E.P.A. Cancels Talk on Climate Change by Agency Scientists
Source: nytimes
Lisa Friedmam Oct. 22, 2017
WASHINGTON ...............
................ He provided no further explanation.
Scientists involved in the program said that much of the discussion at the event centers on climate change. Many said they were surprised by the E.P.A.s last-minute cancellation, particularly since the agency helps to fund the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program, which is hosting the conference. The scientists who have been barred from speaking contributed substantial material to a 400-page report to be issued on Monday.
The move highlights widespread concern that the E.P.A. will silence government scientists from speaking publicly or conducting work on climate change. Scott Pruitt, the agency administrator, has said that he does not believe human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are primarily responsible for the warming of the planet.
Its definitely a blatant example of the scientific censorship we all suspected was going to start being enforced at E.P.A., said John King, a professor of oceanography at the University of Rhode Island .....................
Mondays conference is designed to draw attention to the health of Narragansett Bay, the largest estuary in New England and a key to the regions tourism and fishing industries. Rhode Islands entire congressional delegation, all Democrats, will attend a morning news conference. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, an outspoken critic of Mr. Pruitt, will be among the speakers.................................
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/22/climate/epa-scientists.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
It must be demoralizing to work at the EPA and be a scientist!!
The Narragansett Bay Estuary Program is funded through the E.P.A.s approximately $26 million National Estuary Program. Erik Jacobs for The New York Times
bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)against all logic, science, reason
sandensea
(21,620 posts)walkingman
(7,591 posts)mpcamb
(2,870 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)who did this. Article does not say. just says no explanation given. But the order came from somewhere.