Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,144 posts)
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 04:34 PM Aug 2018

Rubio's New Paid Leave Bill Threatens The Very Idea of Social Security, Report Finds

Source: HuffPost

By Emily Peck, Aug. 30, 2018, 12:00am ET

His proposal would cut lifetime benefits between 3 and 10 percent and cost $10 billion a year.

The paid maternity and paternity leave bill proposed by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) would offer meaningful benefits for new parents but only at a grave cost to Americans’ retirement savings and the core idea of Social Security, according to a new analysis from the Urban Institute.

The nonpartisan think-tank is the first to delve deeply into the particulars of Rubio’s bill, which he unveiled in early August. It’s unclear whether it has enough GOP support to even get off the ground, but the idea of paid leave has been gaining favor with Republicans recently thanks, in part, to the efforts of White House aide and first daughter Ivanka Trump.

Unlike the paid leave bill supported by congressional Democrats that is funded by a small payroll tax paid by employees and employers, Rubio’s Economic Security For New Parents Act taps Social Security funds. The bill provides new parents anywhere from 55 to 80 percent of their regular pre-tax pay for two or three months, but it “borrows” from their future retirement accounts to do so.

The bill’s supporters say the only cost to parents is a slight delay in retirement- which is fine, they say, since Americans want to work longer anyway. Rubio has also touted the bill as “budget neutral.” Neither claim is quite accurate, the new report shows...More...

Read more: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rubios-new-paid-leave-bill-threatens-the-very-idea-of-social-security-report-finds_us_5b86d4dee4b0162f471ed56b



The new analysis found that a parent using Rubio’s leave benefit would see a significant lifetime reduction in Social Security benefits- between 3 and 10 %; and those who take leave would have to pay back the money, with interest, upon retirement, and at that point, it could be as much as 4 times what they took out.

“There’s already a concern about retirement security and income. And people are increasingly entering retirement with mortgages and other kinds of debt. The idea we would reduce those retirement incomes further is scary."- Richard W. Johnson, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute. The bill raises basic questions about Social Security itself, a highly successful program designed as social insurance to gird Americans against the financial risks of old age. Rubio’s proposal would transform Social Security from mandatory social insurance to essentially a forced savings account.

The US is one of only a small number of countries that don’t offer women some kind of paid maternity leave benefit, and it is the only developed country with no paid leave. Polling shows wide and growing bipartisan support for changing this. The Rubio bill also fails to cover the vast majority of Americans who need paid family leave, for reasons other than a new child. Currently 70% of people who take unpaid leave through the federal family leave act, do so to care for a sick family member including children, or for their own illness.



Ivanka Trump has been pushing the GOP on the paid leave issue.
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rubio's New Paid Leave Bill Threatens The Very Idea of Social Security, Report Finds (Original Post) appalachiablue Aug 2018 OP
It is clear that he does not understand what paid leave means. SamKnause Aug 2018 #1
For sure, maybe doesn't care either. The lack of paid leave in the US is appalling appalachiablue Aug 2018 #3
He doesn't care. That is a given. SamKnause Aug 2018 #8
You're right about not knowing. Jedi Guy Aug 2018 #23
Wonderful for her and Canada. Women and people here really appalachiablue Aug 2018 #24
Yeah, I'm a lot happier here than I ever was in Arizona. Jedi Guy Aug 2018 #26
Glad you made a good move for all the reasons mentioned. appalachiablue Aug 2018 #27
So pay me now or pay me later. 7962 Aug 2018 #2
Lift the dang Cap! That's it. appalachiablue Aug 2018 #4
It is not a paid leave bill. Cold War Spook Aug 2018 #5
Correct. A poorly designed, deceptive slight of hand manoeuver. appalachiablue Aug 2018 #6
These termites continue to eat away in the dark the life blood of the working class . May they burn geretogo Aug 2018 #7
This is the Aaahole that got the risk corridors removed from the ACA. Smarmy POS. nt Snotcicles Aug 2018 #9
Sure did, good point. appalachiablue Aug 2018 #10
Wait a minute Haggis for Breakfast Aug 2018 #25
I don't know about Rubio, but Ryan (Romney's 2012 VP) and his appalachiablue Aug 2018 #28
Rubio is like a toddler playing with marbles bucolic_frolic Aug 2018 #11
The Social Security Trust Fund has been a lifelong target of Republicans. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Aug 2018 #12
and (3) ooky Aug 2018 #18
What's with the "run the trust fund dry" nonsense? PSPS Aug 2018 #20
Do you read? ooky Aug 2018 #22
Work Longer? modrepub Aug 2018 #13
It looks to me like the Republican plan for getting rid of social security ooky Aug 2018 #14
Sorry, but Social Security "running out of money" in 2034 is a myth. PSPS Aug 2018 #16
Unless there was a balanced budget amendment. ooky Aug 2018 #17
Sure, you can "unless" anything to death. Promulgating a myth is still a silly thing to do. PSPS Aug 2018 #19
Okay pal, you can back up and back off now. I haven't "promulgated" anything. ooky Aug 2018 #21
Impoverished women. They already make less, and will surely use this more often. Nt lostnfound Aug 2018 #15

