Officer charged with murder in shooting death of unarmed woman in Minneapolis alley
Source: The Washington Post
The Minneapolis police officer who fatally shot an Australian woman last summer has been charged with murder and manslaughter in the shooting, which caused international outrage and forced out the citys veteran police chief.
Mohamed Noor is charged with third-degree murder for perpetrating an eminently dangerous act and evincing depraved mind and second-degree manslaughter for culpable negligence creating unreasonable risk, according to charging documents unsealed Tuesday afternoon.
Noor was booked into jail at 11:16 a.m. on a warrant on those charges, according to charging documents. He is being held in lieu of $500,000 bail.
Justine Damond, 40, was fatally shot July 15 after summoning police to what she said was a possible rape near her home.
Read more: www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/post-nation/wp/2018/03/20/officer-charged-with-murder-in-shooting-death-of-unarmed-woman-in-minneapolis-alley/
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)Randomthought
(835 posts)I want him to sit in jail until his trial and after.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Aristus
(66,341 posts)n/t
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Randomthought
(835 posts)My neighborhood, Fulton in south Minneapolis, where Justine lived is very liberal. We have long been concerned about the conduct of the Minneapolis police. What is unique about this case is that the victim could not be vilified no matter how much the police tried.
Aristus
(66,341 posts)You said the area where you live is very liberal (and that's great; I couldn't live in a red area...), but it sounds like the cops tried to blame the victim somehow, which seems very much a right-wing thing to do.
It suggests to me that regardless of the political leanings of a region, the cops will basically be right-wing.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)to vilify and smear Justine, I think because the knew the case was so horrendous and indefensible. Some of the shit they attempted to come up with was really laughable.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)for shooting and killing black victims -- You might want to to give it a rest.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)lming everything, and not getting shot and killed doing it..
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Hyperbole really doesn't help
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Neither does confusing a statistical aberration with a statistical norm.
Please, indeed.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Do illuminate us as to the "confusion" in my post.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)1. It has to be in this jurisdiction.
2. The woman killed has to be the one who called the cops to an alley because of a suspect.
3. She has to be acting normally, more or less....not in an argument or confrontation w/the cops, just walking up to them after they arrive.
I don't think the copy should have been charged. What seems to have happened is that they were startled when she appeared at the car's window, in the dark, where they knew a suspect had been spotted. Seems like in his nervousness he just shot, when he was startled. That's negligence, not murder.
xor
(1,204 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 21, 2018, 04:48 PM - Edit history (1)
If just considered negligence, what sort of punishment would that bring about usually? Any idea?
I'm pretty sure I would get it for murder if I just shot someone from across the street because they walk out of a dark alle
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)he didn't even know what he was shooting at. And he reached across his partner to shoot, which put his partner in danger as well.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Justice isn't pursued for the wrongful deaths of Black women? -Give me a break.
Virtual Burlesque
(132 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)finally got the message . Watch his Republican Critics pounce on him for doing this.
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)but Kroll and his union goons also. He's done a great job at stridently whipping up his members against any kind of accountability and responsibility whatsoever, and he's been especially defensive regarding this particular case. I don't think he and his members realize just how badly they come across with such attitudes. They fought any of the subpoenaed officers being interviewed, they fought Freeman on the grand jury, their insensitive statements have been infuriating and cringeworthy. And then they wonder why people don't trust them.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Kroll is the problem and he loves to interject himself into any Police Public issue.
mn9driver
(4,425 posts)Noors partner has testified that they were both startled and in fear for their lives in the moments leading up to the shooting. For a police officer in the line of duty, that has always been a successful defense in Minnesota. The officer that shot Philando Castile was acquitted due to this.
Im not defending what happened, but the prosecution will need to discredit this testimony in order to get a conviction.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)In fact Noor could have easily shot his partner as he was shooting across the seat.
Randomthought
(835 posts)He said he could not determine any threat.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)and I presume wanted to talk to the police. If that's enough for a policeman to claim he is scared for his life, then who is going to be safe?
brush
(53,776 posts)If the Parkland cop hadn't been so afraid lives could have been saved.
The cop in the Maryland school shooting today shows how officers should react, and that was to a shooter, not an innocent woman who called 911.
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)they were in "fear for their lives", I think he just said they were both "startled" by a loud noise before Justine came to their car window to talk to them about what she'd heard and why she made the 911 call. And if that was the case, then why didn't the other officer, the one who was actually the driver and, thus, closest to the window, fire his own gun? Noor reached across his partner to fire, putting his partner in danger also, and before he even know what was really happening. Those are the first points I'd hope Freeman would make, and he's experienced enough to know that.
If officers can fire without even knowing who or what they're firing at just because, and every time, they're "startled", then we're all fucked and in danger. I'm tired of the "fear for my life" shit being used to justify anything and everything.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Just being startled shouldn't be enough for a cop to shoot, or who is going to be safe? She didn't have a gun, she wasn't threatening anyone with any kind of weapon, all she did is apparently approached the car.
christx30
(6,241 posts)on my way in, and I saw a cop at the door with his back to me. I coughed REALLY loudly to get him to turn around and establish eye contact with me. The last thing I wanted to do is to startle him and have him shoot me.
mn9driver
(4,425 posts)http://m.startribune.com/minneapolis-police-officer-mohamed-noor-turns-himself-in-on-charges-in-justine-damond-killing/477405923/?section=%2F
LisaL
(44,973 posts)And he was closer to the victim.
mn9driver
(4,425 posts)Mike Freeman would not have brought charges if he thought a conviction wasnt possible. But he is realistic:
http://m.startribune.com/minneapolis-police-officer-mohamed-noor-turns-himself-in-on-charges-in-justine-damond-killing/477405923/?section=%2F
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)for police work these days? Loud noises, unusual sounds, being startled, etc., are an integral part of daily work life for cops. If they're "fearful for their lives" at every single fucking instance of it, then why the hell are they even cops? And doesn't that put the rest of us in danger all the time then?
The cynical part of me doesn't even believe him, because he said all of this after everything had happened and he'd had time to think about it. Of course he's going to do everything he can to minimize his partner's culpability and responsibility.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)Officer Noor shot from inside the car reaching in front of his partner to fire his weapon out the window of the police vehicle.
Randomthought
(835 posts)I think he is too smart to go to trial unless he thinks the odds are good. I don't think he will swing and miss.
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)I listened to an interview with an experienced criminal lawyer the day this came out.
Its all a sham. By definition third degree murder means he didnt have an intended victim.
Its a crime reserved for people shooting at trains, for example. Hell get off on a technicality.
This was done intentionally to clear him.