Hyde-Smith Demanded No Audience, No Press for Tonight's Debate
Source: Jackson Free-Press
JACKSONU.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith demanded there be no audience or outside press allowed at tonights U.S. Senate debate and requested other restrictions, two sources familiar with the debate negotiations told the Jackson Free Press Tuesday morning.
When she faces off against Democratic challenger Mike Espy at 7 p.m., only the debate moderator, panelists and the production team will be allowed in the auditoriuma requirement the Hyde-Smith campaign pushed for and the Espy team argued against.
"We supported having an audience, and we advocated for the media to have access to the studio, Espy Communications Director Danny Blanton told the Jackson Free Press, although he declined to confirm that it was the Hyde-Smith campaign that opposed a public debate.
The Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation, which organized the debate, told the campaigns that the decision to have an audience was up to the candidates, said the source, who asked not to be identified.
Read more: http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2018/nov/20/hyde-smith-demanded-no-audience-no-press/
Just to be safe, maybe they shouldn't broadcast it...
hlthe2b
(102,269 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)takes absurdity to new limits.
Polybius
(15,411 posts)Imagine that, a debate with just the moderator and the two candidates!
iluvtennis
(19,858 posts)be broadcast. If its not broadcast to disseminate the info, no purpose for a debare
RainCaster
(10,874 posts)Fucking DFT butt licker
Polybius
(15,411 posts)I'll YouTube it after work.
joshdawg
(2,648 posts)Who cares what she demands?
Croney
(4,660 posts)sprinkleeninow
(20,246 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)It is like going into a final exam with a full page of notes!
#They Have Rigged This For Her to Win'
#
A second source who also asked not to be identified, though, said the debate was "rigged."
#
"They have rigged this debate for her to win," the second source said. "Espy's campaign wanted full access for the press and a live studio audiencethey said no. Espy wanted no notes going in. Instead, she and her team will have time to build a crib sheet with everything she needs to say before hand. Espy wanted the candidates to ask the questions to each other directlythey said it had to be pre-submitted. Presumably that's because she isn't comfortable asking whatever gotcha question her handlers have hooked up."
#
Prior to the Nov. 6 general election, Hyde-Smith repeatedly declined to join Espy and Republican challenger Chris McDaniel, who was still in the race at the time, for a debate, citing scheduling conflicts and concerns that McDaniels supporters would be rude if a debate were held that allowed a public audience. In a secretly filmed video, though, Hyde-Smith said she was refusing on the advice of advisers who said agreeing to such a debate would be like handing McDaniel a $200,000 donation.
ZZenith
(4,122 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....THAT would be a story that would grab headlines nationwide.
liberalla
(9,247 posts)something along the lines of...
"you deserve a Senator who is available and accessible. One that's willing to meet with you and the press publicly, and not require a closed set to debate issues. Why shun the media, the public and our own constituency?"
what purpose does that serve?
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)Link to tweet
Judd Legum
Verified account @JuddLegum
BREAKING: "U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith demanded there be no audience or outside press allowed at tonights U.S. Senate debate and requested other restrictions"
1:42 PM - 20 Nov 2018
Snarky Fan
Judd Legum
Verified account @JuddLegum
33m33 minutes ago
Hyde-Smith's extraordinary requests were granted.
Notable: "The top board members for the Mississippi Farm Bureau, which is hosting the debate, have all donated to Hyde-Smith"
27 replies 209 retweets 230 likes
New conversation
Arabella Trefoil
@ArabellaTrefoil
31m31 minutes ago
Replying to @JuddLegum
Will she allow Espy to be in the same room with her?
2 replies 7 retweets 80 likes
Lindsey Straus
@Take2Hit2Left
28m28 minutes ago
A segregated debate. How Mississippian.
2 replies 10 retweets 86 likes
1 more reply
Chris Bastian
@ChrisBastianBkl
32m32 minutes ago
Replying to @JuddLegum
Perhaps, to be safe, they shouldn't broadcast it either?
0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
New conversation
✨Athena44
✨
@MonroeG5
29m29 minutes ago
Replying to @JuddLegum
Wow, seem like the lynching lady is scared.
3 replies 12 retweets 44 likes
1 more reply
New conversation
ZeroShits2Give
@ZeroShits2Give
32m32 minutes ago
Replying to @JuddLegum
no audience at a debate... then there is no point to this debate.
1 reply 11 retweets 70 likes
Dan Krall
🏳️🌈
@DanielTKrall
28m28 minutes ago
It's the ol' @SenToomey move
7962
(11,841 posts)Audiences waste a lot of time. They react even if they're told not to, and I dont need to hear "Lock her up!" break out a dozen times either.
Everyone can watch at home and see the good or stupid of the entire thing.
But I'm probably in the minority in that opinion.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Post removed
smb
(3,471 posts)Just a Weirdo
(488 posts)And bring in everyone for the debates. Hyde Smith could not show up if she is too skerrid of real people.
world wide wally
(21,743 posts)Why not just discuss McDonalds new menu in private?
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)a very demanding little MagaHag.
Archae
(46,327 posts)0rganism
(23,953 posts)the safe was hidden behind filing cabinets and guarded by tigers