Trump asking for advice on Stormy Daniels situation
Source: CNN
By Maegan Vazquez and Pamela Brown, CNN
Updated 10:32 AM ET, Tue March 13, 2018
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump has been seeking counsel from confidantes on how he should handle the Stormy Daniels situation, a source close to the President tells CNN.
The source said Trump is being told by advisers not to fight Daniels' decision to break a confidentiality agreement because it would make him look guilty. This source said it's the only reason Trump has stayed quiet on the issue and hasn't been tweeting about it.
The source also believes the controversy potentially poses a bigger threat to Trump's presidency than Russia. The difference here compared to accusations from other women is that there's a signed agreement and a payment.
Daniels, an adult film actress whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, was paid $130,000 by Trump attorney Michael Cohen through a private LLC weeks before the 2016 election, and because Trump failed to sign the "hush agreement" regarding an alleged affair, Daniels' lawyers said in a lawsuit that the agreement to stay silent about her alleged encounter with the business magnate is invalid.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/13/politics/trump-stormy-daniels-handling/index.html
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Put it up next to the minimum wage sign
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)Resign.
Shoot from the lip passive-aggressive takes out Stormy and PA Election frustration on T-Rex. Were it not so childish it would be amusing.
Admit defeat.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)Then she'd stop communicating so much.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,431 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)Was this at the same time as Trump?
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)This stuff about Cheeto and his side squeeze(s) would have made it obvious long before the election...
this guy should have NEVER run for President.
Illegal money laundering disqualifies him
Russian influence (and collusion) disqualifies
Non-payment of taxes disqualifies him
Attitude towards women and minorities disqualifies
Mob mentality and questionable business practices disqualify him
Lack of religion and moral failures disqualify him
What were they thinking?
FSogol
(45,481 posts)Remember this article?
From Huffpost back in July:
A few days later, CNN reported that MSNBC officials were concerned about Scarboroughs friendship with Trump and his increasingly favorable coverage of the candidate. According to CNN, MSNBC insiders called Scarboroughs admiration for Trump over the top and unseemly. The Washington Post observed that Trump received a tremendous degree of warmth from the show, and that his appearances on the show, in person and over the phone, often felt like a cozy social club.
That coziness was caught on tape during an MSNBC town hall with Trump in New York that Scarborough and Brzezinski hosted in February 2016. An unaired clip of banter between Brzezinski and Trump in-between segments revealed the two of them colluding about what questions shed ask him. Nothing too hard, Mika, Trump says. OK, she responded.
Even after Trumps most disgusting and troublesome traits were revealed to the entire country throughout the campaign his abuse of women, his attacks on Latinos, immigrants, Muslims, and people with disabilities, his profound ignorance of basic issues and government policy, and the corruption and scandals surrounding Trump University and the Trump foundation Scarborough (and to a lesser extent Brzezinski) continued to lend Trump their support.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-and-mika-owe-america-an-apology_us_5957408be4b0c85b96c6622a
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)At the time, Scarborough was still an apologist for the Republican Party. So it wouldn't have been his job to disqualify a GOP candidate. As a journalist, yes of course, but he wasn't really a "journalist."
Too many other real journalists failed to do their jobs to disqualify the Trump candidacy. They were all complicit if you ask me. Just calling out one guy isn't fair or true.
What did the Huffington Post do in 2016? What did any of them do? They were so lazy in reporting poll after poll in which Hillary had a guaranteed win. Then they all tore her to shreds over and over.
Just sayin'
UpInArms
(51,282 posts)Last week, CNN president Jeff Zucker said that the news media is not the culprit for Trumps ascent and that networks like his own are simply doing their job in covering a leading presidential candidate. According to media analyst Andrew Tyndall, Trump was the second most-covered story of 2015, after winter weather, and the amount of coverage afforded to Trump in the 2016 election cycle accounts for nearly a third of all election coverage and more than all Democratic candidates combined.
Meanwhile, tonight in Washington, D.C., CNN hosts what could be described as one of the biggest ratings grabs in recent election-season memory. While previous debates and town halls have focused on one political party at a time, the network is hosting a three-hour special featuring live individual interviews with all five remaining candidates in both parties.
Record ratings, record advertising revenues
For TV networks, the Trump effect has meant higher television ratings for all election coverage in general and, in particular, a higher profile and record ratings for the 21 debates held so far by the two parties. Ratings for some of those debates have been so highwith, in some cases, more than four times as many viewers tuning in as did for debates during the 2012 electionthat networks have been able to hike their advertising rates well into six-digit territory for a 30-second ad.
CNN, for example, was reportedly able to charge roughly 40 times its typical primetime rate of $5,000 for a 30-second ad spot during its September debate.
SergeStorms
(19,200 posts)ever since he accepted jebus as his personal lord and savior. These numbnuts actually believed trump when he said that? What a bunch of morons.
dameatball
(7,397 posts)Aristus
(66,328 posts)"Um......Boss? You could have just not had sex with her..."
".........Okay, anybody else?......"
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)He can agree to let her give the money back and the campaign finance problems go away BUT she will blab about everything, including his tiny penis and bad breath and whatever it is he's so afraid of.
Or he can refuse, and it's an outright admission that he's hiding something, and there will continue to be problems with the "donation".
What to do? What to do? It's a shame that she only gave him a day to think about it.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)will consider him a stud...while the right winger gun toting evangelists
will consider it a sign of Gods will....
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,425 posts)SergeStorms
(19,200 posts)She doesn't.
At all.
Paladin
(28,254 posts)No, that would require an individual with a working set of personal morals, adult-level responsibility, and a genuine concern for the welfare of this nation. trump wouldn't recognize any of those attributes, if they came up and bit his huge ass.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)That will solve that problem and many others. It's simple.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)How fitting indeed.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)If there is one in that nup that makes it null and void your fat ass is going to get raked over the coals in what well surely be a DIVORCE.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)In fact, if Melania hadn't agreed to sign off on whatever garbage he did put in the prenup, he would have easily found another marginally employed Eastern European softcore porno model who would.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)If you read "Fire and Fury" by Michael Wolf, many details are given about it during the campaign. Actually Steve Bannon has all the women's names I think, so maybe he's given that info to Mueller by now. Michael Cohen paid them off so they wouldn't talk while Cheeto was running for President. Stormy Daniels was just one of them.
Do you think Trump would ever agree to a "no cheating" provision in his pre-nup? Maybe, but only if it means Melania can't cheat. He would never agree to "no cheating" for himself.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)calguy
(5,306 posts)you MUST confess!!
Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)If you are a Democrat and you are caught, Just say it was just for the sex. If a Republican, confess and cry in front of Evangelicals. You don't the story can go on for months. You do, and it is over in days.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Ummmmm, she would be the 4th.
C_U_L8R
(45,001 posts)so to speak, know what I mean, nudge, nudge, wink wink
mackdaddy
(1,527 posts)She seems smarter, and has almost normal thinking in the interviews snippets I have seen.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,490 posts)Not being able to run out and get him some strange every so often??
No doubt that was his pattern in the past, about every time he played golf. Maybe that's one of the reasons he's such a madman....having to go cold turkey!
..........