Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 02:26 PM Feb 2019

Philadelphia beats U.S. appeal in sanctuary city case

Source: Reuters



FEBRUARY 15, 2019 / 12:53 PM / UPDATED 31 MINUTES AGO

Jonathan Stempel
3 MIN READ

(Reuters) - A federal appeals court said on Friday the Trump administration cannot cut off grants to Philadelphia for its refusal to cooperate with immigration authorities seeking to deport immigrants who are in the country illegally.

In a 3-0 decision, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said the U.S. attorney general lacked power to condition that city’s receipt of $1.6 million for local law enforcement on its compliance with three new requirements.

These included alerting Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials when undocumented immigrants are being released from prison, providing access to interview immigrants, and barring the withholding of immigrants’ citizenship status.

Several other “sanctuary cities” have also opposed to the requirements, and Chicago, New York and San Francisco have won court rulings blocking their enforcement.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-philadelphia/philadelphia-beats-u-s-appeal-in-sanctuary-city-case-idUSKCN1Q42BS?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Philadelphia beats U.S. appeal in sanctuary city case (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2019 OP
Excellent news iluvtennis Feb 2019 #1
Good BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #2
Good, a precedent. BigmanPigman Feb 2019 #3

BumRushDaShow

(128,958 posts)
2. Good
Fri Feb 15, 2019, 02:47 PM
Feb 2019
Because this reasserts the fact that Congress is the one that programs and allocates money for specific things and often for specific reasons. And these things can't ad hoc dismissed or added to by the Executive Branch as criteria beyond what Congress has authorized for receipt of those funds.

If Congress wants to authorize funding with some stipulation such as "cooperation with" (partnership) for immigration issues, then that is up to them.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Philadelphia beats U.S. a...