Treasury: U.S. to lose $25 billion on auto bailout
Source: Detroit News
Washington -The Treasury Department says in a new report the government expects to lose more than $25 billion on the $85 billion auto bailout. That's 15 percent higher than its previous forecast.
In a monthly report sent to Congress on Friday, the Obama administration boosted its forecast of expected losses by more than $3.3 billion to almost $25.1 billion, up from $21.7 billion in the last quarterly update. The report may still underestimate the losses. The report covers predicted losses through May 31, when GM's stock price was $22.20 a share.
On Monday, GM stock fell $0.07, or 0.3 percent, to $20.47. At that price, the government would lose another $850 million on its GM bailout.
The government still holds 500 million shares of GM stock and needs to sell them for about $53 each to recover its entire $49.5 billion bailout. At the current price, the Treasury would lose more than $16 billion on its GM bailout. The steep decline in GM's stock price has indefinitely delayed the Treasury's sale of its remaining 26 percent stake in GM. No sale will take place before the November election.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120813/AUTO01/208130392
Trillo
(9,154 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Of the latte-drinking liberal type.
In any case, while the car is not cheap, we are not talking Ferrari prices here.
And then of course are all of the jobs this vehicle has created.
Trillo
(9,154 posts)those who can afford one.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)I always think it's suspect when a company's CEO makes more than the company pays in income taxes.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Had we just let GM and Chrysler vanish, there would have been a million job losses, and a deduction of more GDP, meaning less tax revenue coming in.
All those unemployed people would then be drawing unemployment insurance, food stamps, welfare and Medicaid, thereby costing taxpayers more money.
All those unemployed people would have their houses foreclosed upon, driving the housing market even further into the abyss and depressing property values and property tax revenue down still more in the factory towns.
Volaris
(10,270 posts)minus overhead and operating expenses, why every penny of profit that GM and Chrysler make ISN'T going directly to the Treasury until that bailout is repaid. If I missed something, please feel free to explain it to me, as I am uninformed...
dmallind
(10,437 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)That GM hung in there means that the demand was there.
However, things like pensions would have become a government liability.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)http://articles.marketwatch.com/2011-12-15/general/30778140_1_iraq-war-iraq-and-afghanistan-veterans-budgetary-assessments
Auto bailout was money well spent
valerief
(53,235 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)This loss would only be realized if the government sold the shares.
GM stock price may well recover soon for all I know. Plus I find nothing wrong with government holding stock in some companies.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)So, for less than the cost of 35 days worth of American soldiers getting killed in an illegal war of occupation, we saved pretty much the entire economy. Sounds like a decent tradeoff to me.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/21/AR2007092102074.html
sofa king
(10,857 posts)The entire $50 billion cost of the auto bailout is equal to the amount which will be cut from the DOD budget every year for the next ten years, thanks entirely to Republican greed and incompetence.
So I would say that we the people came out ahead, didn't we?
ObelixS
(8 posts)The $100,000 Gold Certificate was used only for official transactions between Federal Reserve Banks and was not circulated among the general public. This note cannot be legally held by currency note collectors.
http://moneyfactory.gov/100000goldcertificate.html