appalachiablue

(41,144 posts)
3. For sure, maybe doesn't care either. The lack of paid leave in the US is appalling
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 04:43 PM
Aug 2018

and backward. And many Americans are unaware that other nations do provide family and personal leave that is paid for-- and not by robbing Social Security!

Jedi Guy

(3,193 posts)
23. You're right about not knowing.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:08 PM
Aug 2018

Shortly after I moved to Canada, a colleague was going on maternity leave and I asked how she could afford not to work for a year. She gave me this weird look and said, "I just go on mat leave and get paid a portion of my normal income." I'd never heard of such a thing.

Canada has its shit together.

ETA: Also, new fathers are able to take paternity leave if they want to.

appalachiablue

(41,144 posts)
24. Wonderful for her and Canada. Women and people here really
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:25 PM
Aug 2018

suffer unless in the top 10% maybe. Stressed, worried and deprived more every year it seems in terms of health and welfare, finances and quality of life. Like Canada, most European countries also receive paid maternal and paternal leave, 3 weeks vacay usually, etc.

SEE Michael Moore's latest movie- "Where to Invade Next" (2016). His interviews with Europeans are enlightening:
a Nordic group mentions that their successful school system is modeled on the (once-proud) US Public School System!; a couple in Italy talk about healthy and balanced leave from work; people don't go into DEBT from college or medical costs; French children attend excellent state-supported schools which provide healthy food and strong learning; officials in Scandi operate effective and humane facilities for people convicted of crimes, and more.

The Film SHOULD BE REQUIRED VIEWING FOR ALL AMERICANS!

Jedi Guy

(3,193 posts)
26. Yeah, I'm a lot happier here than I ever was in Arizona.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:35 PM
Aug 2018

I have health care, a good job (with protections, none of that right to work bullshit like back home), good public transport, I don't have to worry too much about some nutter shooting the place up... the list goes on.

The only thing I really hate is the weather. Hot and muggy in the summer, cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey in the winter. I really miss Arizona's climate.

I can't help but smirk and shake my head when I hear the "America is the greatest country on Earth" stuff. In a lot of ways, America is quite backwards, and 45 only seems to know how to drive in reverse. He's backing us up right towards the cliff, and his kooky cult is cheering him on.

appalachiablue

(41,144 posts)
27. Glad you made a good move for all the reasons mentioned.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:46 PM
Aug 2018

I've visited AZ once, Scottsdale and Sedona, beautiful and I loved trips to New Mexico. Although the western Heat & Fires that are escalating lately are taking a huge toll esp. in CA, Washington state, more.
We saw Vancouver, BC on a day trip from Seattle which was great, also Ontario briefly once when in Detroit.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
2. So pay me now or pay me later.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 04:38 PM
Aug 2018

I know it has nothing to do with this story, but Remove the income cap!!

geretogo

(1,281 posts)
7. These termites continue to eat away in the dark the life blood of the working class . May they burn
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 04:47 PM
Aug 2018

in Hell with their farther .

