Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wishstar

(5,269 posts)
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 09:58 PM Jun 2017

U.S. senators seek military ban on Kaspersky Lab products amid FBI probe

Source: Reuters

"U.S. senators sought on Wednesday to ban Moscow-based cyber security firm Kaspersky Lab's products from use by the military because of fears the company is vulnerable to "Russian government influence," a day after the FBI interviewed several of its U.S. employees as part of a probe into its operations.

Federal Bureau of Investigation agents visited the homes of Kaspersky employees late on Tuesday in multiple U.S. cities, although no search warrants were served, according to two sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the FBI probe.

Kaspersky Lab confirmed in a statement on Wednesday that FBI agents have had "brief interactions" with some of its U.S. employees, discussions that the company described as "due diligence" chats. The FBI declined to comment.

The interviews were followed on Wednesday by the release of a defense spending policy bill passed by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which would prohibit the U.S. Defense Department from using Kaspersky software platforms because the company "might be vulnerable to Russian government influence," according to a summary of the legislation."



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-kasperskylab-probe-idUSKBN19J2IX

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
2. It makes sense to keep Russian companies out of our military systems.
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 10:26 PM
Jun 2017

That should be an expected consequence of Russia meddling in our election - a no-brainer.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
4. I had it before
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 10:34 PM
Jun 2017

It worked well. But, I didn't renew last year because of the hacking scandal as it unfolded

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
5. We were using a Moscow-based cybersecurity company?
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 10:41 PM
Jun 2017

All throughout the investigation into Russia's cyberhacking us? How stupid is THAT?

janx

(24,128 posts)
8. hmmm...When I had data transferred to this computer, the tech guy
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:09 PM
Jun 2017

asked me if I wanted virus protection.

Guess what he installed? Time to go back to Norton?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
13. I knew I recognized that name. Yes, Kaspersky is a big anti-virus program for computers.
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 09:11 AM
Jun 2017

I wonder if that's what the govt was using. I was thinking they were using a cyberhacking business. But I guess it's sort of the same thing.

And still....Kaspersky having ties to Moscow would be able to open the gates for Russian moles, if it wanted.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
15. Sophos. Really. It's one of the best out there.
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 11:48 AM
Jun 2017

McAfee still has a long history of being flaky. Kaspersky is just too much of a risk. Clam doesn't update enough. Norton is okay, but Sophos runs lighter for at least equal if not better protection.

We use Sophos in house and at both of our workplaces, and it's doing exactly what it should -- most of the time, I forget it's there.

But with everything -- let the system update. If you sit down to work and it tells you it needs an update or an update failed, that takes priority over everything that's not actively bleeding, vomiting or gasping for breath.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
16. I actually don't see that location matters that
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 11:56 AM
Jun 2017

much any more. Our government had undoubtedly done this as part of some deal that security experts believed worked for us before. And obviously no longer.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
7. Meanwhile Congress & the WH are more than just "vulnerable" to Russian influence...
Wed Jun 28, 2017, 11:03 PM
Jun 2017

They've sold their loyalty for it.

roomtomove

(217 posts)
9. DUHHHHHHHHH....
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 12:01 AM
Jun 2017

I do not use this product simply because IT IS RUSSIAN........just as I would not buy puter stuff made in China whether it is Apple, Lenovo, etc.

Chrysanthemum

(188 posts)
12. Is there any computer stuff made here?
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 01:51 AM
Jun 2017

I just assumed all stuff was made in China now. Where else are computers made? (I'm really ignorant on this topic!)

roomtomove

(217 posts)
18. software is designed here for the most part... I use Norton for antivirus
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 12:34 PM
Jul 2017

but nevertheless I avoid anything made in China or Russia..... computers are also made in other far eastern countries that may be safer than the Russian or Chinese stuff

politicat

(9,808 posts)
17. And what exactly are you running?
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 12:50 PM
Jun 2017

If you're not running a Mac Pro, I cannot see how you're sourcing anything.

IDE hard drives are easy - Seagate are made in Thailand and Malaysia. SSDs... Micron SSDs are built in Utah, but of Chinese components, because NAND requires a semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure based on rare earth metals. Crucial memory is designed in Idaho, but made in China. PNY still manufactures in the US, but they use Chinese components. Patriot assembles in the US, but same semiconductor problem. That's the best option for memory. Supermicro boards are designed in California, but primarily manufactured in Taiwan, and they're mostly server/blade. Which hey, if you're using a half-height for your desktop, that's really metal, but damn, your electric company must love you. Motorola shuttered its wafer fab; Intel still makes 24 and 32 nm wafers in Chandler, but those are mostly not for consumer market.

Are you building your own cases, or recycling vintage towers? What about power supplies? Rebuilding and rewrapping? I have to assume you're not running either a video or sound card, just relying on what's on the mobo. Also not using any sort of removeable media unless it's a 30+ year old floppy drive, and the belts for those are getting rare. I just had to rebuild an early 1980s Tandy floppy, and I don't know if I'll be able to do it again. No, I'm wrong -- you might be running a Polish or Czech CD/R, but that's pretty much the limit, and the media is still imported. You might be able to get internet access with an old Intel Ethernet card (manufactured before 1998, when that division shuttered at the Phoenix plant) but 20 years on a card is pushing it. Definitely not wifi or bluetooth unless you're running a server kit, and those rarely have integrated wifi or bluetooth because servers are intended to be wired.

I am genuinely curious what you're running. This is a huge issue, because the reason we don't have sufficient wafer fab infrastructure and semiconductor manufacturing infrastructure is because of the rare earth metals supply chain. The US doesn't have it, the Chinese market does not export raw rare earth, and the other sources are inconsistent and deeply bloody. (Go read up on Coltan, but it's only one of several REMs needed for wafer fab and semiconductor manufacturing.) China is the world's semiconductor source because they've got the reserves and they control that. They only sell to local manufacturers.

The only machine (excluding those built for Mil-spec, which are rarely available on the open market) that is designed, fully manufactured and built in the US is the columnar Mac Pro, which is built in Texas, and is a $3K to $6K proposition. The integrated board in that one is US built because the form factor prohibits the use of a standard board. Samsung builds those boards in Texas as a joint venture. Lenovo assembles Thinkpads in North Carolina, but they use lowest bidder parts, and those always going to come from China, because rare earth metals. A computer only uses a few grams of them, but they're vital.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
10. I recall this being brought up a few months ago
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 12:09 AM
Jun 2017

by someone here on DU. And now the FBI is finally getting around to it. Proves once again that DU is way ahead of the game. Maybe Mueller ought to hire us?

TomVilmer

(1,832 posts)
14. My use of Kaspersky Lab protects against NSA snooping...
Thu Jun 29, 2017, 09:58 AM
Jun 2017

... and Norton protects against FSB snooping. The best of two worlds combined .

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. senators seek milita...