Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 04:17 PM Oct 2017

Air Force: No plans to recall retired pilots to fix shortage

Source: Associated Press




BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 10/22/17 02:11 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Air Force says it doesn’t plan on using new flexibility under an executive order signed by President Donald Trump to address a pilot shortage by recalling retired pilots.

Ann Stefanek, the chief of Air Force media operations, said Sunday the added power provided by Trump is appreciated but the Air Force does not “currently intend to recall retired pilots.” Trump last Friday signed the order to address what the Pentagon says is a serious pilot shortage.

A Pentagon spokesman says the Air Force is currently short about 1,500 pilots, and had indicated that the Secretary of Defense would allow the Secretary of the Air Force to recall up to 1,000 retired pilots for up to three years.

Under current law, the Air Force is limited to recalling 25 pilots.



Read more: https://www.apnews.com/6fa95b14797942b3ba3f6f1a4c467605

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Air Force: No plans to recall retired pilots to fix shortage (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2017 OP
Good. Lucinda Oct 2017 #1
bee ess, if there is no hurry why did Trump sign and EO instead of just get Congress to up.. Thomas Hurt Oct 2017 #2
A plan is exactly what they have. unblock Oct 2017 #3
They apparently put a "flexibility" in place that they don't plan on using at the moment. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2017 #4
I'm curious, did the orange one's misadministration actually consult with the Air Force? Brother Buzz Oct 2017 #5
has TRUMP lied ????????? trueblue2007 Oct 2017 #6
Amazing queentonic Oct 2017 #7
Here's an idea: sandensea Oct 2017 #8
I would want to suggest anvils instead of parachutes... Kleveland Oct 2017 #9
Let's give them one parachute among them. Let'em fight for it mid-air. sandensea Oct 2017 #10
Sounds reasonable... Kleveland Oct 2017 #12
Complete tangent to this thread: I think you're wrong about terminal velocity Jim Lane Oct 2017 #16
after we attack Korea and Iran we will need them scarytomcat Oct 2017 #11
Generals guss Oct 2017 #13
I'm baaaaack! ThoughtCriminal Oct 2017 #14
So, to follow things through to Hair Fuhrer's logical conclusion A Morpheus Felinae Oct 2017 #15
Piliots fly to Canada Corgigal Oct 2017 #17

unblock

(52,328 posts)
3. A plan is exactly what they have.
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 04:34 PM
Oct 2017

They haven't invoked the plan, but they explicitly put a plan in place.

queentonic

(243 posts)
7. Amazing
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 05:59 PM
Oct 2017

The Commander in Chief is being told "no" by the Air Force. Who would have ever thought such a thing could ever happen. The Dumpster is impotent. He was just castrated by the military.

sandensea

(21,670 posts)
8. Here's an idea:
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 06:32 PM
Oct 2017

Stick Cheeto, Dense Pence, and Kelly, in a B-1 bomber - and toss'em over whatever country they were planning on invading.

Parachutes optional.

Kleveland

(1,257 posts)
9. I would want to suggest anvils instead of parachutes...
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 06:39 PM
Oct 2017

But from what I understand about terminal velocity, it would not help the rate of descent.

sandensea

(21,670 posts)
10. Let's give them one parachute among them. Let'em fight for it mid-air.
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 07:34 PM
Oct 2017

My money's on Kelly, since unlike his boss he didn't dodge the draft and thus has military training.

Kleveland

(1,257 posts)
12. Sounds reasonable...
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 08:32 PM
Oct 2017

Except that *Rump would then probably pull out a pocket knife, and cut the cords after deployment, thinking that if he can't have it, then no one will!

The nuclear option.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
16. Complete tangent to this thread: I think you're wrong about terminal velocity
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 03:36 PM
Oct 2017

My first thought was that the anvil, by increasing the total mass, would increase the terminal velocity. Then I thought that, if a falling human with an anvil held it out in front of him, or in any other position that increased the surface area that was parallel to the ground, that would slightly decrease his terminal velocity.

As best I can figure out from the Wikipedia article on "Terminal velocity", both these considerations are accurate. Terminal velocity depends in part on m/A, where m is the mass of the object and A is the surface area. To account for buoyancy effects, m must be reduced by the mass of the additional air displaced by the anvil.

My tentative conclusion is that the anvil might increase or decrease terminal velocity, depending on its mass, density, shape, and how it's held. So, if I happen to fall out of an airplane while holding an anvil, I still won't know whether to drop it or not.

15. So, to follow things through to Hair Fuhrer's logical conclusion
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 02:04 PM
Oct 2017

Friday Hair Fuhrer signs an order allowing an additional 1000 Air Force pilots to be called up (drafted)
The Air Force replies saying it does not “currently intend to recall retired pilots.” (Thanks, but no thanks)
Next up: Hair Fuhrer ORDERS the Air Force to recall 1000 Air Force pilots. (Oh shit)
I think I see where this is going. I guess I'll go ahead and accept that Capitol One Visa with the 23.99% APR. Maybe I'll get two!

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
17. Piliots fly to Canada
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 03:41 PM
Oct 2017

Show them this article, they would go oh hell no. You stay with your family and wave to us.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Air Force: No plans to re...