F.C.C. Watchdog Looks Into Changes That Benefited Sinclair
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by muriel_volestrangler (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON Last April, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, led the charge for his agency to approve rules allowing television broadcasters to greatly increase the number of stations they own. A few weeks later, Sinclair Broadcasting announced a blockbuster $3.9 billion deal to buy Tribune Media a deal those new rules made possible.
By the end of the year, in a previously undisclosed move, the top internal watchdog for the F.C.C. opened an investigation into whether Mr. Pai and his aides had improperly pushed for the rule changes and whether they had timed them to benefit Sinclair, according to Representative Frank Pallone of New Jersey and two congressional aides.
For months I have been trying to get to the bottom of the allegations about Chairman Pais relationship with Sinclair Broadcasting, Mr. Pallone, the top Democrat on the committee that oversees the F.C.C., said in the statement to The New York Times. I am grateful to the F.C.C.s inspector general that he has decided to take up this important investigation.
It was unclear the extent of the inspector generals investigation or when it might conclude, but the inquiry puts a spotlight on Mr. Pais decisions and whether there had been coordination with the company. It may also force him to answer questions that he has so far avoided addressing in public.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/15/technology/fcc-sinclair-ajit-pai.html?smid=tw-share
bucolic_frolic
(43,311 posts)there is usually, perhaps even almost always, the opportunity for some type of inside job/quid pro quo/collusion
It is simply the nature of the beast
Gothmog
(145,619 posts)From the article set forth in OP
Antitrust experts said this new investigation may complicate the reviews of the Sinclair-Tribune deal by the F.C.C. and the Justice Department. Even if the deal were approved, they said, any conclusions of improper conduct by Mr. Pai could give fuel to critics to challenge the review in courts.
An investigation could cast a cloud over the whole process, said Andrew Schwartzman, a senior fellow at Georgetown Law Centers Institute for Public Representation. For the review, knowledge of an investigation could generate caution and even delay completion of the deal.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,368 posts)of https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141988380 . Please continue discussion there. Thanks.