Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,403 posts)
Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:55 PM Mar 2018

Oil Was Central in Decision to Shrink Bears Ears Monument, Emails Show

Source: nytimes



Eric Lipton and Lisa Friedman
March 2 2018
Comb Wash, a valley in Bears Ears National Monument near Blanding, Utah. Andrew Cullen/Reuters


WASHINGTON ............................
The debate started as early as March 2017, when an aide to Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah, asked a senior Interior Department official to consider shrinking Bears Ears National Monument in the southeastern corner of the state. Under a longstanding program in Utah, oil and natural gas deposits within the boundaries of the monument could have been used to raise revenue for public schools had the land not been under federal protection...............................

The map that Mr. Hatch’s office provided, which was transmitted about a month before Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke publicly initiated his review of national monuments, was incorporated almost exactly into the much larger reductions President Trump announced in December, shrinking Bears Ears by 85 percent.

Since taking office, Mr. Trump has been focused on expanding oil, gas and coal development and sweeping away Obama-era environmental initiatives that the administration contends hurt America’s energy industry. The debate over shrinking national monuments sparked a fierce political battle, now being fought in the courts, over how much land needs federal protection.

Mr. Zinke has said that the agency review process made no presumptions about the outcomes. “We want to make sure that everyone’s voice is heard,” Mr. Zinke said at a news conference in May during a visit to Bears Ears. He has also disputed that the review of Bears Ears was related to the potential for energy production, suggesting that the agency’s own surveys showed there was not a great deal of potential there.

“We also have a pretty good idea of, certainly, the oil and gas potential — not much!” Mr. Zinke said last year. “So Bears Ears isn’t really about oil and gas.”

Most of the deliberations took place behind closed doors. .................

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/02/climate/bears-ears-national-monument.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur



Long article. Worth ready. NOTHING but Corruption with Trump and his minions. damn!






https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000005585652/trump-dismantles-bears-ears-national-monument.html?action=click&contentCollection=Climate&module=RelatedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oil Was Central in Decision to Shrink Bears Ears Monument, Emails Show (Original Post) riversedge Mar 2018 OP
Seems determined to destroy human life as we know it. OhNo-Really Mar 2018 #1
As Gomer Pyle said Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2018 #2
Chris Hayes did a good segment on this article tonight. riversedge Mar 2018 #3
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oil Was Central in Decisi...