Trump's voter-fraud commission wants to know voting history, party ID and address of every voter in
Source: WaPo
"Trumps voter-fraud commission wants to know voting history, party ID and address of every voter in the U.S." (full headline)
The chair of President Trump's Election Integrity Commission has penned a letter to all 50 states requesting their full voter-role data, including the name, address, date of birth, party affiliation, last four Social Security number digits and voting history back to 2006 of potentially every voter in the state.
In the letter, a copy of which was made public by the Connecticut secretary of state, the commission head Kris Kobach said that any documents that are submitted to the full Commission will also be made available to the public.
On Wednesday, the office of Vice President Pence released a statement saying a letter will be sent today to the 50 states and District of Columbia on behalf of the Commission requesting publicly available data from state voter rolls and feedback on how to improve election integrity.
Under federal law, each state must maintain a central file of registered voters. States collect different amounts of information on voters. While the files are technically public records, states usually charge fees to individuals or entities who want to access them. Political campaigns and parties typically use these files to compile their massive voter lists.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/06/29/trumps-voter-fraud-commission-wants-to-know-the-voting-history-party-id-and-address-of-every-voter-in-america/
Skittles
(153,164 posts)FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)Yeah, I thought so.
I'll get right on it. NOT!
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)my vote is between me and the ballot box. My age is between me & the DMV. The last 4 digits of my social security number is between me, my bank & the credit bureau.
The election integrity commission has no right to this info.
iluvtennis
(19,861 posts)hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Even if the whole thing isn't absurd, which it is, the social is a breach of privacy.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)this sounds like huge overreach on their part.
SharonAnn
(13,776 posts)cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)Please, thousands of lawsuits NOW.
Kobach? Just when you think it can't get any more ridiculous and surreal.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)iamateacher
(1,089 posts)Because we know what they would do with THAT information!
Catmusicfan
(816 posts)ozone82
(91 posts)Yes: "Under federal law, each state must maintain a central file of registered voters. States collect different amounts of information on voters. While the files are technically public records, states usually charge fees to individuals or entities who want to access them. Political campaigns and parties typically use these files to compile their massive voter lists."
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Trump and KKKobach can assume I'll be voting for some Republican next time around.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)there's an advantage to registering Repub. You get to vote in their primaries. It gives you a chance to vote for spoilers or against the worst candidate. You vote whatever you want in the general. I've never done it but I've been thinking about it. Here, I've heard some switch back to Dem when it's favorable to do so.
Just sayin.
freddyvh
(276 posts)the NRA has freaked out over gun ownership info being released.....
bet they could care less on this.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Voting is much more dangerous than shooting.
mountain grammy
(26,622 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,816 posts)Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)any documents that are submitted to the full Commission will also be made available to the public.??
Yeah, we've seen it all now, my friends.
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Find your legislator https://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,719 posts)In most cases that will be the person who maintains those records and would make the decision about releasing them,
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)He probably took the rolls from Kansas to show other states that the "good people of Kansas" trust the Trump administration to handle the information carefully.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,719 posts)You have my condolences.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)around here. We are close to a little turn around but I don't see it moving too far. If this does not get Kobach exposed for the total ass that he is he will be seen as someone the national leaders respect and will become our next governor. It takes a long long long time for a party without money, without the interest to take it to the people, without the advisors that really care about fighting hard to make a BIG change. We are working on it, there is a chance, I do feel a little more encouraged but the people as a whole who are out in the lonely middle of nowhere who only have their church to gather in will think that Kobach is a fine choice, after all our dear leader Trump apparently likes him.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)who was responsible for voting problems during the 2016 election primaries.
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)The American people and the Congress deserve answers ... what are these shysters up to?
dalton99a
(81,513 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)ananda
(28,864 posts)I'm sure Texas will comply, though.
The Reeps here want the voters purged.
FBaggins
(26,743 posts)Those are all public records that state and local candidates regularly get access to. In NC it's an easy (and free) online search.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)Response to Lucky Luciano (Reply #24)
FBaggins This message was self-deleted by its author.
FBaggins
(26,743 posts)No state would have a way to provide that anyway. There is no way to connect individual voters with the votes themselves.
The "voting history" they're looking for is which elections you voted (and, of course, your party registration)... not who you voted for.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)Which is a good guess about your party affiliation...
Then again it's already public information. My guess is they are doing this to try and orchestrate a national purge.
L-
gilligan
(194 posts)With any kind of voter fraud or problems with voting until Republicans figured they cannot win without disenfranchising people from voting.
Or cheating.
