Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 09:00 PM Aug 2012

Appeals Court OKs Warrantless Wiretapping

Source: Wired

The federal government may spy on Americans’ communications without warrants and without fear of being sued, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in a decision reversing the first and only case that successfully challenged President George W. Bush’s once-secret Terrorist Surveillance Program.

“This case effectively brings to an end the plaintiffs’ ongoing attempts to hold the executive branch responsible for intercepting telephone conversations without judicial authorization,” a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote.

The case concerned a lower court decision in which two American attorneys — who were working with the now-defunct al-Haramain Islamic Foundation — were awarded more than $20,000 each in damages and their lawyers $2.5 million in legal fees after a tortured legal battle where they proved they were spied on without warrants.

They sued under domestic spying laws Congress adopted in the wake of President Richard M. Nixon’s Watergate scandal. The government appealed their victory, and the appeals court Tuesday dismissed the suit and the damages.

Read more: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/appeals-court-oks-wiretapping/

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals Court OKs Warrantless Wiretapping (Original Post) Newsjock Aug 2012 OP
Sickening. 20score Aug 2012 #1
Senator Obama voted for retroactive immunity for telecoms. OnyxCollie Aug 2012 #2
Now that's some shit. The 9th Circuit is one of the most liberal appeals courts in the country, loudsue Aug 2012 #3
Ahh...but what else is new...we've been screwed for Decades now.... KoKo Aug 2012 #4
Hello friend! loudsue Aug 2012 #8
I know...it's been since the Kerry/Edwards Rally... KoKo Aug 2012 #21
"We shall have to see what Obama tells us he will do to rectify this in his Second Administration" stockholmer Aug 2012 #13
You mean the President woo me with science Aug 2012 #18
Yup, and how.... truebrit71 Aug 2012 #15
That ol' Fourth Amendment sure was nice while it lasted... kath Aug 2012 #5
Do we have ANY parts of the Consittution left to us???? dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #7
Well, you can still buy a gun. JoeyT Aug 2012 #10
People worry about the 2nd Amendment when they really should JDPriestly Aug 2012 #9
And about how they would ultimately be unable to defend the 1st & 4th without the 2nd. 24601 Aug 2012 #19
If you look at the videos of the assaults on the Occupiers, you will JDPriestly Aug 2012 #20
Yay, hooray. Let's all celebrate! malthaussen Aug 2012 #6
Sigh... lunatica Aug 2012 #11
Interesting financial split with the lawyers JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2012 #12
I don't understand how you can read the 4th amendment and square this argument to it... truebrit71 Aug 2012 #14
It's official! Hydra Aug 2012 #16
Had enough yet, America? woo me with science Aug 2012 #17

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
3. Now that's some shit. The 9th Circuit is one of the most liberal appeals courts in the country,
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 09:20 PM
Aug 2012

and if they're doing this, we are totally screwed.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Ahh...but what else is new...we've been screwed for Decades now....
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 09:56 PM
Aug 2012

We shall have to see what Obama tells us he will do to rectify this in his Second Administration.

SURELY...He HEARS our CRIES!

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
8. Hello friend!
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 12:05 AM
Aug 2012

We have to get together for coffee one day when I'm down in the big city. I hope all is well with you!

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
21. I know...it's been since the Kerry/Edwards Rally...
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:17 PM
Aug 2012

So much has gone beyond since then. I think of those days as the HOPE...for something better where we might have had chance to stop Bush.

But...it was not to be...and Edwards imploded after that along with his "Two America's Message."

Still ...it's good to see Edwards Message Morph into 1% and OCCUPY. Even though Edwards was a dud with terrible personal problems......there's something still there out of the "message" that was created for him.

We have to hope.....

Good to see you.

 

stockholmer

(3,751 posts)
13. "We shall have to see what Obama tells us he will do to rectify this in his Second Administration"
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 09:50 AM
Aug 2012

Hope you can you can hold your breath for at least 8 years (Obama's 4 more, plus Jeb BushCo or another Re-Thug's first term).

The US Constitution is going down like the

or perhaps I missed your

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
18. You mean the President
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 09:29 PM
Aug 2012

*who sent his Justice Dept. to the Supreme Court to argue FOR warrantless GPS surveillance and strip searches for any arrestee?

*who has publicly defended and joked about TSA groping?

*whose administration remained silent about a federally coordinated, nationwide, violent crackdown on OWS?

*who signed his approval of indefinite detention?

*who oversees "kill lists"/targeted assassination of US citizens?

*under whose administration the NSA is building a massive spy center for warrantless access to the email and phone calls of all Americans?

*who has approved or overseen proliferation of drones in American skies, grants for provision of military drones to police departments, and general militarization of our police forces?

*who signed the internet-censoring ACTA and then tried to hide it from the American press by claiming "national security"?

*who supported Joe Lieberman's CISPA-like cybercensorship bill even before the mild privacy-protecting measures touted by the press were added to it?

*whose administration is quietly moving forward with plans for an internet ID?



.......That President?

I'm sure he'll get right on it.









dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
7. Do we have ANY parts of the Consittution left to us????
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 11:38 PM
Aug 2012

This is nauseating, frightening, disgusting.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
10. Well, you can still buy a gun.
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 05:45 AM
Aug 2012

So the 2nd is still there.

The 3rd might still exist, but only on a technicality. You can't be forced to quarter troops in your home if we aren't at war, but it looks like we're going to be in a war for the next few decades, so I dunno how you'd check.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
9. People worry about the 2nd Amendment when they really should
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 12:19 AM
Aug 2012

be worried about the 1st and 4th Amendments.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
20. If you look at the videos of the assaults on the Occupiers, you will
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 03:25 PM
Aug 2012

quickly realize that you cannot defend the 1st and 4th Amendments with 18th century, 19th century technologies like rifles or even 20th century technologies like AK 47s.

Whether or not the Second Amendment is inviolate is no longer the issue. We are way beyond it.

Drones, electronic surveillance, mind control, these are the authoritarian weapons of the future. Guns are not that relevant.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,382 posts)
12. Interesting financial split with the lawyers
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 08:35 AM
Aug 2012

20 grand for the plaintiffs, 2.5 million for the lawyers? Way better than the usual 30-50% split.

Regardless of the financials, this is a big hit against the 4th amendment. One more slap after the "Patriot" act.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
14. I don't understand how you can read the 4th amendment and square this argument to it...
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 09:58 AM
Aug 2012

..I guess it really is "just a piece of goddamned paper" after all....

What a sad, sad day for America...

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
16. It's official!
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 07:39 PM
Aug 2012

You were always watched before, but now it's "legal" despite it being "unconstitutional."

Let's see...torture, domestic spying, strip searches, "show me your papers," assassination all legal now. Did we miss anything that the "Reds" or the Nazis were doing?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals Court OKs Warrant...