Spicer Says He Expects Sally Yates To Tell The Truth In Senate Testimony
Source: Talking Points Memo
By MATT SHUHAM Published MAY 8, 2017 2:20 PM
White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Monday that he expected former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates to tell the truth during her testimony to a Senate Judiciary subcommittee investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Since revelations Yates warned the Trump administration that ousted National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was a blackmail risk in that position, because he had misled the Vice President about his discussions of sanctions with the Russian ambassador, President Donald Trump has attacked her as a partisan leaker.
Do you have any reason to doubt that her testimony, which will be under oath, will be truthful before this senate subcommittee? one reporter asked Spicer during his daily press briefing Monday. I would assume that when you raise your right hand and agree to tell the truth and nothing but the truth that youll do that. Thats the whole reason you pledge, he said.
Spicer also said at the press briefing that Yates had not, to his knowledge, cleared her testimony with the White House general counsels office. That point was subject to a brief controversy in late March, after Yates scheduled testimony to the House Intelligence Committee was cancelled.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/spicer-expects-sally-yates-tell-the-truth
NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)to frame doubt as to the validity of what AG Yates might say?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Watch the Evening News for verification of your statement.
jack69
(163 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)Sean Spicer wants truth. Sean Spicer wants truth. No matter how many times you say that, it still sounds weird.
cstanleytech
(26,286 posts)than they have already done to themselves because lets face it she wasnt in Trumps inner circle so its doubtful that she would have much if anything on him or his people.
Initech
(100,068 posts)FAKE NEWS! FAKE NEWS! FAKE NEWS!
cstanleytech
(26,286 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)cstanleytech
(26,286 posts)enjoys broad protections from being personally sued by someone those protections are not infinite and if he or his administration makes a misstep they could find themselves on the wrong end of a lawsuit for slander.