Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,969 posts)
Fri May 24, 2019, 02:36 PM May 2019

Trump appeals ruling allowing banks to hand his financial records to Congress

Source: Reuters

NEW YORK - U.S. President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization on Friday appealed a court order allowing Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp to hand their financial records over to Democratic lawmakers.

They are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan to overrule U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos, who on Wednesday refused to block the banks from responding to subpoenas issued last month by two U.S. House of Representatives committees.

Deutsche Bank, Capital One, the House Financial Services Committee and House Intelligence Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The committees have agreed not to enforce the subpoenas for seven days after Wednesday's ruling.



Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-appeals-ruling-allowing-banks-to-hand-his-financial-records-to-congress/ar-AABRfWq?li=BBnb7Kz

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump appeals ruling allowing banks to hand his financial records to Congress (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2019 OP
This can delay things but ultimately it's a legal loser. n/t PoliticAverse May 2019 #1
Well this seems pretty friggin' annoying ... mr_lebowski May 2019 #2
+++ agree with you. iluvtennis May 2019 #3
Exactly! Why would anyone do otherwise? One further thing... appal_jack May 2019 #4
Because the committees need to seem like the reasonable party in court bitterross May 2019 #8
Your a loser dementia boy... Maxheader May 2019 #5
Russian Asset ffr May 2019 #6
Look, asshole Haggis for Breakfast May 2019 #7
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. Well this seems pretty friggin' annoying ...
Fri May 24, 2019, 02:46 PM
May 2019

"The committees have agreed not to enforce the subpoenas for seven days after Wednesday's ruling."

WHY THE HELL NOT?

Without stays granted from the Judge for possible (lol) appeals, the Committee should be grabbing EVERYTHING as quickly as possible if you ask me.

Didn't we read yesterday that a couple institutions had already sent the requested docs?

GRAB THAT SHIT, NOW. If you have to give it back later, so be it.

IMHO

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
4. Exactly! Why would anyone do otherwise? One further thing...
Fri May 24, 2019, 05:00 PM
May 2019

I agree 100% with your post, mr_lebowski, with one addition (bolded):

"The committees have agreed not to enforce the subpoenas for seven days after Wednesday's ruling."

WHY THE HELL NOT?

Without stays granted from the Judge for possible (lol) appeals, the Committee should be grabbing EVERYTHING as quickly as possible if you ask me.

Didn't we read yesterday that a couple institutions had already sent the requested docs?

GRAB THAT SHIT, NOW. If you have to give it back later (after making multiple digital and physical copies), so be it.

IMHO


-app
 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
8. Because the committees need to seem like the reasonable party in court
Fri May 24, 2019, 09:50 PM
May 2019

This makes good, strategical, sense. If they allow the Trump this time to try to appeal, then when they get to SCOTUS they can prove they have made every effort to be reasonable and work with Trump's team to find a path to cooperation without the court having to get involved.

This will make any arguments to higher courts easier for the committees. They won't have appeared to be bratty toddlers like Trump.

They are doing the right thing in letting him exhaust all arguments at the lower courts. That way, the higher courts won't have any reason to remand the case back to the lower courts for further consideration. A little bit of time NOW can save a lot of time later.

Maxheader

(4,373 posts)
5. Your a loser dementia boy...
Fri May 24, 2019, 05:04 PM
May 2019


And I hope you and your criminal offspring go into the slammer...

For a long time...
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump appeals ruling allo...