28,820 posts)
16. George Bush came around, maybe Roberts will...
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:38 PM
Apr 2017

Do you hear me Roberts? YOU, YOU PERSONALLY COULD SAVE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY. YOU...JOHN ROBERTS COULD BE THE MAN WHO SAVED AMERICA.... YOU COULD GO DOWN IN HISTORY LIKE LINCOLN... THINK ABOUT IT....

Vote humanity...Vote for America... Save America...

Skittles

(153,169 posts)
17. STFU, Roberts
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 07:47 PM
Apr 2017

do know what partisan hostility really is? It's not allowing a black president a pick for the SC, so repukes can RAM THROUGH a fucking FANBOY OF SCALIA

 

NewRedDawn

(790 posts)
20. Fuck you Roberts
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 09:49 PM
Apr 2017

you vacuous looking corporate whore. Your Justice robe should have corporate logos covered like a NASCAR.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
22. He had no comment on Garland being denied a hearing.
Tue Apr 11, 2017, 11:07 PM
Apr 2017

President Warren would be glad to give you two more liberal judges in 2021.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
25. I agree with the title
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 08:07 AM
Apr 2017

The GOP stonewalled a qualified center right leaning judicial pick and instead changed Senate rules to install a perjurer nominated by an illegitimate president. That's about as hostile as partisan politics get, taking the idea to a whole new level.

roscoeroscoe

(1,370 posts)
28. Agreed
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 09:50 AM
Apr 2017

Roberts will have to appear before friendly partisan crowds from now on.

Won't be able to be respected by mainstream legal scholars, ever

ATL Ebony

(1,097 posts)
30. Wasn't sure you even noticed Roberts.
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 06:07 PM
Apr 2017

Where was all this righteous indignation when BHO was denied his SCOTUS nominee -- didn't get even a peep out of you then. Your partisanship is showing bigly so F you, creep.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
31. Roberts decries partisan hostility with partisan hostility! I salute you sir! Truly a model
Wed Apr 12, 2017, 06:18 PM
Apr 2017

Justice of the court. nt
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Chief Justice Roberts ...