Air Force: No plans to recall retired pilots to fix shortage
Source: Associated Press
BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 10/22/17 02:11 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) The Air Force says it doesnt plan on using new flexibility under an executive order signed by President Donald Trump to address a pilot shortage by recalling retired pilots.
Ann Stefanek, the chief of Air Force media operations, said Sunday the added power provided by Trump is appreciated but the Air Force does not currently intend to recall retired pilots. Trump last Friday signed the order to address what the Pentagon says is a serious pilot shortage.
A Pentagon spokesman says the Air Force is currently short about 1,500 pilots, and had indicated that the Secretary of Defense would allow the Secretary of the Air Force to recall up to 1,000 retired pilots for up to three years.
Under current law, the Air Force is limited to recalling 25 pilots.
Read more: https://www.apnews.com/6fa95b14797942b3ba3f6f1a4c467605
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)the limit
unblock
(52,328 posts)They haven't invoked the plan, but they explicitly put a plan in place.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,466 posts)trueblue2007
(17,240 posts)queentonic
(243 posts)The Commander in Chief is being told "no" by the Air Force. Who would have ever thought such a thing could ever happen. The Dumpster is impotent. He was just castrated by the military.
sandensea
(21,670 posts)Stick Cheeto, Dense Pence, and Kelly, in a B-1 bomber - and toss'em over whatever country they were planning on invading.
Parachutes optional.
Kleveland
(1,257 posts)But from what I understand about terminal velocity, it would not help the rate of descent.
sandensea
(21,670 posts)My money's on Kelly, since unlike his boss he didn't dodge the draft and thus has military training.
Kleveland
(1,257 posts)Except that *Rump would then probably pull out a pocket knife, and cut the cords after deployment, thinking that if he can't have it, then no one will!
The nuclear option.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)My first thought was that the anvil, by increasing the total mass, would increase the terminal velocity. Then I thought that, if a falling human with an anvil held it out in front of him, or in any other position that increased the surface area that was parallel to the ground, that would slightly decrease his terminal velocity.
As best I can figure out from the Wikipedia article on "Terminal velocity", both these considerations are accurate. Terminal velocity depends in part on m/A, where m is the mass of the object and A is the surface area. To account for buoyancy effects, m must be reduced by the mass of the additional air displaced by the anvil.
My tentative conclusion is that the anvil might increase or decrease terminal velocity, depending on its mass, density, shape, and how it's held. So, if I happen to fall out of an airplane while holding an anvil, I still won't know whether to drop it or not.
scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)to drop bombs and destroy infrastucture
The Generals run this country now. Not the president. their plan, its a coup
ThoughtCriminal
(14,049 posts)A Morpheus Felinae
(41 posts)Friday Hair Fuhrer signs an order allowing an additional 1000 Air Force pilots to be called up (drafted)
The Air Force replies saying it does not currently intend to recall retired pilots. (Thanks, but no thanks)
Next up: Hair Fuhrer ORDERS the Air Force to recall 1000 Air Force pilots. (Oh shit)
I think I see where this is going. I guess I'll go ahead and accept that Capitol One Visa with the 23.99% APR. Maybe I'll get two!
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Show them this article, they would go oh hell no. You stay with your family and wave to us.