Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,690 posts)
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 09:57 PM Oct 2017

Dems Rebuff Effort Urging Sanders, King to Switch Party

Source: AP

LAS VEGAS (AP) — The independent status of Sens. Bernie Sanders and Angus King is just fine with Democrats.

Democrats on Friday rejected a resolution that would have urged Vermont's Sanders and Maine's King to switch their party affiliation to Democrat. The two caucus with Democrats. The action came at the Democratic National Committee's meeting.

The idea came from a California Democrat who backed Hillary Clinton over Sanders in the 2016 presidential primaries. DNC member Bob Mulholland says the Democratic Party should be controlled by Democrats.

Longtime DNC leader and Sanders backer James Zobgy led the DNC's Resolutions Committee in turning down Mulholland's proposal. Zogby says taking a shot at Sanders would "feed a Twitter debate that will not be helpful in bringing together" voters on the left.


Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2017-10-20/dems-rebuff-effort-urging-sanders-king-to-switch-party

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems Rebuff Effort Urging Sanders, King to Switch Party (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2017 OP
Their being 'Independent' apparenty OK with their voters left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #1
I agree totally. We need to leave them alone, they are doing fine. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #2
Not the most significant numbers of constituents in either state: George II Oct 2017 #3
As i said ... left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #5
Yes, their constituents - very limited constituents, both in number and in demographics. George II Oct 2017 #6
Congratulations ! left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #7
.. George II Oct 2017 #11
Makes sense. kstewart33 Oct 2017 #4
I don't want them, unless they are committed to advancing the party. Adrahil Oct 2017 #8
Then the party needs to change the rules that permitted Sanders to run left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #9
"... to Switch Party" left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #10

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
1. Their being 'Independent' apparenty OK with their voters
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 10:00 PM
Oct 2017

Their constituents keep re-electing them.

Why stir the pot and make trouble where there is none?

George II

(67,782 posts)
3. Not the most significant numbers of constituents in either state:
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 10:16 PM
Oct 2017

Last year there were a total of 320,000 vote in New Hampshire and 640,000 in Maine. That's the 3rd and 13th lowest number of votes of the 50 states.

A total of 135,000,000 voters went to the polls nationwide.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
8. I don't want them, unless they are committed to advancing the party.
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 09:43 AM
Oct 2017

No more "special guest" Presidential candidates either. Either commit to the party or stay the fuck out of our business.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
9. Then the party needs to change the rules that permitted Sanders to run
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:04 AM
Oct 2017

You can't both allow it,
and then say don't do it.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
10. "... to Switch Party"
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:07 AM
Oct 2017

Since they are "Independent", I don't think they'd be switching parties.
They might 'join' a party.

But again, their voters apparently like that they are independent,
as they keep getting elected as independents.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems Rebuff Effort Urging...