Lonestarblue
(9,998 posts)I just sent the article from the Hill to a local news outlet and asked them to investigate. I gave a bit of background on Kobach's voter suppression efforts, and also mentioned that Kobach is not part of a federal government agency, and he reports only to Trump. As such, there are no government protections for our personal data. I also mentioned that if the data is not protected, hackers will have a field day with identity fraud because they will have birth dates, full addresses, and part of SS numbers.
I also posted the article on my local Indivisible Facebook page and asked members to call our Secretary of State to object to the sharing of this information. I will email and call tomorrow, along with calling my Senators and Representatve to object. Please, join me in sharing this information wherever you can.
Crosscheck is a horrible program that is completely inaccurate. I'm in Texas, and we probavly have dozens of Latinos with the same first and last names. According to Crosscheck, only one of them should be allowed to vote.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)With this partisan bs 'investigation' needs to either brush up on this POS or is a POS themselves:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/magazine/the-man-behind-trumps-voter-fraud-obsession.html
He refers to himself as the "ACLUs worst nightmare" but what that really means is that he's our Constitution's worst nightmare. If he has his way the horrible voter suppression that's going on now would look like a child's teddy bear picnic by comparison.
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,719 posts)He hasn't officially refused yet but news reports indicate he's reluctant to do it. I've emailed my objection and I hope a lot of others do likewise. He's a Democrat.
Best_man23
(4,898 posts)Gothmog
(145,289 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,816 posts)Would they be ok with giving it to all political parties?
The Democrats, the Nazis, Russia, the Libertarians?
Well, if you give it to the Republicans, it's already going to the Nazis and Russia.
Yeah! Yeah! They have a legal right to it?
Should they?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)as the worst "winner" ever.
At least Bush 2.0 had just enough sense to not dwell on HIS second place finish.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)JHB
(37,160 posts)I'm old enough to remember when they would have jeered at such a Washington directive with fake German and Russian accents.
Then again, these days they don't need to. With the support Trump gets from neo-Nazis and the Roooskies, he hears those pretty much every day. Except they're the only things in his life that aren't fake.
farmbo
(3,122 posts)... who will share the data with Putins Bot Army for targeting during upcoming elections.
Someone needs to file for an injunction.
And fast.
Put me down for some crowdsourcing $$s.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Maybe we can ask them for it 😁
turbinetree
(24,703 posts)Just taking a glimpse over this it does not say that he has a right to SS numbers, or other information, such as party affiliations tied to the individual
Doreen
(11,686 posts)stopbush
(24,396 posts)Most other states will follow suit.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)International law
The right to hold elections by secret ballot is included in numerous treaties and international agreements that obligate their signatory states:
Article 21.3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, "The will of the people...shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which...shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures."[21]
Article 23 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the Pact of San Jose, Costa Rica) grants to every citizen of member states of the Organization of American States the right and opportunity "to vote and to be elected in genuine periodic elections, which shall be by universal and equal suffrange and by secret ballot that guarantees the free expression of the will of the voters".[22]
Paragraph 7.4 of the Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE, obligates the member states of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to "ensure that votes are cast by secret ballot or by equivalent free voting procedure, and that they are counted and reported honestly with the official results made public."[23]
Article 5 of the Convention on the Standards of Democratic Elections, Electoral Rights and Freedoms in the Member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States obligates electoral bodies not to perform "any action violating the principle of voter's secret will expression."[24]
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Voting History = What Elections Did You Vote In
No record can be legally kept of who/what a person voted for/against, just that they cast a ballot.
Ergo even if Kobach was asking for that info the States wouldn't have it to give to him.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)That coupd be accessed via a website...
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)In what is the largest known data exposure of its kind, UpGuards Cyber Risk Team can now confirm that a misconfigured database containing the sensitive personal details of over 198 million American voters was left exposed to the internet by a firm working on behalf of the Republican National Committee (RNC) in their efforts to elect Donald Trump. The data, which was stored in a publicly accessible cloud server owned by Republican data firm Deep Root Analytics, included 1.1 terabytes of entirely unsecured personal information compiled by DRA and at least two other Republican contractors, TargetPoint Consulting, Inc. and Data Trust. In total, the personal information of potentially near all of Americas 200 million registered voters was exposed, including names, dates of birth, home
addresses, phone numbers, and voter registration details, as well as data described as modeled voter ethnicities and religions.
https://www.upguard.com/breaches/the-rnc-files
Paula Sims
(877 posts)And I'll tell them the same thing... FU!!!
KRISITNA
(97 posts)Nitram
(22,803 posts)there is no evidence of significant voter fraud in the state.