Trump: We're trying to top JFK by looking at Mars mission
Source: The Hill
BY MAX GREENWOOD - 03/15/18 12:34 PM EDT
Link to tweet
President Trump said Thursday that he wanted to "top" former President John F. Kennedy's ambitions to send a man to the moon by pursuing a trip to Mars.
"We're looking at Mars, by the way," Trump said. "Trying to top [Kennedy]. We're going to get there. It's moving along pretty good. A lot of things have happened, Mike, having to do with that subject. Way ahead of schedule."
Kennedy, who served in the Oval Office from 1961 until his assassination in 1963, set the United States' sights on reaching the moon during the so-called "space race" with the Soviet Union.
The U.S. eventually reached that goal in 1967. The last U.S. moon landing was in 1972.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/378595-trump-were-trying-to-top-jfk-by-looking-at-mars-mission
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)KPN
(15,645 posts)poboy2
(2,078 posts)knightmaar
(748 posts)Not sure what happened in 1967? An unpiloted landed or something?
flotsam
(3,268 posts)9 Nov. 1967 During Apollo 4, an unpiloted test of the launcher and spacecraft, NASA proves that the combination could safely reach the Moon.
https://history.nasa.gov/40thann/define.htm
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)Someone send him in a row boat across the Atlantic so he can top George Washington crossing The Delaware.
Never Forget: He's a FUCKING MORON.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Launch him next week on a Falcon Heavy with a big T painted on the side. Stock the capsule with plenty of Diet Coke, but don't include a latrine.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)thought of that before he gave away 1+ trillion to the rich bastards. A manned Mars mission is prohibitively expensive.But if its a go, I suggest the whole Trumpy brood suit up and shoot for Mars. Wed be so much better off.
Thyla
(791 posts)I don't believe a word of it from him.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Someone needs to tell him about the Mars Rover mission which landed on Mars 6 years ago.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Just sayin'.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)On July 20, 1989, the 20th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, George H. W. Bush then President of the United States announced plans for what came to be known as the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI).[1] In a speech on the steps of the National Air and Space Museum he described plans calling for constructing Space Station Freedom, sending humans back to the Moon "to stay" and ultimately sending astronauts to explore Mars. He proposed not a 10-year Apollo-style plan, but a long-range continuing commitment based on the three above elements, ending with a journey into tomorrow a journey to another planet a manned mission to Mars. The President noted it was humanitys destiny to explore, and Americas destiny to lead. He asked Vice President Dan Quayle to lead the National Space Council in determining what was needed to carry out these missions in terms of money, manpower and technology.
BillyBobBrilliant
(805 posts)Period!
Perseus
(4,341 posts)What an infant...MUUUULLLEEEERRRR what is taking you so long?
Lars39
(26,109 posts)underpants
(182,803 posts)Reminds me of the ceremony celebrating the wind talkers.
riversedge
(70,218 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)Does he have self-awareness? Always trying to be on top? Does he realize there are other people?
I just think if you asked him if ice is cold you'd get an argument.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)riversedge
(70,218 posts)rsdsharp
(9,177 posts)was 91%. It was 77% when we actually landed in 1969. The current top tax rate is 37%, and corporate is 21%. Where is the money going to come from, jackass?
braddy
(3,585 posts)rsdsharp
(9,177 posts)The point of my post was that the tax rate was much higher in the sixties than it is now. 1961 was when the initiative was announced. 1969 was when it came to fruition.
braddy
(3,585 posts)then gone to 1964. The way it was posted gave the impression that the tax rate was 91% until 1969, people tend to absorb misinformation by reading wording like that.
rsdsharp
(9,177 posts)You post what you want, and I'll post what I want. I didn't post ANYTHING about the "success" in lowering the tax rate. You are attempting to graft that onto my post.
My point wasn't about when or how often, or by whom the tax code was lowered but rather that the tax rates were higher throughout the effort to land a man on the moon, making it easier to pay for it, than it would be to land a man on Mars under the current rates.
braddy
(3,585 posts)1960s tax rates that someone might be misled by.
rsdsharp
(9,177 posts)I'm done.
blugbox
(951 posts)You are making a good point.
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)Perhaps he can lead the mission!
The River
(2,615 posts)He'll have to watch the take-off / landing from his jail cell.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)3catwoman3
(23,987 posts)...Hisanus.
matt819
(10,749 posts)Pa
Thet
ic
Those remarks are sad and pathetic in so many ways.
To dream of a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s was a real dream. In 1961 much computing was still done by slide rule. I can't imagine what the comparable dream would be today, but it isn't Mars, which has been on the scope of scientists for decades.
To top John Kennedy - that just doesn't deserve a response.
Ahead of schedule? There is no fucking schedule. Yes, much research has been done, and much needs to be done. But when you don't have any legitimate science advisers, want NASA to be led by a political hack, and haven't funded the research adequately, don't talk to us about a schedule. And then there's the issue of corporate interested in the race to Mars and the economic, political, and geopolitical components of that decision.
This moran is making that original moran with the moran sign look like a fucking genius.
Etc. etc. etc.
jpak
(41,758 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)Trump is a space cadet with his head up his ass. Widely hated. Big difference.
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Mega douche bag brags again
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Hes going to fund the mission by cutting taxes on the rich again.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Try to top that !!
Javaman
(62,530 posts)bitterross
(4,066 posts)So now we have to top other people - not make progress for the sake of humanity.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Space Force, sheesh...
paleotn
(17,913 posts)You gave all the funding to billionares and corporations! There's no money! We're not going anywhere. We can't even afford to get to LEO anymore.
I'd love for NASA to actual DO SOMETHING with respect to sending people to Mars, other than a collective circle "j" around the edges.....but to quote "The Right Stuff"..."No bucks, no Buck Rodgers"
Thyla
(791 posts)No priorities.
global1
(25,247 posts)rufnear
(29 posts)Maybe Trump and Kim Jong Un can change their upcoming meeting place and fly to Mars together. Hell, I bet Kim Jong Un would even supply the rocket.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Extra-marital affairs. And probably STDs.
LeftInTX
(25,331 posts)by his year in space.
He is no longer an identical twin! 7% change. I would post article, but on my phone. His body as taken a beating.
LeftInTX
(25,331 posts)chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)on the moon and return him safely before the end of the decade. So, trump thinks he can top this? 1. He can't, 2. He can't, and 3. He can't
braddy
(3,585 posts)chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I COULD say something....................
but...........................................
maybe I better not.....
dameatball
(7,398 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)What happened to "small government"? What an outrageous waste of money. Getting pictures from Mars was mind-blowing, and is enough. Why the fuck would anyone want to GO there? It's not the moon.
We don't have the money for this, Mr. Tax Cuts!
dameatball
(7,398 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)dameatball
(7,398 posts)sandensea
(21,635 posts)One look at Cheeto - or any number of other world kleptocrats - should be more than enough to convince them to nix it.