Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,845 posts)
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 01:55 PM Aug 2019

Trump Won't Let No. 2 Spy Chief Take Over When Coats Leaves

Source: NYT

WASHINGTON — The White House is planning to block Sue Gordon, the nation’s No. 2 intelligence official, from rising to the role of acting director of national intelligence when Dan Coats steps down this month, according to people familiar with the Trump administration’s plans.

The decision to circumvent Ms. Gordon, who has served as the principal deputy director in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, is likely to upset Republicans and Democrats in the Senate. They have expressed doubts about Representative John Ratcliffe, Republican of Texas, who is President Trump’s choice to be the next Senate-confirmed leader of the agency.

Mr. Trump did not allow Ms. Gordon to deliver a recent intelligence briefing, according to a person familiar with the matter. Opposition in the White House to letting her serve as acting director has raised the question of whether she will be ousted as part of a leadership shuffle at the intelligence director’s office that will be more to Mr. Trump’s liking.

A federal statute says that if the position of director of national intelligence becomes vacant, the deputy director — currently Ms. Gordon — shall serve as acting director.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/02/us/politics/john-ratcliffe-sue-gordon.html




22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Won't Let No. 2 Spy Chief Take Over When Coats Leaves (Original Post) demmiblue Aug 2019 OP
Sexist pig hates to hear the truth about our National Security TeamPooka Aug 2019 #1
And hates to hear it from an intelligent woman.. n/t monmouth4 Aug 2019 #2
Bingo underpants Aug 2019 #4
Bingo x 2 iluvtennis Aug 2019 #11
that would be the 'sexist pig" part TeamPooka Aug 2019 #7
"The decision...likely to upset Republicans" Leghorn21 Aug 2019 #3
Yes, and once again, Susan Collins will be "very disappointed." Haggis for Breakfast Aug 2019 #21
And concerned, I'm sure. nt tblue37 Aug 2019 #22
That is a treasonous action by Red Don. Leningrad Lindsey & Moscow Mitch are beaming. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2019 #5
Truth hurts C_U_L8R Aug 2019 #6
Federal Statute???? maxrandb Aug 2019 #8
Ah, but she's a woman. Firestorm49 Aug 2019 #9
Refusal to Swear Allegiance to Vladdy, Sane Floridian Aug 2019 #10
Wasn't this why A. Johnson was impeached? Retrograde Aug 2019 #12
Drumpfuck has an election to subvert and a country to pilfer Ponietz Aug 2019 #13
so...will there be any consequences for breaking this federal statute.... dhill926 Aug 2019 #14
He wants a Trump ass kisser. world wide wally Aug 2019 #15
"She's not his type". BHDem53 Aug 2019 #16
The statute say the No 2 DNI SHALL serve as acting DNI DeminPennswoods Aug 2019 #17
I believe that late in the day he (Trump) reversed himself - at least in terms of the "acting" salin Aug 2019 #18
Someone managed to hold his attention for long enough to explain 'federal statute' muriel_volestrangler Aug 2019 #19
I think you got the content of the conversation.... just wondering who could hold (and how) his salin Aug 2019 #20

Leghorn21

(13,524 posts)
3. "The decision...likely to upset Republicans"
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 01:59 PM
Aug 2019

Yes no doubt they will go crazy and yell and tweet and express just how "upset" they are, right?

YEAH I DON'T THINK SO

Firestorm49

(4,032 posts)
9. Ah, but she's a woman.
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 02:56 PM
Aug 2019

And we all know how much Republicans respect women. After all, there must be at least three in Congress.

Retrograde

(10,136 posts)
12. Wasn't this why A. Johnson was impeached?
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 03:53 PM
Aug 2019

For his attempts to remove officials contrary to federal laws? It's something else Nadler can include in his hearings.

salin

(48,955 posts)
18. I believe that late in the day he (Trump) reversed himself - at least in terms of the "acting"
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 07:03 PM
Aug 2019

DNI director for Sue Gordon.

Given how rarely he backs down - I wonder whose pushing back efforts (with an eye toward actual National Security) got his ear and convinced him to briefly back down.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
19. Someone managed to hold his attention for long enough to explain 'federal statute'
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 07:51 PM
Aug 2019

and that breaking the law in quite so brazen a manner wasn't really worth it just to show off his misogynist credentials to his incel fanbois.

salin

(48,955 posts)
20. I think you got the content of the conversation.... just wondering who could hold (and how) his
Fri Aug 2, 2019, 08:02 PM
Aug 2019

attention that long.

I would think that working in/around the white house is an absolute nightmare work environment.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Won't Let No. 2 Spy...