Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,441 posts)
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 09:00 AM Jul 2017

Murkowski voted no on her partys health care motion heres why

Source: adn.com




Erica Martinson clock Updated: 7 hours ago calendar Published 8 hours ago



WASHINGTON — Alaska's senior Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski said Tuesday that her decision to vote no on beginning debate on health care legislation was a last-minute decision. In the end, an allegiance to "the process" won out.
......................



"I voted no on the motion to proceed today because I didn't think that we were ready for the debate. And I have said pretty consistently that process really does matter, particularly when you're dealing with something that is as direct and personal as health care, something that has an impact on one-sixth of the nation's economy," Murkowski said in an interview Tuesday evening after the vote. "This is big, and then you throw in major Medicaid reform on top of that," she said.

Murkowski argued that revisions to the Affordable Care Act, often called "Obamacare," are necessary, but that the Senate process has not been conducive to crafting good policy, "enduring policy."....................

"And so my vote today was one that said, 'We're not ready to go to the floor to wrap this up,' " she said.
........................................

Read more: https://www.adn.com/politics/2017/07/25/lisa-murkowski-voted-no-on-her-partys-health-care-motion-heres-why/



**Please take a moment to tweet @lisamurkowski to say thank you.

Also tweet to Sen Susan Collins








Sen. Susan Collins‏Verified account @SenatorCollins 15h15 hours ago

I voted no on MTP. When dealing w/ a complex issue that affects millions of Americans & 1/6th of our economy, we must proceed carefully. 1/3
2,952 replies 4,193 retweets 17,094 likes

Sen. Susan Collins‏Verified account @SenatorCollins

Making sweeping changes to the 50-year-old Medicaid program without a single Senate hearing is a mistake. 2/3





12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
1. trump attaking her will not help trump or Mcconell...
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 09:08 AM
Jul 2017

the fact is, only republicans can save themselves from themselves, now

AllaN01Bear

(18,726 posts)
2. they have and will be trying to repeal o care untill kingdom come.
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 09:14 AM
Jul 2017

remember acorn. wasting our time and monies on this shit.

turbinetree

(24,745 posts)
3. I am really glad that these two stood for what they think about health care right along with
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 09:44 AM
Jul 2017

48 "Democrats" right now, but they have not offered anything like Medicare for all to lower costs, they are still on board looking at trying to dismantle the program through the state with block grants which are POS hand outs, and will starve the program.

Also lets not forget one very important item there are 139 judge seats open and to be filled, and these two and many others in that chamber are going to let the asshole pack the courts with people that have no business being a judge, for decades to come.

And many of them will rule on health care and other issues, because after all she voted and Collins voted to have Gorsuch sit on the bench.....................that's what is really scary














Response to riversedge (Original post)

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
6. Actually, Murkowski just won re-election in 2016. Collins is up for re-election in 2020.
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 11:11 AM
Jul 2017

The vulnerable Republicans up for re-election in 2018 are Jeff Flake of Arizona and Dean Heller of Nevada.

karynnj

(59,509 posts)
9. Contrast with McCain: Quiet statement and no votes to dramatic speech and yes vote
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 11:53 AM
Jul 2017

McCain made the same call for normal process, but rather than speaking BEFORE the vote and voting no, which would have been done from a position of someone leaving a hospital bed to speak to his peers to stop a process that he effectively condemned, he ... spoke after voting yes to letting the process he condemned to go forward.

He had the position to turn the process on its head and he threw it away. Sadly, the right wing that he did this for will continue to hate and mock him.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Murkowski voted no on her...