Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:00 PM Aug 2012

Israeli attack on Iran 'would not stop nuclear programme'

Source: The Guardian

An Israeli attack on Iran would delay but probably not stop its nuclear programme, the most senior US military officer has claimed. General Martin Dempsey reinforced Washington's opposition to unilateral Israel military action as he made clear that US military chiefs were equally wary of getting ensnared in Syria.

In common with Nato's supreme commander, US admiral James Stavridis, who wrote about Afghanistan for the Guardian on Thursday, Dempsey put a brave face on the situation there. The chairman of the joint chiefs of staff was speaking to journalists in London, where he attended the opening ceremony of the Paralympic Games as head of the US delegation.

Distancing himself from any Israeli plan to bomb Iran, Dempsey said such an attack would "clearly delay but probably not destroy Iran's nuclear programme".

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/30/israeli-attack-iran-not-stop-nuclear

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israeli attack on Iran 'would not stop nuclear programme' (Original Post) alp227 Aug 2012 OP
What it WOULD do...is start WW3 though..... liberallibral Aug 2012 #1
Apparently, the attack on Osirak only made Saddam MORE adamant about gaining nukes Scootaloo Aug 2012 #2
the following is NOT a trick question.... defacto7 Aug 2012 #3
I have no idea Scootaloo Aug 2012 #5
It would probably make Iran want to start a nuclear bomb program though! Coyotl Aug 2012 #4
This weekend could get real interesting.... Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #6
My feeling is Feb-March 2013. roamer65 Aug 2012 #7
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. Apparently, the attack on Osirak only made Saddam MORE adamant about gaining nukes
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:42 PM
Aug 2012

It wasn't the Israelis that stopped him in that regard; it was the '91 Gulf War.

Neither Israel nor iran is going to try anything; Israel lacks the firepower to actually do anything to Iran. iran doesn't want to end up squaring off against the US. Neither has any incentive to strike first, and every reason to let the other make the first move.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
3. the following is NOT a trick question....
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 04:36 PM
Aug 2012

With regard to your reply, do you think Iran actually having nukes would be a deterrent to nuclear confrontations?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
5. I have no idea
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 01:39 AM
Aug 2012

I frankly don't think "nuclear confrontation" is even really an issue these days.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
6. This weekend could get real interesting....
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 05:59 PM
Aug 2012

If Israel was going to strike, my read of the political calculus would put the attack after the RNC and BEFORE the DNC.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
7. My feeling is Feb-March 2013.
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 09:55 PM
Aug 2012

I suspect Israel does not have an American "green light" until that point.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Israeli attack on Iran 'w...