Haggis for Breakfast

(6,831 posts)
25. Wait a minute
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:34 PM
Aug 2018

Isn't this the guy who said (during the 2016 presidential debates) that his mother lived on her SSA benefits and Medicare and that he would never do anything to hurt his mother's security ??

Is she still alive ?

appalachiablue

(41,144 posts)
28. I don't know about Rubio, but Ryan (Romney's 2012 VP) and his
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 10:49 PM
Aug 2018

mother lived on SS and family help after his father died when he was a teen.

bucolic_frolic

(43,181 posts)
11. Rubio is like a toddler playing with marbles
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 05:10 PM
Aug 2018

small ideas in a small mind. He should be managing a fast food joint.

12. The Social Security Trust Fund has been a lifelong target of Republicans.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 06:12 PM
Aug 2018

First of all, its very existence is antithetical to their "law of the jungle" view of society, where only the rich are entitled to society's benefits.

Secondly, it represents a huge pool of money that can be siphoned off to their rich benefactors. During the Dubya years there was an incredible push to privatize Social Security and force people to invest in the stock market. However, citizens would be limited to a list of approved stocks. I wonder how you would get on the approved list? Do political contributions ring a bell?

BTW, you can have real estate -- even if it's mortgaged -- and coins and precious metals like gold, silver and platinum.

Tapping into Social Security to fund paternity leave serves two purposes: (1) it forces people to work longer (part of the Repug "work'em til they die" plan, and (2) it opens up the Fund for uses other than what it was intended. It becomes a huge pot of money to tap for their pet projects.

Rubio is evil.

PSPS

(13,601 posts)
20. What's with the "run the trust fund dry" nonsense?
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 09:51 PM
Aug 2018

Even if nothing is done to shore up its finances, Social Security will be able to pay 79% of promised benefits until 2090. Your other post about this made a similar untrue assumption.

Sure, there's a lot at stake here, and it may be addressed if we can remove the mob control of the government, but using alarmist metaphors that imply something that is just not true is counterproductive.

modrepub

(3,496 posts)
13. Work Longer?
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 06:20 PM
Aug 2018

How many people work in careers that allow one to work until they are in their late 60s?!? Hell, you're lucky if your employer doesn't try and push you out the door once you pass 50 but these folks think nothing of adding a few more years onto your normal retirement age. Even India has paid maternity leave.

ooky

(8,924 posts)
14. It looks to me like the Republican plan for getting rid of social security
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 07:12 PM
Aug 2018

is to do nothing until the social security trust fund runs out of money, projected to be 2034. Of course, using the fund for family leave will accomplish that even sooner.

PSPS

(13,601 posts)
16. Sorry, but Social Security "running out of money" in 2034 is a myth.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 07:42 PM
Aug 2018

Even if nothing is done to shore up its finances, Social Security will be able to pay 79% of promised benefits until 2090. The myth is intended to imply that benefits would just stop in 2034, which is false. Whether or not remedial action is taken between now and 2034 depends on our ability to scrub the mob out of the government.


ooky

(8,924 posts)
17. Unless there was a balanced budget amendment.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 07:48 PM
Aug 2018

Then it would run out and pay nothing going forward.

Its just an opinion, but this looks like a Republican long game to me.

One thing I'm certain of, they have no plan to shore it up so it keeps paying at 100%. And frankly if they cut it to 79%, that's not good either.

ooky

(8,924 posts)
21. Okay pal, you can back up and back off now. I haven't "promulgated" anything.
Thu Aug 30, 2018, 09:57 PM
Aug 2018

You read into my post things that weren't there. I'm well aware of the estimated continued payouts when the fund runs out. Go back and read my original post, and this time read it. I was addressing the social security TRUST FUND running out. I said nothing about "social security running out of money". That was your assumption, and it was wrong.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rubio's New Paid Leave Bi...