Judge skewers Manafort's case challenging Mueller's powers
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge tore into all of the legal arguments that a lawyer for President Donald Trumps former campaign chairman Paul Manafort made on Wednesday in his long-shot civil case to convince her that Special Counsel Robert Muellers investigation has run amok and should be reined in.
I dont really understand what is left of your case, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said to Kevin Downing, Manaforts attorney, after peppering him with a lengthy series of questions.
Manafort filed a civil lawsuit on Jan. 3 against Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the Justice Department official who appointed the special counsel, in a key legal test of how far Muellers mandate extends.
Mueller is investigating potential collusion between Trumps campaign and Russia as well as whether the president has unlawfully tried to obstruct the probe.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/judge-skewers-manaforts-case-challenging-muellers-powers-idUSKCN1HB0E7
This relates to the CIVIL case filed by Manafort, not the criminal cases. The judge is the same judge who will be overseeing the criminal case in Washington.
More here:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-04/manafort-judge-skeptical-of-suit-disputing-mueller-s-authority
[div class"excerpt"]The comments by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson came Wednesday at the first hearing in a civil case that Manafort filed in January to claim Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election, overstepped his authority. Manafort was accused of money laundering and failing to report his lobbying in Ukraine.
Jackson told Manaforts lawyer that his clients case hinges on showing violations of federal regulations overseeing Muellers appointment, even though the law explicitly bars giving individuals the right to sue.
What am I supposed to do about that? Ignore it? the judge asked.
Yes, of course, said Manafort attorney Kevin Downing in federal court in Washington, as his client looked on.
Gothmog
(145,295 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)by a rump appointment, i.e. childish asshole who knows nothing about the law and hates minorities and Muslims, etc., then we can not only NOT expect justice, but the opposite.
THIS is why BASHING our candidate and HOLDING NOSES is so harmful!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Manafort is entitled to challenge the authority of the prosecution, but bringing that as a separate action instead of a motion to dismiss in the actual proceeding was objectively dumb.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)before Manafort loses it all. Kitchen sink Inc.
TranssexualKaren
(364 posts)It means that when Trump attempts to use the same argument there will be a precedent that Mueller is right to look at his finances in an investigation that is putatively focused on Russian collusion.
P.S. who cares about Manafort, he would never cooperate in an investigation of Trump considering that it would mean rolling over on Russian mobsters; at least life in prison is still life.
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)Hope this judge rips Manafort and his attorneys new ones in her ruling.
marble falls
(57,101 posts)money laundering Russian bucks for the GOP.
Maybe if he'd spent his bucks on a good lawyer instead of multi-thousand dollar suits he wouldn't have been subjected to a Judges ridicule as well as going to jail anyways.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)Rollo
(2,559 posts)Or, maybe "bullshit" will do...
.
Xolodno
(6,395 posts)...desperation.